Lawyers map
>1,018k
experienced lawyers
Thank you for your service. You are the best lawyer I have ever hired.
Different
review sites
review sites
>7
Filter by
19 Apr, 2021 by Jabari
He always makes excuses. He doesn't know what he is doing at all. He is a con artist.He has been disbarred. Do not waste your money on him.
Read more
25 Aug, 2020 by Renae miller
I met Lance Thomason back in 2011 when he was just starting out and he was very professional back then and got things done for me in a very timely manner here we are now in 2020 and I still feel the same I have used plants for another issue he paid great attention in spite of his heavy load case he got all the details and he is handling it for me immediately he is very outgoing he is very precise professional and friendly and you won't be disappointed he will get the job done.and the bad review above was done by my sister, who never met him, she is just mean, and she did it because she was trying to prevent me from using any lawyer against her
Read more
01 Apr, 2014 by Anonymous
any and all documents he drew up for us wre done wrong; each time it took an act of congress to get him to correct it and even then it took many times to get it right and after all that he tries to charge gross amount of money for making corrections he did in error...experiences with him, a living nightmare
Read more
06 Jul, 2022 by Maggie m
Very satisfied with Mr. Adam Slater as my attorney on a big case. Mr. Slater (AND his firm) was more communicative than any other attorney that I had ever encountered. Mr. Slater returned calls, was thorough and he cared (really) I read a negative review here, however, I must strongly disagree! This guy is definitely the best.
Read more
30 Oct, 2021 by Anonymous
I called this lawyer because of a similar case they had handled before, and I had the same medical issue. First he was very rude and patronizing. And then gave his own diagnosis that I was almost blind before my corrective eye surgery so I should not be suing the Doctor and that LASIK was not perfect ( I was not complaining about my actual power of my glasses after surgery the problem is I am not able to use my eyes and focus on computer or read a book as it causes extreme pain and migraines and I can not lead a normal life). I called him after consulting two ophthalmologists and further I already had an appointment with a doctor who specializes with complications after LASIK (So the issue was complication after LASIK procedure not that my vision was not better after the surgery, I would not have had the severe debilitating complications if the doctor had done the traditional PRK surgery for me instead of LASIK but alas!! he seemed he knew everything and said I should be happy I got a good result. I am living with Photophobia (wearing sunglasses even indoors, and migraines almost everyday and he calls this good result!)
He had no patience to listen to what I was saying and interjecting his own personal opinion. For instance I mentioned only one time the doctor's name in our conversation - for that he said I was obsessed with my doctor!! I only mentioned his name because the practice had several doctors and I mentioned who it was that did my surgery.
He had problems from get go about every thing I said first he said I had a thick accent (I have been teaching for 20 years no student or colleague of mine has ever told me they can not understand me because of my accent). Then he said I was cutting him off ( in fact he was cutting me off and mansplaining!). He also took my DOB info which was weird since I had not even hired him. (now I am worried what he is doing with that info).
I was so upset after talking to him that I called the receptionist and told her someone in his firm has to know how rude and condescending he was even though I realize nothing would be done about it.
I totally understand if he had told me he will not take my case, but the way he was so rude and condescending is beyond me.
Read more
27 May, 2024 by Steve t
Tried to blame a 9 year old for being recorded in a plane's bathroom. Shame
Read more
15 Mar, 2020 by Mohammad heidararabi
10 Oct, 2023 by Anonymous
Extremely knowledgeable, responsive and results-oriented attorney with deep knowledge of financial services law.
Read more
30 Jun, 2023 by Anonymous
Ben is by far the worst attorney. He milked money from us when all he had to do was get a closing letter. Other EXACT cases got that. He then tried to milk us more by stalking our social media and websites when we told him not to. Then he tried to bill us a crazy amount. DO NOT HIRE HIM and his horrible firm. We will be reporting him to the bar
Read more
23 Oct, 2017 by Edward
Mr Mcgrath HAS BEEN SANCTIONED BY THE NH BAR, IN MY case which he took in a class action suit 31/2 yrs ago. this had to do with the meningitis and tainted medicine. initially Mr Mcgrath told me it may take a year but he said I would get something out of it, I had been hospitalized for three day in Fl.quarantined!! I called every six monthes ad got the same story oh the judge has it everything looks good. after the 3rd year I suddenly am told my case was being handled by a par legal or what ever and she would update me. I call this woman who was out as she was taking the bar exam in the Carolinas, so a couple more run around calls, finally I get Mr Mcgrath who hems and haws the tells me it look like MY PAPERWORK NEVER GOT FILED. HE SAID HE WOULD CALL ME BACK. THE NEXT DAY HE CALLED AND COMFIRMED THAT MY CLAIM WASNEVER FILED WITH THE COURT.OF COARSE I checked with a few NH attorneys about mal practice but that was useless just like Mcgrath.
