Reviews

I would recommend Michael Pator to anyone he is friendly, helpful and easy to talk to. He makes you very comfortable like a friend and it made me feel very at ease to ask question.

Rude receptionist and charging for services not even given. Its not hard to answer questions by phone that takes less than 10 minutes and this costs 100 dollars before they will decide to take your case. Best way to describe this is scam artists.

This lawyer and this law firm do a very poor job of fighting for their clients. If you would like to lose your case and spend time behind bars, please hire this mediocre law firm. Ken Harris in particular is one of the most disappointing lawyers that has ever been hired, will not defend the client, will not fight for the client, instead he convinces clients to take poor deals as its the easier option for him, it is embarrassing to have been in business with this lawyer. - Of course you don't remember me despite our repeated interactions. My father (a lifelong outdoorsman) is still dealing with the consequences from 2012 when you convinced him to take a 3rd degree felony rather than fight for his rights. Very disappointing.

THE BEST. Easy to talk to and very, personable, the team at Rishor Simone is who I will always turn to for my legal needs. Top to bottom, from the lovely person who answers the phone to the attorneys who always greet me with a smile, they are the ones I want in my corner. Whether I drop in for a quick visit about my case or during a planned visit, I always feel Ike I am not only the priority, but I have the focus of a powerful team of attorneys.

Kelley Harley was amazing and so helpful

He does the job, but you never speak with the Attorney.

Had one of their attorneys for a comp case. The attorneys refused to enter into evidence proof the employer committed insurance fraud as defined by law, forgery as defined by law, already found to have deceived the court previously in the available transcripts, a professional misconduct that was already determined by the state on one of their witnesses,the attorney wanted to argue evidence that was never submitted into evidence by the attorney as required. Also the alleged IME was working for the employer in his deposition admitted by the employer counsel. As their witness was not independent, id propose purgury. I actually sent an email to this law firm about the conduct. More that was clearly questionable conduct. My question is, who do they work for? I was paying them to work for my person but every time I turned around they were defending the person or company from the facts that would have won my case years ago. Their evidence should have been determined inadmissible based on the misconduct by itself. They can't sue my person due to the facts are true and correct .