Michael D. Cicchini

620 56th Street, Kenosha, WI

Practices

star star star star star
4.2 / 5
Avvo
4.6
info
Avvo rating
10 Reviews
Google Maps
4.1
info
Google reviews rating
42 Reviews
Data reflects the status as of the latest update. Updates are typically done monthly.

License

License ID number: -

Licensed in: -

Year admitted: -

Education

1999
Marquette University, JD, summa cum laude
1997
University of Illinois Board of Examiners, CPA
1994
Marquette University, MBA
1990
University of Wisconsin, Parkside, BS

Last reviews

Overall rating
star
star star star star star
4.2 52 reviews
Avvo 4.6
Google Maps 4.1

Trevor

star star star star star
06 Feb, 2024
This is the best family law attorney I know definitely would highly reccomend hiring her for all your family law needs so helpful and knowledgeable
Read more Google Maps

Katelynn selman

star star star star star
22 Jan, 2024
I contacted almost every attorney who can defend against temporary restraining orders in kenosha county. Most wanted $3000-$5000 retainers for these cases. Being a woman living alone working two jobs and putting myself through school that just wasn’t feasible. I contacted mary and she was the first attorney to make me feel confident that they could fight this. Mary’s consultation was very very in depth and she made sure to touch on all points such as facts of the case strategy and what you should appear to court in clothes wise. Mary also ensured to call me a day before the hearing to once again go over information. Going into court with mary i felt confident with my case and that she could defend me. Mary was able to defend me and get the case closed and TRO vacated within a very short time in court. I didn’t even have to answer questions in court. Mary defended me and was very honest about what the outcomes could be. I would recommend her to anyone in need of legal services that she provides. She’s not out here charging thousands for something that could be one hearing and closed. Thank you so much Mary you are truly amazing. Prayers we never have to meet again in a good way!
Read more Google Maps

Kaite hurst

star star star star star
11 Jan, 2024
She was a GAL for my CHIPS case…. Didn’t know hardly anything about the kids. Just what she was told by the state… I think she wants to retire. She doesn’t seem to really look at the facts and deep into chips cases at least to get down to the nitty gritty of the situation at hand… if you have a chips case and she is the GAL be prepared for her to push for your children to be removed from your home, for your rights to be terminated.. she also has personal relationships with foster families and was very close with the foster family my child was placed with. That alone was a huge conflict of interest… but foster family wanted to adopt from day one. Mary as I said was extremly close with the foster family in my situation. So no matter what was said in court, proved in court, so many lies were told… Mary I believe goes with the states suggestion no matter what. And in my case she did just that and was also good friends with foster family!!! She and the state were emailing each other back and fourth during court… almost like high school girls passing notes. Making sure they had their story straight and arguments made sense and everyone was on the same page… she knew absolutely zero about my children nor me. But if she is you’re GAL for a chips case I’d see if you can get a different one. She needs to retire already!!!
Read more Google Maps

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Highly knowledgeable and skilled in criminal defense law
“Mike is an excellent lawyer! He has his clients best interests in mind and works hard to accomplish the best scenario possible for his clients.”
2
Effective at getting favorable outcomes, including dismissals and reduced charges
“Mike was able to reach a plea deal that had my best interest in mind as well as all original charges dropped.”
3
Provides thorough and clear explanations of the legal process
“His explanation was very thorough regarding Wisconsin law and the court system.”
4
Highly responsive and available to clients, even on weekends
“Mr. Cecchini was always available and returned phone calls promptly, even on a Sunday evening.”
5
Dedicated to criminal defense, as evidenced by speaking at conferences and writing extensively on the topic
“Mike is also extremely devoted to criminal defense - he speaks at conferences and writes prolifically.”
Cons
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant cons were found.