Read more
06 Sep, 2017 by Justin
I want to thank Peter McGrath and his team for always providing such excellent services. The professionalism and diligence from start to finish on my new business venture was above and beyond my expectations – from legally forming a business to writing up sale contracts, we covered it all! The knowledge, attention to detail and dedication to making sure my business started off on the right foot was excellent. The entire team has also helped me with my family services such as forming trusts and writing up wills. I highly recommend McGrath Law Firm for any and all of your legal needs.
Read more
13 May, 2024 by David caballero
I have run a national company for over 25 years and have dealt with dozens of trial attorneys. Bob is the most knowledgeable and thorough attorney that I have ever dealt with. I would only recommend him when in need of an attorney in New Orleans.
Read more
07 Aug, 2019 by J shaw
23 Oct, 2023 by Catherine
I hired Mr. Lynn on 11-20-2020 to handle two cases in Alabama, one in Mobile and one in Montgomery. I explained all of the complicated issues that both cases involved. He agreed and I paid him a deposit for both cases. Let me be very clear, when he did his job, he did it well, my issues are how he has repeatedly ignored me and was dishonest to me over the course of almost 3 years (today is 10-16-23). I cannot count the dozens and dozens of voicemails, texts, and emails that were never answered. Most of the issues that I paid him to do are complete. However, I still need a letter/form from him to basically state part of what he was (already) paid to do, when I asked him (AGAIN) to do this, his answer was NO, I AM DONE. The case in Montgomery was closed on 9-2-23. I emailed, called, and texted him the entire month of September and the first 2 weeks of October to get the status of the case (with no response at all from Mr. Lynn). On 10-13-23, I called the court clerk in Montgomery and that is how I found out it was closed (not from Mr. Lynn). I asked Mr. Lynn why it took me doing that to get the information - he had no reply to that. If you have ANYTHING that is time-consuming DO NOT USE J. Paul Lynn!! If you need something simple that is done and paid for at the same time, then he is probably ok to use. I will be filing a grievance with the Alabama State Bar Association. Like I stated earlier, not only did he ignore me, but he lied to me several times (about things that he really should not have lied to me about-one of those lies was about his cousin owning a hotel in the Jacksonville, FL area and at the time I was repeatedly going there for treatment at the Mayo Clinic. He told me that he had emailed his cousin and I could stay 2 nights for free - I did not ask Mr. Lynn to do this, he offered. When I showed up at the hotel they did have a not reservation for me and had not heard of Mr. Lynn or his cousin - it was embarrassing - I tried to contact Mr. Lynn while I was at the hotel but he never replied. I never got an explanation for it either). I was completely transparent with him throughout everything and paid him as soon as I received an invoice. The final payment for one of the cases - he did not have the deposit that I paid him in November 2020 on the invoice (was charging me again) - he said he did not keep his records that long??!! It has been less than 3 years - not very long to keep financial records (the IRS suggests keeping financial records for 7 years - Mr. Lynn is in business for himself AND an attorney, not only should he know this but he should be doing this for his own sake and his own records). So I emailed him a copy of his own receipt. I think that made him upset, but I told him all along I keep a record of everything. If Mr. Lynn reads this - I want him to know that I did not want to write a negative review about him. I have begged and pleaded with him to finish the job he was paid, in full, to do. (The reason he was paid in full before the job was complete is because he said he would not finish the job until I paid him in full). Everything that I have written is completely, 100% true and I have emails, text messages, and my phone records showing where I repeatedly called him and did not get a response for over a month at times - it usually took him, on average, 2 weeks to reply to a single message. Good luck if you decide to use him. I pray he stops treating his clients this way and treats his clients the way he would want himself or a loved one treated - which I said to him several times.
Read more
16 Apr, 2013 by Anna
Helped me probate my father's estate.
Read more
06 Oct, 2017 by Jeanne
Atty Jim Knowles handled my mother and father - in - law's estates, my parent's wills, POA, etc and my husband and my will as well as a couple of other minor legal matters. He is always fair, easy to work with. A decent person. I have recommended him many many times and will continue to do so.
Read more
01 Jun, 2017 by Anonymous
James Knowles was hired to handle the will/ testimony, estate. Once our family member passed away it was near impossible to contact Mr. Knowles. This estate is still not 100% settled after almost 14 years. I do not recommend this lawyer. He's never in his office, never returns calls. This entire ordeal has been very frustrating.
