Top review highlights

AI generated excerpts from the customers reviews
Pros
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant pros were found.
Cons
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant cons were found.

All reviews

star star star star star
07 Jul, 2017 by Mario
Totally negliject ! I only was used as a " Tip Client" A total ignorant - never read properly my documents , had no idea to open him mouth! I knew nothing about the case , just force me to after money to the woman! He doesn't represent the man he represent the woman course - robbing me and lost the case A total disaster . His huge number of clients make him to "Skip 70% of them and use it as fees! Do not ever hire him! Hire a new Lawyer that fight for a name and profession He is a Ignorant and a man with no respect for the money I pay him. I would send him to drive a forklift in a warehouse for Fred Meyer !
star star star star star
12 May, 2015 by Anonymous
I'll give Scott an A+ when it comes to winning custody of your children. One time I forgot to copy his assistant on a response to potential contempt charges, which resulted in an untimely response motion. I complained but learned it cost more money to complain because all emails and phone calls are charged to read and charged to respond, plus the complaints always lead to blaming the client. This left me with a choice of rolling over and taking it or finding a new lawyer before settlement conference. I chose to roll over but I regret that choice. I wound up having to fire Scott, hire a new lawyer and go to trial. This could have been a disaster had it not been for my new lawyers high ethical standards. It was a night and day difference.
star star star star star
20 Dec, 2013 by Anonymous
Scott and his team handled an acrimonious divorce for my elderly mother. Opposing counsel was a money grubbing, appalling excuse for a human being prone to incessant frivolous motions and underhanded tactics. Scott and his team stood up to this and put him in his place. The firm certainly has its way of communicating which initially seemed to be unresponsive, but they more than got the job done in the end. I have dealt with many attorneys in a variety of situations over the years and have never encountered a more professional, ethical and decent one than Scott. He is highly qualified, a tireless advocate and a very fine person. I would recommend him without reservation, Worth every cent.
star star star star star
21 May, 2013 by Anonymous
He charged $55 to respond to an email and $30 for a brief phone call. His paralegal was borderline unfriendly to talk with. Scott was not responsive in his emails. He actually neglected to notice important evidence of fraud which would have put the other party on the defense at pre-trial settlement. Two months later I had to stand next to him over his shoulder to point out where in his email inbox he could find my emails, which were sent to him 4 months prior. For an attorney who has been rated as "super lawyer" and endorsed by others, his performance was disappointing. My experience illustrates the actual value of "super lawyer" nomination---not [Fill in the blank]. When the actual trial came around, he looked like a student who had not been studying the whole semester now tried to cram everything in. That was what the scene looked like. When the other party refused to produce documents, he never worked hard to compel the production of those documents. Follow-up was also poor. I had to remind him. The court declarations written by the paralegal seemed to be generated by minimal works. However, the dollars charged is top notched in this area. I would not recommend him based on my experience. However, your mileage may vary. The review written here follows the guideline "Explain what your lawyer did (or failed to do) with your case. We will only accept reviews that clearly indicate they were written by an actual client...but not too specific...." It is unfortunate that some reviewers here appeared to have written comments about speculations and judgements about other clients' personal attributes and their experience with this attorney, both of which they knew nothing. I would like to respectfully reiterate that reviewers need to follow the guideline as this is not an area for creative writing. Readers are interested in reading about attorney-specific review and not one's speculation or imagination about other clients and their cases.
star star star star star
30 Aug, 2012 by Robin
Scott Horenstein has a mind for leaving no stone unturned. He is one of the hardest working attorneys and firms I have ever been a client of. Scott has the very best experts ready and willing to work with him. Scott surrounds himself with the highest quality of Paralegals and staff available. Scott's character, integrity and work ethic are of the highest level. Scott exceded all expectations. A true professional and exemplary member of our community. I can't imagine anyone writing an unsatisfactory review on Scott Horenstein or his firm, the real issue must have been within one's self. With Scott, you get your money's worth. If your the type of client more concerned about how much you pay your attorney , your not allowing him to do his job at the level that win's case's. I would highly recommend Scott Horenstein, and if it were for a dissolution of marrage I would run to retain Scott before your spouse could!
See more

Best lawyers in Vancouver, WA

See more
star star star star star
16 Oct, 2019 by Jeff
I consulted Mr. Dunkerly asking him to review an existing case. After an initial visit, then with his assistance, he then revealed important additional information in regards to the existing case. Very helpful, definitely would recommend his services, and/or opinion in any future matters.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
02 Feb, 2017 by Shannon
I've never met an attorney quite like Edward l. Dunkerly. Not only is Ed profoundly unique as a human being but also in his depth of knowledge in not just one, but in several fields of law. When you couple that with the vast amount of experience Ed has in private practice as well as courtroom experience. ..... well, I can't think another attorney I'd rather have represent me in whatever my legal needs at the time..
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
27 Jun, 2012 by Anonymous
Kurt is extremely sharp, prompt and to the point. He is also upfront and in my case was affordable compared to others.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
15 Oct, 2008 by Anonymous
I've always been impressed with Kurt's professionalism and knowledge. I would gladly recommend his services.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
15 Oct, 2008 by Anonymous
Kurt has been very helpful in guiding my Company in the filing, upgrading, expansion and litigation of our intellectual property. Kurt is both enthusiatic about what he does and very knowledgeable about what he does. He is very protective of his clients' IP and I would have no hesitation in recommending Kurt to cleints looking for a good Patent Counsel.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
02 Feb, 2016 by Michael langsdorf
James Howsley and I worked on a joint Land Use project near Ridgefield, Washington.several years ago. He was very competent and professional in his approach and as a result both of our clients prevailed in getting their land accepted by the City of Ridgefield even thou their land was on the other side of the I-5 freeway from the City of Ridgefield.
Read more Google Maps
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Vancouver, Washington?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top