Mark R. McGrath, experienced Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury attorney in Raleigh, NC with 0 reviews
Lawyer credibility
rating system
LCRS
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
Below Average 4,00
Is this your profile? Claim it for free in just a few minutes!

Mark R. McGrath

8222 Creedmor Avenue, Raleigh, NC

star star star star star
0.0 / 5
Data reflects the status as of the latest update. Updates are typically done monthly.

License

License ID number: -

Licensed in: -

Year admitted: -

Education

1991:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, J.D.
1986:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, MA - Masters
1984:
University of Rochester, B.A.

Publications

2020:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Court of Appeals Clarifies Rule 9(j) Requirements
2020:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, NC Court of Appeals Expands Real Estate Developer Liability’s
2020:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Court of Appeals Clarifies a Rule 9(j) Requirements Part 2
2020:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Court of Appeals Clarifies Rule 9(j) Requirements
2020:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Court of Appeals Clarifies Rule 9(j) Requirements
2012:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Gift From the Bench: A Guide to Getting Expert Witnesses Into Court
2012:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Effective Date of Tort Reform a Headache for Lawyers and Plaintiffs
2011:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Who’s Responsible for Injury at an Unsafe Workplace? Could be Anyone
2011:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Holding Bates Motel and its Sort Liable for On-Site Crimes
2010:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Professor Pedant Uses N.C. Precedent to Critique Campbell
2010:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Employer Negligence? Make Sure the Order Spells it Out
2010:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Third-Party Cases in Hiding: the Corporate Relative Case
2010:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Decision has Revolutionary Effect on Operating Room Negligence Cases
2010:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Professor Pedant Slices the Campbell Ruling with his Analytical Blade
2010:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Civil Procedure Rules Increasingly Used for Gotcha Litigation
2010:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Consider Third-Party Premises Liability when Analyzing Comp Claims
2009:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Rescuing Third-Party Claims from Silent Death in a Comp File
2009:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Excavating Negligent Host Claims Buried In Comp Cases
2009:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Anatomy of an Industrial Explosion Case
2009:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, How to Play the Corporate Shell Game to Help your Comp Client Win
2008:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Third-Party Claims Offer Best Chance for Full Compensation of Workplace Injuries
2008:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Despite Stark Facts, Power Line Cases Can be Complex
2008:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Case Law can Mean Failure to ID Proper Defendant can have Draconian Consequences
2008:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Sanity Restored? N.C. Supreme Court to Revisit Same or Similar Communities Standard
2008:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Nursing Home Residents, Injured Patients Take a Beating In Azar
2008:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, N.C. Premises Liability Law is Variation of Roman Notion
2007:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, N.C. Appellate Courts’ Treatment of Woodson Amounts to Reversal
2007:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Legal Options Narrowed for for N.C. Employees
2007:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Kenyon v. Gehrig: Are Surgical Malpractice Cases Dead In N.C.?
2007:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Red Ipsa Amputated: Plaintiffs Turn to Circumstantial Evidence
2007:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, High Voltage, High Stakes (Part II): Shop Around for Evidence, Experts In Electrical Injury Cases
2007:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, High Voltage, High Stakes (Part I)
2007:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Don’t Forget About the Standard of Care
2006:
Trial Briefs (NCAJ), A Jury of Their Peers: The High Price of Peer Review Confidentiality
2006:
Trial Briefs (NCAJ), A Jury of Their Peers: The High Price of Peer Review Confidentially
2006:
North Carolina Lawyer, Surviving Wrongful Death Part II: Shall it be Survival or Death?
2006:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Familiarity Breeds Success: Strategies for Bullet-Proofing the Medical Expert In Malpractice Cases
2006:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Familiarity Breeds Success: Strategies for Bullet-Proofing the Medical Expert In Malpractice Cases
2006:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Establishing Agency in Medical Malpractice Cases Part I: the Basics
2006:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Establishing Agency in Medical Malpractice Cases Part II: the Law
2005:
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly, Back to the Horse and Buggy Days: North Carolina Courts Harken a Return to the Locality Rule
See more

