Reviews

I hired Maarij Nasar for my divorce case. Our pretty simple case was really drawn out with many mistakes along the way. Had to really pay attention to docs sent to me as there were often multiple mistakes including simple things like name and age (multiple times). Bills sent I didn't find reflective of the work done. At the end of it my ex wife and I decided to just communicate with each other to finish the delayed process. I felt 2 stars reflective as at the end of the day, it did get done and when we were able to talk, Maarij did seem like a nice guy. Just wish they cared and at the very least took care of details and in a timely fashion.

I participated in an arbitration where Dan Williams acted as the arbitrator. Unfortunately, there were several procedural issues that, in my opinion, reflect poorly on the arbitration process under his control: Allowing submission of edited documents after the deadline: After both parties had submitted their final documents for review, Dan Williams permitted the opposing party to submit new and edited documents beyond the agreed-upon deadlines. Despite my request for clarification and to address this, I never received a response. Failure to provide information on the argument procedure: My inquiry regarding the procedure for oral arguments went unanswered until during the argument itself, leaving me unprepared for the process. Delay in receiving the oral argument recording: I requested the recording of the oral argument, and it took three weeks and multiple follow-ups to receive it. This unnecessary delay impacted my ability to provide timely information to my lawyer for follow-up advice. In each of these instances, the decisions were entirely within the arbitrator’s control. I believe they negatively impacted the fairness, integrity, and transparency of the arbitration process.

Used as arbitrator, did not read through and consider the evidence and facts provided. Awarded ex spouse home equity in home she did not own and awarded myself all of the debt. Awarded ex my retirement when that was not on the table. Decision was unexpectedly not based on Washington laws. I was per se because I had no funds available due to tremendous debt. Ex was represented by attorney that provided NO EVIDENCE of claims. However, the ruling did not reflect this. I would not recommend as arbitrator due to bias.

Atikan

Stay away from this company. If I could give 0 stars I would ! John is very impatient , unprofessional , rude, unethical and aggressive! A mediator's job is to be objective, calm and diplomatic and not take sides ! He doesn't have any of these skills ! My ex husband to and I agreed on almost everything before the mediation and John told him during the call that my lawyer was lying! It almost feels like instead of helping us out he was trying to turn us against each other ! It was a horrible experience and after 1.5 hours ( after John hang up on my lawyer and I ) I told my lawyer that I am not going to proceed with John's services! Shortly after the call my husband and I agreed on everything else!

Really delayed and unable to get anyone on the phone. Should be able to get a real person to answer a question either by email or phone in 24 hours. Not equitable in verdict as arbitrator either. Dont recommend

John Curry is an absolutely horrible mediator. He’s inappropriate, condescending, and inflammatory…just to name a few. Stay away!

Very bad service I paid the full amount my case should have been submitted to the court waited almost 3 Months when I went to the court they told me your case should have been filed 3 Months ago whenever I try to reach out via email my lawyer never replied so I pay them but I did the paperwork instead when I asked to refund my money back they refused