Read more
22 Feb, 2021 by Ben sorenson
30 Oct, 2016 by Thomas hussman
How much money did Brian Rice remove from the Technimar Scandal? Will you now admit, Mr. Rice, that you had a fiduciary responsibility as the Minneapolis Police Pension Fund lost Millions of dollars. I think you are a violent and corrupt man, Brian. And I will look you in the eye anytime...anywhere. @FBI
Read more
26 Feb, 2014 by Robert locke
This attorney has a very promising and "Hope Raising" website. He touts that he "Fights for the Little Guy". I am disabled in my 50's, can't afford my prescribed medications and the State of Washington has RAPED my Constitutional rights. His office said they are unable to help me at this time. He had a movie made about him regarding the 99' WTO protests and the false arrests I guess if your not worth of a movie deal you are not worthy of his representation!!
Read more
20 Oct, 2010 by Diem
Mike represented me in a case that was extremely contentious and long drawn. From the moment he came on board, he alleviated my concerns at having to deal with the opposing counsels' tactics.
Mike's dedication to his clients is unsurpassed in more ways that I can articulate. He is tenacious in his representation of his clients, he is protective of his clients' interests, and he is committed and skillful in getting the best results for them.
In short, Mike's experience coupled with his integrity and compassion that few others can compete with are just a few reasons why I wouldn't hesitate to recommend Mike.
Read more
17 Mar, 2024 by Agunited4
I can't say enough about how impressed I have been with Roberts legal representation. He helped me out with a debt collection suit in Marion County and I found him to be extremely knowledgeable. It was difficult for me to find an attorney to represent me in this matter but he thoroughly reviewed my case and answered the many questions I had. I appreciated his candor and the fact that he did not attempt to create unrealistic expectations. He then proceeded to provide great counsel and results. He went above and beyond what was necessary and stipulated at the outset of our contractual agreement. I also found his fees to be very reasonable which is always important. I would highly recommend him and will certainly retain his services in the future of necessary.
Read more
13 Dec, 2018 by Stefan
Robert E Duff missed two of our appointments, never responded to my voice mails for him, nor bothered to answer my text messages. The whole thing to get an appointment was nothing else than a huge waste of time. Unprofessional.
Read more
13 May, 2024 by David caballero
I have run a national company for over 25 years and have dealt with dozens of trial attorneys. Bob is the most knowledgeable and thorough attorney that I have ever dealt with. I would only recommend him when in need of an attorney in New Orleans.
Read more
07 Aug, 2019 by J shaw
28 Sep, 2023 by Anonymous
He will tell you whatever you want to hear, and drag out "your case" until a month before the 2 year mark, so no one will touch you with a hundred foot pole! He preys on the grieving, please do not hire him!
He's immoral, unprofessional and should be ashamed of himself! Karma will come back to him one day
Read more
21 Sep, 2022 by Gianna
Dr. Blaudeau is a surgeon and lawyer who takes on any doctor or hospital! He loves his clients and fights for them.
Read more
13 May, 2024 by David caballero
I have run a national company for over 25 years and have dealt with dozens of trial attorneys. Bob is the most knowledgeable and thorough attorney that I have ever dealt with. I would only recommend him when in need of an attorney in New Orleans.
Read more
07 Aug, 2019 by J shaw
13 May, 2024 by David caballero
I have run a national company for over 25 years and have dealt with dozens of trial attorneys. Bob is the most knowledgeable and thorough attorney that I have ever dealt with. I would only recommend him when in need of an attorney in New Orleans.
Read more
07 Aug, 2019 by J shaw
11 Oct, 2017 by Anonymous
Initially, Mr Connor seemed to be the right person for the job. We agreed to several aspects of how we were going to proceed. In the end Mr. Connor reneged on his initial promises and guarantees. I signed his agreement not agreeing to the terms because he assured me it was standard and he would make the necessary adjustments when we had a final outcome, if needed. Not only did Mr. Connor failed to keep his promises, he did not actively represent my best interests in this case.
Read more
08 Aug, 2013 by John
I had purchased a car several years ago, and it wasn't long after doing so that I realized that I had been swindled. I contacted Mr. Connor, and within days I was released from the contract.
Read more
22 Dec, 2023 by Raven marie
Do not use this guy whatsoever! I did it online inquiry to set up a consultation. And he reached out to the other party and let them know everything that I said in my consultation inquiry. He represents the other party. I did not know that. This is illegal and I’m reporting him to the board. Completely unprofessional, lacks ethics.
