Justin James McShane

3601 Vartan Way, Harrisburg, PA

Practices

star star star star star
4.7 / 5
Avvo
5.0
info
Avvo rating
20 Reviews
Google Maps
4.7
info
Google reviews rating
333 Reviews
Data reflects the status as of the latest update. Updates are typically done monthly.

License

License ID number: -

Licensed in: -

Year admitted: -

Education

2001
Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law, JD - Juris Doctor
1998
Franklin and Marshall College, BA - Bachelor of Arts
1997
University of Limerick Law Department
1994
Georgetown Preparatory School, High School

Last reviews

Overall rating
star
star star star star star
4.7 353 reviews
Avvo 5.0
Google Maps 4.7

Linda bradley

star star star star star
16 Dec, 2024
Andrea and Katy were so helpful and would highly recommend their services!
Read more Google Maps

Shayla gilbert

star star star star star
13 Dec, 2024
I used Cory for my lawyer and he was not good I had a lot of issues and I’m very upset because I paid him a nice amount for him to support me and I feel like i could of just represented myself but you live and you learn thanks.
Read more Google Maps

Kimberly peck

star star star star star
10 Dec, 2024
Google Maps

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable and experienced in handling complex legal cases, including DUI, drug charges, and wrongful convictions
“Justin McShane was well worth every red cent that I paid. He was honest and upfront and answered every one of my questions timely. He is very knowledgeable and was completely prepared when he arrived for my preliminary hearing.”
2
Aggressive and effective in court, able to achieve favorable outcomes for clients
“Justin took control of the courtroom and accomplished exactly what we set out to do. He was well prepared and I can't express enough gratitude and appreciation for the way the McShane Firm worked to accomplish a positive outcome.”
3
Provides personalized attention and communication to clients throughout the legal process
“The support staff was outstanding and answered your questions and returned phone calls. I would highly recommend the McShane Firm to handle your case.”
4
Flexible payment options and billing practices to accommodate clients' needs
“Justin's firm has several options and payment plans. Heidi Etter is Justin's paralegal and she was fantastic through the whole process, quick to respond to any questions I had.”
5
Dedicated to achieving justice, even taking on pro bono cases for the wrongfully convicted
“The McShane Firm utilized their legal acumen to achieve the release of an innocent man, James Hugney, erroneously imprisoned for almost 37 years for a crime he never committed. Through the Firm's tireless, selfless pro bono work they fought for truth, for justice, for freedom.”
Cons
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant cons were found.