Publications

2018:
Gonzaga Law Review, Educating Judges and Lawyers in Behavioral Research: A Case Study
2018:
U. Cincinnati L. Review, Spin Doctors: Prosecutor Sophistry and the Burden of Proof
2018:
Oklahoma Law Review, Combating Prosecutor Misconduct in Closing Arguments
2018:
Florida Law Review, Convictions Based on Character: An Empirical Test of Other-Acts Evidence
2017:
Columbia Law Review Online, Testing the Impact of Criminal Jury Instructions on Verdicts: A Conceptual Replication
2017:
California L. Rev. Online, Instructing Jurors on Reasonable Doubt: It's All Relative
2017:
U. Pittsburgh Law Review, The Battle over the Burden of Proof: A Report from the Trenches
2016:
U. Richmond Law Review, Truth or Doubt? An Empirical Test of Criminal Jury Instructions
2015:
Vermont Law Review, On the Absurdity of Model Rule 1.9
2014:
Hofstra Law Review, The Collapsing Constitution
2013:
George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, An Alternative to the Wrong-Person Defense
2012:
SMU Law Review, The New Miranda Warning
2012:
Idaho Law Review, Overcoming Miranda: A Content Analysis of the Miranda Portion of Police Interrogations
2011:
Fordham Law Review, Dead again: the latest demise of the confrontation clause
2010:
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Reforming the law on show-up identifications
2010:
Missouri Law Review, An economics perspective on the exclusionary rule and deterrence
2008:
New Mexico Law Review, Broken government promises: a contract-based approach to enforcing plea bargains
2008:
Tennessee Law Review, Judicial (in)discretion: how courts circumvent the confrontation clause under Crawford and Davis
2008:
Arizona State Law Journal, An empirical basis for the admission of expert testimony on false confessions
2007:
Seton Hall Law Review, Prosecutorial misconduct at trial: a new perspective rooted in confrontation clause jurisprudence
2006:
Lewis & Clark Law Review, Confrontation after Crawford v. Washington: defining "testimonial"
See more

Best lawyers in Kenosha, WI

See more
star star star star star
22 Oct, 2024 by David laitano
First and for most they were completely honest and accommodating.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
17 Oct, 2024 by Becky rivard
The Wittmeyer Lawyers handled my accident case that occurred in 2022. The details of my accident were somewhat challenging due to being in another person's vehicle during the said accident. Mr. Payne, Terri, & associates handled the case as quickly as could be expected. I understand there were times that things can be frustrating in these cases, but Mr. Payne always spoke to me in a kindly manner & helped me understand the wording of the case records at all times as needed. As a client of the Wittmeyer Group I would recommend & reuse them again in the future if there is ever a need for this type of Lawyers. Thank you for your continued service. God Bless you all & Happy Holidays. Sincerely, Becky Gervasi-Rivard
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
27 Sep, 2024 by Dan wolf
Ron Wittmeyer and Greg LaCost are top-notch injury attorneys. I have referred a number of clients to them and the results have been consistently excellent. Greg is exceptionally skilled with difficult trip-and-fall cases… he has achieved very substantial settlements in cases that could easily have been turned down on the facts. I will absolutely continue to refer my clients to RF Wittmeyer Ltd. Daniel Wolf – Schwartz Wolf & Bernstein LLP
Read more Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
05 Oct, 2023 by Anonymous
Mr. Marry was vigorously recommended to me, with absolute promise of his success, were he to handle my DV case. Facing felony charges and the ruin of my foreseeable future, I went to Phil an absolute wreck. I was shocked at how calm, composed, and collected he remained, and at how hopeful he was for my situation. His secretary, Mrs. Jen, was just as wonderfully reassuring, and confident in his abilities. Phil worked with me financially, explained every step of the process, and ensured that I was aware of every possible outcome of my dire circumstances. He facilitated the passing of information to all parties involved, and I believe it was this aspect of his multifaceted professionalism, that granted me an Ordinance, rather than a Felony charge. Thanks to Phil Marry, I am able to spend time with my wife and better myself at home. I cannot possibly express my thanks and recommendation sufficiently enough.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
22 May, 2022 by Anonymous
We hired Philip when my son was in a heap of trouble. I highly recommend this lawyer! Everything went very smooth, and Jennifer was so helpful as well. Always promptly returned our phone calls, and actually cared about you.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
02 May, 2022 by Dan
I retained Phil to represent me in a Domestic incident I was involved in. Phil was very detail oriented and professional. He's also very knowledgeable, down to earth and made me feel comfortable. He got me the outcome I was hoping for. Im very very greatful! His communication is top notch and he has very good relationships with everyone at the courthouse. 10/10 rating!!! A++++!!! Thanks Phil!
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
04 Dec, 2012 by Anonymous
They are easy to work with and know what they are doing. We will refer them to anyone who needs an attorney. We were able to get our house protected and our Trust, POA, Will and all the documents that go with it for a fair price.
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Kenosha, Wisconsin?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top