Craig Alan Newburger, experienced Criminal Defense, Family Law attorney in Cincinnati, OH with 22 reviews
Lawyer credibility
rating system
LCRS
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
Average 39,68
Is this your profile? Claim it for free in just a few minutes!

Craig Alan Newburger

9435 Waterstone Blvd, Cincinnati, OH

star star star star star
5.0 / 5
Avvo
5.0
info
Avvo rating
22 Reviews
Data reflects the status as of the latest update. Updates are typically done monthly.

License

License ID number: -

Licensed in: -

Year admitted: -

Education

N/A:
University of Dayton School of Law, JD - Juris Doctor
N/A:
Purdue University, PhD - Doctorate
N/A:
University of Cincinnati, MA - Masters
N/A:
University of Cincinnati, BA - Bachelor of Arts

Last reviews

See All Reviews
Overall rating
star
star star star star star
5.0 22 reviews
Avvo 5.0

Amy

star star star star star
21 Sep, 2024
I searched for a lawyer to handle my son's case for 6 months, I was finally given Mr. Newberger's name and number. I finally came across an intelligent man that gave me assurance he could do the job! He gave me info no other attorney could and refused finances until it is the time for him to step in. My son's case being a complicating one has had my nerves in a bind, now just waiting .......
Read more Avvo

Qianna

star star star star star
22 Aug, 2024
He did a very good job on my friend case I highly recommend Mr newburger for any case if I ever need a layer I will call me Craig
Read more Avvo

Matin

star star star star star
07 Mar, 2024
I currently was in need for a lawyer and came across Craig Newburger. very knowledgeable, very helpful and seemed to really care about what I had going on and got me a lot of information that I was not even expecting. Saved me a lot of time not having to hunt it all down myself. Great people if you ever need a lawyer, he is the one to go to.
Read more Avvo

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Knowledgeable and experienced lawyer who provides valuable information and advice
“He gave me info no other attorney could and refused finances until it is the time for him to step in.”
2
Excellent communication and responsiveness
“He was always on time and ready. He always made himself available to take calls from me and worked long hours to make sure my case was handled properly.”
3
Compassionate and caring attitude towards clients
“He has compassion combined with expertise and toughness. Unlike many lawyers in this area, he puts his heart into his work, and he will tell you the truth.”
4
Willing to work on a flat rate fee basis
“His willingness to work for a flat rate fee made it possible for me to hire what in my opinion is the best attorney around.”
5
Aggressive and effective representation in court
“He stepped in with a new defense and aggressively defended us. He is professional and cares for his clients.”
Cons
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant cons were found.

Publications

2024:
Vindicator, The magazine of the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, pp. 19-21., Not Offered For The Truth: Flipping The Script
2024:
Vindicator, The magazine of the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, pp. 16-18., Reverse 404(B) Evidence; Bully With A Badge
2024:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, Editorial Board Member 2024-2015; 2002-1995 Terms
2022:
Vindicator, The magazine of the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, pp. 12-13., Competency and NGRI Defenses: Miranda Waivers And Battered Woman Syndrome Issues Should Not Be Overlooked
2019:
Vindicator, The magazine of the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, pp. 32-33., Competency To Waive Miranda Rights
2019:
Vindicator, The magazine of the Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, pp. 18-19., Defendant’s Motion For Court To Order Release Of Juvenile Records Of State’s Witness
2019:
Communication Education, Editorial Board - Guest Reviewer 2019, 2017; Editorial Board Member 2002-2000; 1996-1994 Terms
2018:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, Lobby as a Means for Expanding the Communication Instructional Base: A Second Look
2015:
The Ethics and Mores of Race (consulted 2010, and cited for contribution to nationally published book), Voting Rights and African Americans
2015:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, Lobbying as a Means for Expanding the Communication Instructional Base: A View from the Outside Looking In
2014:
Infidelity and Divorce "Waste Not, Want Not"; Cohabitation and Spousal Support; Spousal Support Modification Issues, Infidelity and Divorce
2013:
Ohio Divorce Guide, Divorce Contempt Actions: Pre and Post Decree
2011:
Ohio Divorce Guide, Ohio Spousal Support Calculations; Ohio Child Support Calculations
2011:
Ohio Divorce Guide, Property Division and Spousal Support (“Alimony”)
2006:
Innovative Higher Education Journal, Oral Communication Skills (Lead citations of nationally published work)
2001:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, Hostile work environment: What communication administrators and educators can learn from communication-based law.
1998:
Race, Health Care and the Law, Voting Rights And African Americans
1998:
Race, Health Care and the Law, Workplace Toxins and African Americans
1998:
Basic Communication Course Annual, Editorial Board, 1998-1997
1998:
"Race and Racism in American Law": "Race, Health Care and the Law", Reproductive Health Care: Workplace Toxins and the African American Worker
1997:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, "Other-Campus" Faculty Participation in the Tenure/Promotion Review Process: External Validation for Internal Decision Making.
1996:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, Administrator Beware: External Supervision Issues Regarding Human-Subjects Based Research.
1996:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, SCANS and the "Goals 2,000: Educate America Act"--External Validation for Expanding Communication Instruction Requirements across the Undergraduate Core Curriculum.
1996:
Basic Communication Course Annual, 1996-1994, Basic Communication Course Annual Editor
1996:
American Press, Complex Problem Solving In Groups
1996:
National Library of Australia, The Century Turns on the Basic Course: Two Remedies for Swelling Demands and Shrinking Resources
1994:
The Speech Communication Teacher, Testing students' ability to distinguish facts from inferences.
1994:
Basic Communication Course Annual, Self-Confrontation and Public Speaking Apprehension: To Videotape or Not to Videotape Student Speakers?
1994:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, Determining Reasonable Accommodations for the Learning Impaired: New Issues for Able-Bodied Communication Administrators.
1993:
Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, Departmental Textbook Publishing for the Introductory Communication Course: Pedagogical Boon or Exploitation?
1992:
Basic Communication Course Annual, Video-Modeling and Pre-Performance Apprehension: Is Ignorance Bliss?
1992:
The Speech Communication Teacher, "Wheelchairs, canes, and senility": Communicating with the elderly
1991:
National Library of Australia, "Fast-Tracking": Ain't No Golden Parachute So Don't Slide off the Rainbow
1985:
Public Relations Review, Self-concept, communication apprehension, and self-confrontation: A relational study.
1982:
National Library of Australia, Student Self-Concept Modification in Communication Courses: An Exploration of the Sources of Conflicting Findings
See more