Publications

N/A:
The symposium of the 244th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, CHAL 26 Abstract: Traditional landscape of measurement science in the courtroom: Qualitative measurement uncertainty, the myth of infinite precision and total accuracy
2016:
McShane, Justin J. and Giaramita, Michael, Pennsylvania Gun Law: Armed and Educated Stanley Marie, LLC (US Law Shield, Houston, TX 2016), Pennsylvania Gun Law: Armed and Educated Stanley Marie, LLC
2015:
The American Academy of Forensic Sciences: 68th Annual Scientific Meeting (Orlando, FL-AAFS), Abstract: The Validity of Enzymatic Assay for Blood Al-cohol Content (BAC) Determinations
2014:
The Voice for the Defense (October, 2014)(22-31), Synthetic Drug Prosecution & Defense
2014:
Aspatore a Thomson-West Publication, “Guilty until Proven Innocent: Best Practices for Cal-ibration of Pipettes:” (approved for publication in Inside the Minds: Understanding DUI Scien-tific Evidence 2014 Edition
2014:
Aspatore a Thomson-West Publication, Basic Introduction to Gas Chromatography” (approved for publication in Inside the Minds: Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence 2014 Edition
2014:
Aspatore a Thomson-West Publication, The Lack of Legal and Forensic Suitability of En-zymatic Assay for Blood Alcohol Concentrations in Prosecutions of Alleged Drunk Drivers” (approved for publication in Inside the Minds: Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence 2014 Edition
2014:
The American Academy of Forensic Sciences: 66th Annual Scientific Meeting (Seattle, WA-AAFS, 2014), Abstract: The Constitutionality of the Cold Case CODIS Hit and an Offender not on Probation or Parole
2014:
NCDD Journal Volume 1 Issue 20 (Winter, 2014) (6-7), JustIn Science: Why the Number Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story
2014:
The Defense Never Rests The Kansas Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Newsletter (February 2014 Edition) (6-16), How does a GC-MS Machine Know that there’s a Drug in the Blood?
2014:
The Voice for the Defense (April, 2014)(18-25), PBTs for Drugs: Oral Fluid Collection Devices
2014:
The symposium of the 247the National Meeting of the American Chemical Society., CHAL Abstract: Linear Dynamic Range Challenges in Forensics
2013:
(The Tennessee Association of Criminal Defense Lawyer’s publication) July/August 2013 edition p. 8-19., The Always Get the Data! The Fukushima of Forensics: Annie Dookhan
2013:
The Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences: 65th Annual Scientific Meeting(Washington, DC-AAFS), Abstract: EPA, GLP, and USP vs. Forensic Science: Where is the Commutability? Why Are There no Standardized Methods Across All of Forensic Science?
2013:
The Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences: 65th Annual Scientific Meeting (Washington, DC-AAFS), Abstract: Scientific Workshop #14: Melendez-Diaz, Bullcoming, and Williams: Scientific Evidence and the Right to Confrontation
2012:
Attack- ing and Defending Drunk Driving Tests (James Publishing, 2008), An Epistemological Based Defense to the DRE-based DUI Prosecution
2012:
Texas Drunk Driving Law, 4th ed., (Newark, NJ: LexisNexis, 2008), Gas Chromatograph-Flame Ionization Detector for Forensic Determination in ETOH-based per se DUI Prosecutions: Introduction and Explanations of the Limitations of the GC-FID Assay
2012:
The Champion, Electro-Chemical Based Portable Breath Testing: A Potentially Dangerous Non-Specific and Non-Selective Measure at Roadside
2012:
NCDD Journal Volume 1 Issue 16 (Summer, 2012) 2-3, Why I Don’t Stipulate to Forensic Test Results
2012:
Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence: Fourth Edition, Chapter 3: Applied Epistemology or Subconsciously Bending the Truth: The Human Frailties of the Mind that Manifest in Bias of the Officer at the Roadside. The Drug Recognition Expert Program Serves as a Case Study for an Epistemology-Based Defense
2012:
Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company, Phlebotomy: Forensic & Medico-legal aspects
2012:
A Thompson Reuters business, Chapter 6: The Inabailty to Quantify BrAC measures,” in Lawrence E. Wines, Esquire, ed., Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence: Fourth Edition
2012:
Considering Justice Alito’s Williams Plurality and What, If Anything, It Means, The NACDL Champion Magazine (Aug,2012) (44-8)
2012:
A Thompson Reuters business (7-22), "Chapter 1: The Science of Search and Seizure in DUI Defense” Inside the Minds: The Legality of Search and Seizure in DUI Cases
2012:
Defending DUI Vehicular Homicide Cases (Aspatore; A Thompson Reuters business), Chapter x: Current Scientific Thoughts on Defending DUI Death Cases
2012:
Symposium of the 243rd National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, CHAL 26 Abstract: Burning the Accused at the Stake? Is arson/explosive investigation scientific or modern day witchcraft?
2012:
Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence: Fourth Edition, Chapter 7: A Scientific Examination of the Validity of Evidentiary Breath Testing as Applied to DUI Prosecution in the United States Today
2012:
How to Obtain Scientific Data (Discovery) Through the Court: How Does a Criminal Defense Lawyer Confront an Expert Witness, California Defender (Fall)
2012:
Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence: Fourth Edition, Chapter 5: How to write a Bulletproof expert report for use in criminal trials
2012:
Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence: Fourth Edition, Chapter 4: Consciousness of Guilt or Reasonable Confusion: How Applied Epistemology Can Negate the Burden Shifting Game in a DUI Refusal Case
2011:
American Chemical Society Symposium Series Books, False Convictions and Bad Pharmacology: The Danger of the Drug Recognition
2011:
Symposium of the 241st National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Call for meaningful validation of the Drug Recognition “Expert” protocol in driving under the influence of drugs prosecution
2011:
symposium of the 242nd National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, CHAL 13 Abstract: State of forensic science in America today: Is it scientific at all? Is there a path forward?
2011:
The Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences: 63rd Annual Scientific Meeting (Colorado Springs, CO-AAFS, 2011)., Abstract E 23: Limitations of the Assay: Gastroesophageal Reflux and BrAC Measurements
2011:
Included in materials distributed at the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar’s “Rocky Mountain High: DUI/DUID Defense School at 10,000 feet", Glossary of Important Analytical Chemistry Terms
2011:
California Public Defenders Quarterly Newsletter, How to Obtain Scientific Data (Discovery) through the Court: In a World with Confrontation How Does a Criminal Defense Lawyer Confront an Expert Witness in the World of Analytical Chemistry?
2011:
Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence: Third Edition (Asporte: A Thompson Reuters business), Chapter 6: Headspace Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detector: What It Is and How to Cross-Examine an Expert on
2011:
CO-AAFS, Limitations of the Assay: Gastroesophageal Reflux and BrAC Measurements
2011:
Innovative DUI Trial Tools, Comprehensive Blood Discovery and the Reasons For It.
2011:
Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly, The Inability to Quantify: Values that are Outside the Demonstrated Linear Dynamic Range of Detection Lead to the Impossibility to Prove Guilt beyond a Reasonable Doubt
2011:
The NACDL Champion Magazine (Oct. 2011), A Post-Bullcoming World: Does Justice Sotomayor’s Concurrence Undermine The Majority Opinion?
2011:
The journal of the American Chemical Society, The Lack of Legal and Forensic Suitability of Enzymatic Assaying for Blood Alcohol Concentrations in Prosecutions of Alleged Drunk Drivers: Enzymatic assaying-The Indirect Measurement that is Non-specific to Ethanol that is Being Misapplied from the Clinical World into the Forensic Arena
2011:
The Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chiral Molecules: The Dirty but Open Secret in the Crime Laboratory
2011:
Understanding DUI Scientific Evidence: Third Edition (Asporte: A Thompson Reuters business), The Top Ten Points in Establishing a Viable and Scientifically Based GER/GERD Defense to Evidentiary Breath Testing Cases
2011:
California Drunk Driving Law (Costa Mesa, CA: James Publishing), Glossary of Important Analytical Chemistry Terms
2011:
North Carolina Association for Justice, Ohio Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, The California Public Defenders Association, and the Tennessee Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, Iconoclastic Thinking: Smashing the Paradigm of Effective Cross-Examination of Opposing Party Expert Witnesses. How Being Nice, Acting Like A Curious 5-Year Old, and Using the Social Convention of the Dating Ritual to Win
2011:
Intoxication Test Evidence: Second Edition (Eagan, MN: West: A Thompson Reuters business), Chapter 57: ISO 17025
2011:
Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly, The Inability to Quantify: Values that are Outside the Demonstrated Linear Dynamic Range of Detection Lead to the Impossibility to Prove Guilt beyond a Reasonable Doubt
2011:
The Voice (TCDLA)), Consciousness of Guilt or Reasonable Confusion: How Applied Epistemology Can Negate the Burden Shifting Game in a DUI Refusal Case
2010:
Symposium of the 240th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, The Lack of Legal and Forensic Suitability of Enzymatic Assaying for Blood Alcohol Concentrations in Prosecutions of Alleged Drunk Drivers: Enzymatic assaying-The Indirect Measurement that is Non-specific to Ethanol that is Being Misapplied from the Clinical World into the Forensic Arena
2010:
The Champion magazine, In the Defense of the Police at Roadside: The Officer Isn’t Always Lying: The Drug Recognition Expert Program as an Case Study for an Epistemological Based Defense
2010:
Textbook published through CDSD Publishing, Am I Going to Lose My License?
2010:
Intoxication Test Evidence: Second Edition, Chapter 6: The Changing Face of DUI Practice: A Time to Think Ahead
2010:
Textbook published by CDSD Publishing, Driving After Imbibing Manual-The Authoritative Guide to Defending Motorists Accused of Alcohol/Drug Impaired Driving In Pennsylvania
2010:
Textbook published by CDSD Publishing, Preliminary Hearing: A Primer for the Inexperienced
2010:
Textbook published through CDSD Publishing, Pennsylvania Vehicle Code and the ‘New’ Driving After Imbibing Law: A Practioner’s Guide to Successfully Defending Against the Commonwealth and PENNDOT License Suspension
2006:
Textbook published through Lorman Education, Traffic Law Practices in Pennsylvania
See more