Best lawyers in Raleigh, NC

See more
Wesley Swain Wood, experienced Intellectual Property attorney in Raleigh, NC with 3622 reviews
Average
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
38,78
star star star star star
5.0/5
Google Maps
5.0
3622 Reviews
star star star star star
21 Dec, 2024 by Dean
Absolute Scam and Unprofessional Behavior Jeremy, I hired you to help with a bogus speeding ticket, where I have clear dash cam footage showing my speed, location, and the officer’s actions before and after the stop. The officer claimed I was going 80 in a 45, wrote the wrong location of the stop, and the speed limit on that road was actually 55. My speedometer was at 61, clearly shown on the dash cam. Yet, you had the nerve to tell me you could “maybe” reduce the ticket to a 14-over, despite knowing the entire ticket was a joke. After this ridiculous introduction, I called the very next day—over a month before the court date—and requested a refund. Your desk lady assured me I’d get a full refund. But today, I get a call telling me the case was continued (even though I fired you), and now you’re only offering half of my payment back because you “spent 20 minutes” on my case? That’s a load of crap. Then, to top it off you have the audacity to threaten me with legal action if I dispute this scam through my bank. You’re not even competent enough to handle a simple case like this and now you’re acting like a crook. I honestly feel bad for your firm that you’re so desperate for this money, but I’ll be sure to keep on sharing my experience the community. Keep the half—you clearly need it more than I do. Shameful.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
18 Dec, 2024 by Xavier taylor
Was great help to keeping my points and penalties down to a minimum kept future options for me as well just in case I need them.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
16 Dec, 2024 by Method director
Very helpful and great communication.
Read more Google Maps
See more
Randall Millard Whitmeyer, experienced Business, Intellectual Property attorney in Raleigh, NC with 3622 reviews
Average
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
38,78
star star star star star
5.0/5
Google Maps
5.0
3622 Reviews
star star star star star
21 Dec, 2024 by Dean
Absolute Scam and Unprofessional Behavior Jeremy, I hired you to help with a bogus speeding ticket, where I have clear dash cam footage showing my speed, location, and the officer’s actions before and after the stop. The officer claimed I was going 80 in a 45, wrote the wrong location of the stop, and the speed limit on that road was actually 55. My speedometer was at 61, clearly shown on the dash cam. Yet, you had the nerve to tell me you could “maybe” reduce the ticket to a 14-over, despite knowing the entire ticket was a joke. After this ridiculous introduction, I called the very next day—over a month before the court date—and requested a refund. Your desk lady assured me I’d get a full refund. But today, I get a call telling me the case was continued (even though I fired you), and now you’re only offering half of my payment back because you “spent 20 minutes” on my case? That’s a load of crap. Then, to top it off you have the audacity to threaten me with legal action if I dispute this scam through my bank. You’re not even competent enough to handle a simple case like this and now you’re acting like a crook. I honestly feel bad for your firm that you’re so desperate for this money, but I’ll be sure to keep on sharing my experience the community. Keep the half—you clearly need it more than I do. Shameful.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
18 Dec, 2024 by Xavier taylor
Was great help to keeping my points and penalties down to a minimum kept future options for me as well just in case I need them.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
16 Dec, 2024 by Method director
Very helpful and great communication.
Read more Google Maps
See more
Tiqeece Brown, experienced  attorney in Raleigh, NC with 23 reviews
Average
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
35,02
star star star star star
5.0/5
Google Maps
5.0
23 Reviews
star star star star star
17 Feb, 2025 by Joan loughney
I was quite anxious about setting forth on the journey of establishing a family trust. Taylor Way and his staff were outstanding. Taylor responded quickly to my numerous questions and concerns. Walked me through the process gracefully. I came out on the other side relaxed and confidant that my heirs would be properly provided for according to my wishes. Best part … my house will NOT have to go through Probate!
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
17 Feb, 2025 by Barbara allen
The people at OATH are amazing. Very professional and knowledgeable, and at the same time very kind and supportive. I highly recommend them!!!
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
14 Feb, 2025 by Linda clark
Google Maps
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Raleigh, North Carolina?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top