Reviews

Valencia Nash is the type of person who rather play football in court than practice Law of Evidence. I am even having to wait for another trial in four cases that was already tried in her court because of how crooked she is. In one case, the jury found that I proved my case by a Preponderance of the evidence but they still also found in favor of the Defendant and that I take nothing from the suit..... HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN??? ANOTHER CASE WAS WHERE THE ATTORNEY GAVE HER OPENING STATEMENT TELLING THE JURY THAT YES HER CLIENT RAN INTO THE BACK OF ME BUT THE JURY CAME BACK WITH A NOT GUILTY PLEA EVEN AFTER WATCHING THE VIDEO OF HIM SLAMMING INTO THE BACK OF ME..... ONLY IN HER COURTROOM CAN THESE THINGS HAPPEN...... THEN WHEN THIS LADY HIT ME FROM THE SIDE OF MY VEHICLE, THE DEFENDANT SHOWED HER THE PICTURES AND EVEN AFTER VALENCIA NASH LOOKED AT THE PICTURES SHE ASKED ME IF I HAD MY OWN EVIDENCE TO PROVIDE. WHEN I TOLD HER THAT THEY WOULD BE THE SAME THING THEN SHE TOLD ME THAT SHE WAS DISMISSING THE CASE IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT SINCE I DIDN'T HAVE ANY EVIDENCE.... THE SAME PICTURES THAT SHE WAS HOLDING IN HER HANDS LOOKING AT ON HIS PHONE.