Best lawyers in Harrisburg, PA

See more
star star star star star
02 Oct, 2018 by Corinne
I can't speak highly enough of Chris' skills and the experience we had working with him on a complex administrative appeal. Chris demonstrated exceptional attention to detail and to critically analyzing the facts of the case to build persuasive testimony. He was extremely sensitive to the regulatory climate and to the importance of maintaining relationships with state agencies through the process. Chris' ability to be both a strategic thinker and quick responder makes him well suited to handle cases of all types. Above all else, he is a team player, unequivocally committed to excellence in his work and a tremendous asset to his clients.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
28 Feb, 2018 by Anonymous
Christopher successfully defended me in a criminal investigation from the U.S. EPA. He was extremely thorough and used witnesses and outside investigators effectively.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
27 Aug, 2015 by Claudia
When I was corporate counsel for an $8 billion global CPG company, I engaged Chris to partner with me on a sensitive project. He was up front with estimates and able to tweak his approach to meet the organization's needs. He has exceptional executive presence and can deliver difficult messages with grace and professionalism. He's a problem solver and a great asset to corporate counsel and business people alike.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
02 Dec, 2024 by Audrey bloom
I cannot say enough good things about Attorney Frommer. During the time of my injury. It was very stressful along with painful. Attorney Frommer was very kind and patient with me. He explained every step of the way. In terms, that I could understand. He welcomed me to call him if I had any questions about the process. He was very understanding and very knowledgeable. He took a lot of my stress away. So I could focus on my healing. I truly don't know what I would have done without Attorney Frommer. He was truly a godsend. I highly highly recommend him for any and all workman's comp cases. You will not go wrong with Attorney Frommer.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
07 May, 2024 by Joseph houseman
5 out of 5 stars, dealing with Mr D'Amico and his team made this whole difficult process so easy and straightforward and brought it down to a level to where I could understand clearly what I needed to do. They were very helpful and respectful of my decisions and encouraged me to only make choices that I was totally happy with.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
17 Feb, 2023 by James mckeithan
Excellent service and by far one of the best attorneys around.
Read more Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
29 Sep, 2016 by Victor martinez
Eileen A. Pomento is a very professional and dedicated lawyer. She handle my case for two years and few month. She work hard to solved it on my favorite. She always made sure that I had my payments from worker's comp on time. If I had any problems she always took care of them. I feel very happy of how she handle my case. Thank you for being so loyal to your clients and for winning my case!!!
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top