Lawyers map
Reviews
Top review highlights
Pros
1
Knowledgeable, experienced, and aggressive attorneys who fight hard for their clients
“Mr. Ritchie and his paralegal Vanya were absolutely amazing with handling our case! Very straight forward, attentive and understanding with our tons of questions and concerns and fought for us when we needed it!!”
2
Compassionate and caring team that treats clients like family
“The entire staff were professional, compassionate, and caring. Mr. Ritchie heard my story, really heard it, and from that moment, he and the firm advocated tirelessly on my behalf.”
3
Successful in getting positive outcomes, including case dismissals and favorable rulings
“Derek Ritchie got my case dismissed. It only took Mr. Ritchie one court hearing to unite me with m”
4
Responsive and communicative, keeping clients informed throughout the process
“Valerie was incredibly patient and kept me informed every step of the way, making sure I understood the process and felt supported.”
5
Reasonable and fair pricing, not dragging out cases unnecessarily for profit
“His rates are very fair (he will NOT drag out your case for more profit).”
Cons
1
Lack of communication and responsiveness from the firm, including difficulty reaching attorneys and staff
“I called to get information for a consult. The paralegal I spoke with was not helpful whatsoever, did not listen to my concerns and did not provide sound advice.”
2
Disorganization and poor case management, leading to delays and additional expenses
“Mr. Derek Ritchie's failure to coordinate crucial appointments, such as meetings with me regarding court hearing mediations trials. Never use evidence in court resulted in additional delays and expenses I received invoices stating I had paid other seniors attorney.”
3
Potential bias towards certain clients and cases, not always fully advocating for the client's best interests
“Their first duty is to the court, if a judge tells any one of their lawyers not to wear a certain suit again they will bend over backwards. Their duty is not in the best interest of the child but to the court first!”
