Reviews

Jacob was professional, honest, and reliable. I would not trust anyone else to handle any legal matters for me!

Jacob Gunter has been a wonderful attorney for me over the past year or so. I didn't think I needed an attorney after my car accident. I naively assumed that the insurance companies would take care of everything, but when the medical bills started piling up, Jacob explained how he could help me make sure all my bills were paid and future expenses accounted for in the final settlement. I couldn't have asked for a better lawyer!

Jacob is among the most straight forward and hard working and passionate lawyers/attorney's Ive seen Very pleased!

Highly satisfied with my experience. Jacob was Very professional, he educated me on what to expect, what the likely outcome would be and then he achieved it! Wouldn’t hesitate to recommend him.!

Jacob handled our claim from the very beginning. Very little interaction needed by us. Paid our physical therapy, chiropractic, and medical bills. Obtained double the amount originally offered by the other party's insurance company. Highly recommend him.

Jacob is an amazing lawyer. I would recommend his services to anyone.

Jacob worked many cases for me and always pulled out very successful. Quick and timely. Kept me updated and informed on what was happening on a daily basis. Would highly recommend if searching for an attorney with your best interest always in mind

Jake was awesome to work with, I learned so much about personal injury cases while he was representing me. He always made sure I understood what was going on and why. He's worked on so many personal injury cases that he is very familiar with many MD's and how they can help you with your case and treat your injuries. I'm glad I have someone I know I can count on if anything ever happens in the future ( hopefully they won't). I highly recommend using him for any of the areas he practices law in. Top notch!

1 star well earned. .... Sean Petersen was an effective lawyer, much like his father. However, as a Comissioner, he was charged with the civil duty to review and address the needs of the citizens in his cases. Without bias or an officious attitude. He was sworn in January 2018, and was assigned to my case in early June. I was quite disappointed in how he handled my case. I was proactive about submitting evidence and documents ahead of schedule, and when you can't afford an attorney in a civil matter, the judge/commissioner's ability (or inability in this case) to properly mitigate unfair resolution can have a severe impact on the outcome of the case. The outcome can have a severe impact on one's life (career, background check, etc.) I did everything I could to show him that the petitioner (my ex-fiance) was abusing the judicial process and using defamatory statements to fuel her never-ending quest for revenge. I submitted numerous documents that substantiated my claims, provided notarized witness statements, and requested these witnesses be subpoenaed. I also gave a lengthy personal statement (5 pages) in regards to the impact these issues were having on my career, my friends and family, and my ability to freely maneuver in life. As for the firm itself, I consulted with 2 separate attorneys, asking for legal counsel and for pro-bono hours. I brought to them the same documents I submitted to the court and they weren't willing to represent me or give me enough advice to shoot me in the right direction. They didn't want to represent me because they were cconcerned about Commissioner Petersen's recusal affecting their careers. He is the largest shareholder of this firm. The Judicial system is littered with bias, favoritism, and pay-to-play politics that make it difficult for any reasonable citizen involved to truly benefit from it. I've been a local taxpayer for quite some time and was not given adequate or fair treatment. However, the tax-payer funded salaries of these individuals were accepted regardless, and is not based upon their performance as an elected, sworn official. As a Criminal Justice major, I'm passionate about the affect our local judicial authorities have on the community. I'm very passionate about the fair and equal treatment of tax payers that are often dragged into legal battles without proper education or representation. I'm also passionate about money not affecting the decisions of these representatives, and that honor and principle prevail. There is no need to rush these cases. Both sides need to be heard. Both parties need representation and stamping or electronically signing papers that have real world consequences attatched to them isn't enough. If you've made it this far then in my review, I am grateful and maybe you can relate. If you are one of the members mentioned above, surely you agree that changes can and should be made to improve the system. If you are a politician and would like to advocate for effective change, start with reforming the judicial branch. The culture is toxic, dehuminazing, and lacks philosophical and ethical back bone. And although I acknowledge there are plenty of honest and hardworking Americans involved, the system itself is fractured and needs an overhaul of reform. The scales must be balanced, and lady justice cannot be blinded by the systems self-perpetuated bias. My favorite cases that highlight the strengths and weaknesses of our judicial system are: Madison v. Marbury & Dred Scott v. Sanford & Brown v. Board of Education