Top review highlights

AI generated excerpts from the customers reviews
Pros
1
Provides valuable legal assessments and advice free of charge
“Mr. Provis offerred a valuable assesment of my personal legal issue free of charge, but most importantly, he wasted no time and addressed the exact issue which I presented to him.”
2
Responsive and helpful in addressing clients' legal needs
“He was informed, descriptive, and helpful to my clear and present need.”
Cons
1
Engages in unethical and frivolous litigation practices
“Attorney Provis was recently sanctioned by Federal District Judge William Conley for improperly preparing and filing a frivolous civil RICO complaint against a number of defendants.”
2
Fails to follow court rules and procedures
“Provis know his lawsuit was fraudulent but carried it on for eleven months. This suit, Upchurch v O'Brien et al 19-cv-165, Western District of Wisconsin, and others Provis is handling, e. g. Dane County case Burke v St. Paul's et al 21-cv-1287, demonstrate that Provis is untrustworthy and repeatedly fails to follow rules of Court.”
3
Lacks professionalism and responsiveness
“As I said in the beginning it started out very nice he was very generous but is that truly generous if he doesn't do anything for you and in the meantime you bypass your time lines and your love no recourse and you can't appeal it anymore cuz too much time is left so did he give me a deal or did he take advantage of me by having me pay what I did pay and then what radio silence after turning my calls stopped returning my emails.”

All reviews

star star star star star
27 Mar, 2024 by Kim howell
First let me explain Tim provis was very kind and accepting me making payments cuz you know I could not afford to give a big large retainment so he allowed me to make payments of $300 a month for a total of $5,000 to appeal a case of corruption and Manitowoc County with that being said although he eventually offered to finish the case pro bono and said he was planning on filing a writ of prohibition in which he never did. He told me I didn't have to finish making any payments I feel it was a disservice because doing the case pro bono or even at a reduced rate is no deal at all if he doesn't return your calls file an emotions this goes beyond just the case I mean the judge was an obstructionist of Justice he lacked him out of e-file wouldn't allow him notifications of hearings that were coming up for me I ended up having a warrant issue for my arrest he said he was going to file a Prohibition because they were denying to him access to the file so that he could represent me and he never did any of that and as I said in the beginning it started out very nice he was very generous but is that truly generous if he doesn't do anything for you and in the meantime you bypass your time lines and your love no recourse and you can't appeal it anymore cuz too much time is left so did he give me a deal or did he take advantage of me by having me pay what I did pay and then what radio silence after turning my calls stopped returning my emails. At the very minimum he should have filed a complaint with the judicial commission that's a judge was not allowing him access to e-file so that he could represent me it was a confidential case that I should not have had access to however the corrupt judge inserted me into that confidential case then denied me access to it so I couldn't have representation so it wasn't me trying to get access to records I didn't need or wasn't required to have it was the judge you inserted me into the confidential case and then refused to allow my lawyer any access to the files so that he would be on notified of any Court hearings when I missed a court hearing because I was that notified nor was he a warrant was issued for my arrest I might add that this case it won't was issue for my arrest I wasn't even a party to the case literally she parked me out the street to find me in contempt and sanctioned me 6 months jail sentence to be stayed unless than a month later he took back that stay and gave me 20 days in jail and I was forced to move out of state so now I don't know what recourse I have I can't file an appeal because the time is lapsed the only thing I'm thinking is maybe I can file a civil to find a civil attorney to represent me in federal court for ineffective assistance of counsel and judicial corruption
star star star star star
02 Oct, 2023 by James hed
I called this man to get some legal advice and he was the mist disrespectful person I have ever talked to. First of he interrupted me every sentence that I spoke. Was never able to get one entire sentence out. Then told me it doesn't matter if there was evidence that was never admitted to the court. Extremely disrespectful and very rude. DO NOT USE THIS MAN. You're better off with a public pretender.
star star star star star
11 Aug, 2023 by Timothy m. o'brien
Attorney Provis was recently sanctioned by Federal District Judge William Conley for improperly preparing and filing a frivolous civil RICO complaint against a number of defendants. Provis’ complaint was dismissed with prejudice against each defendant. Provis was ordered by Judge Conley to pay all attorneys’ fees and expenses for three defendants. Provis now owes those defendants over forty thousand dollars. Provis misconduct also exposed his client, the plaintiff in the case, to Judge Conley’s order to pay all the same $40+ thousand in fees and costs. Judge Conley also found that Provis filed the RICO case for an improper purpose. Namely, Provis was assisting his client in carrying on a many years old vendetta and harassment of defendants. See Upchurch v O’Brien et al, 19 cv 165, Western District of Wisconsin, Judge Conley Opinion and Order dated August 16, 2021; order 7/26/22 and Judgment entered August 4, 2022. Provis’misconduct May be investigated by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
star star star star star
26 Sep, 2022 by Anonymous
On August 4, 2022 Federal District Judge William Conley entered Judgement against attorney Provis requiring Provis to pay $31,963.21 plus judgment interest to persons Provis had sued in a frivolous lawsuit. Frivolous means there were no fact supporting the story Provis made up in the suit. Judge Conley also found that Provis filed the suit for an improper purpose, namely, to allow his client to carry on a years’ long vendetta of harassment and threats. Provis know his lawsuit was fraudulent but carried it on for eleven months. This suit, Upchurch v O’Brien et al 19-cv-165, Western District of Wisconsin, and others Provis is handling, e. g. Dane County case Burke v St. Paul’s et al 21-cv-1287, demonstrate that Provis is untrustworthy and repeatedly fails to follow rules of Court. In the Burke case, Provis was recently ordered to pay attorney’s fees and cost because he failed to perform discovery in accord with rules of court.
star star star star star
09 Jul, 2021 by S s
Horrible Attorney, Does Nothing, You Do the Work ! Maybe when he was younger he might of helped you but he is too old and Burned out and Senile . Yells and very unprofessional ! He will Scam You out of your money ! Don’t Get Scammed !
See more

Best lawyers in Port Washington, WI

See more
star star star star star
19 Aug, 2022 by Valerie
Experienced and kind bankruptcy attorneys, James Stanek did most of the filing and things and his partner appeared with me on the court date (by phone). Both were kind, explained/demystified the process very well, and made a difficult decision and process as low stress as possible, which I appreciate. They were always open to my questions. Absolutely recommended 100%!
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
07 Jan, 2022 by Wagner riley
An excellent choice. Extremely professional. This is a very personal, difficult decision for most people. We were made to feel comfortable with our decision and at no time felt demeaned because of our situation. We would highly recommend them.
Read more Google Maps
star star star star star
18 Jun, 2021 by J.patrick mccaughn
Took the time to help me. Gave me FREE ADVICE.
Read more Google Maps
See more
star star star star star
23 Dec, 2008 by Anonymous
Was very ahpy with the service and the cost. They are far below the price of any other lawyers I contacted. The staff was friendly, and the work was done fast. I couldn not have been more satisfed with my experience.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
26 Jul, 2021 by Tommy je (coughfee and kannibus)
Google Maps
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of Port Washington, Wisconsin?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top