Best lawyers in Cincinnati, OH

See more
Daniel Luke Webb, experienced Government, Social Security & Disability attorney in Cincinnati, OH with 3 reviews
Average
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
35,09
star star star star star
5.0/5
Avvo
5.0
3 Reviews
star star star star star
05 Mar, 2024 by Andyb
Daniel L Webb and Staff, Thank you all again for patiently walking me through each step of my successful SSA benefits case. The time lines you gave me with the results we could expect, ended up very accurate. I’m very pleased with the whole experience and outcome. Without your help and personal interest in me and my case, it would of not been possible. Thanks for your professionalism, Sincerely, AndyB
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
25 Jan, 2024 by Krystal
A late review but he help me win my social security disability hearing appeal back in 2021. I had the most difficult judge ever with a very low approval rate. He listens to your issues and concerns. He helped presented a good case for me during my hearing and won my case.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
16 Sep, 2020 by Scott
Daniel is a charismatic, smart, diligent, knowledgeable, and hard working attorney. When Daniel speaks, people listen; he doesn't mince words, and knows the right things to say and when to say it to win your case. Additionally, Daniel is very understanding and compassionate to what his clients are really going through, and actually listens. He is not the type of attorney that pushes you off to work with a paralegal, Daniel personally works closely one-on-one with his clients. He was able to navigate the ins and outs of my case, with my very rare and hard to understand disease, to successfully winning my case. Daniel is truly an amazing attorney, and he has all the traits, charastics, and skills you could possibly want from an attorney. Trust that you will not be disappointed if you decide to hire Daniel to represent you!
Read more Avvo
See more
Gregory Alan Temming, experienced Personal Injury, Workers Compensation attorney in Cincinnati, OH with 1 reviews
Average
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
39,03
star star star star star
5.0/5
Avvo
5.0
1 Reviews
star star star star star
11 Mar, 2016 by Mamie estes
Temming is very dedicated to helping his clients. He cares about his clients and takes the extra time to make sure everything is going well. I am very satisfied with his work performance.
Read more Avvo
See more
Carol Schwetschenau Wood, experienced Business, Civil Rights attorney in Cincinnati, OH with 1 reviews
Average
info
Lawyer credibility rating system is an internal lawyer evaluation system developed by the company based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 10 indicators. The rating can range from 0 to 100.
35,03
star star star star star
5.0/5
Avvo
5.0
1 Reviews
star star star star star
14 Oct, 2022 by Diana
Carol is an exceptional attorney and gets all desired results. Her no nonsense approach to violations with employers is second to none. I would highly recommend her for any employment law issues that you may incur.
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Cincinnati, Ohio?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top