Read more
22 Mar, 2023 by David hayward
Excellent team of attorneys with specialists in each area of the public school system from HR to 313.
Read more
13 May, 2024 by David caballero
I have run a national company for over 25 years and have dealt with dozens of trial attorneys. Bob is the most knowledgeable and thorough attorney that I have ever dealt with. I would only recommend him when in need of an attorney in New Orleans.
Read more
07 Aug, 2019 by J shaw
15 Oct, 2021 by Anonymous
I had a very good experience working with this law firm. They were very professional and represented me well. My attorney was fully prepared at all times and always answered any questions I had. Also, my attorney was extremely responsive to emails. You cannot beat that!
Read more
08 Jul, 2021 by Nancy
I was named a class representative in a class action suit and am in possession of a signed agreement between William B. Federman and myself. I was told by his legal assistant that the Court often awards an incentive fee to those who agree to act as figure head class representatives. When I contacted Mr. Federman some time after discovering that the suit had been settled, he claimed there was no record of my claim in the database. He dismissed my inquiry and although I was in frequent contact with his legal assistant on this class action suit, I was never notified of the settlement and never received any compensation nor an incentive fee. I would never recommend this attorney as his firm didn't live up to their end of the agreement and a one star rating is one too many.
Read more
10 Feb, 2021 by Anonymous
was able continue on this issue; letter seni to state; and forward email
to an acting attorney;claim was sent down from state farm head office
amount is at 1500; vks
Read more
03 Jan, 2015 by Anonymous
He was with me from the start to the very end on my case. He has Unbelievable Influence
over doctors and Insurance claim adjusters. I had an unfavorable outcome in my case but Greg will still continue to pursue his fee.
Read more
14 Feb, 2008 by Anonymous
YES
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
26 May, 2021 by Yolanda jeter
ALWAYS EXCELLENT SERVICE.
Read more
06 Apr, 2019 by Kerry bedard
08 Oct, 2023 by John yu
Every year Boston magazine publishes the results for top attorneys in Boston from different legal specialties, from business and criminal law to family and employment law. If there are top 100 attorneys; Edward Wayland would be voted as the top 10 WORST attorneys in Boston. I'm very grateful I had made the right decision to terminate him for ineffectiveness of his counsel. About few years ago, To today's day, I never regretted (terminating) firing Edward Wayland.
He almost ruined my life and my freedom. lack of communication, Failure to exercise diligence, ineffectiveness of his counsel, and Incompetence, Incompetence, and Incompetence. I'm in the process of filing a complaint against him to the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseer; Attorney and Consumer Assistance Program (ACAP), I think he should get his license suspended or revoked. (everything I stated here is true except for the top 10 worst attorneys).
Read more
01 Nov, 2022 by Cindy allen
I would like to share with everyone the extremely positive experience we had with Attorney Edward Wayland. We were "in the weeds" and getting "bullied" by opposing counsel. Edward just calmly and rationally cut through "the sideshow" intended to distract and turned the situation around 180 degrees. Most importantly Edward held to his integrity and achieved a "just" outcome. I am happy to speak with anyone directly as this is a real experience. You can contact Edward for my details.
Read more
Find by
State
- California
- New York
- Illinois
- District of Columbia
- Pennsylvania
- Florida
- Louisiana
- Alabama
- Georgia
- Massachusetts
- Missouri
- New Jersey
- Washington
- Texas
- Minnesota
- Ohio
- Colorado
- South Carolina
- North Carolina
- Virginia
- Connecticut
- Michigan
- Maryland
- Wisconsin
- Arizona
- Tennessee
- Indiana
- Oregon
- Mississippi
- Delaware
- Nevada
- West Virginia
- Arkansas
- Kentucky
- Utah
- Hawaii
- Kansas
- Rhode Island
- Maine
- Oklahoma
- Idaho
- Montana
- New Hampshire
- Iowa
- Alaska
- North Dakota
- Nebraska
- South Dakota
- New Mexico
- Wyoming
- Vermont
Find by
City
-
New York
-
Chicago
-
Washington
-
Los Angeles
-
Philadelphia
-
San Francisco
-
San Diego
-
New Orleans
-
Atlanta
-
Birmingham
-
Boston
-
Seattle
-
Miami
-
Minneapolis
-
Denver
-
Saint Louis
-
Kansas City
-
Irvine
-
Dallas
-
Pittsburgh
-
Houston
-
Baton Rouge
-
Fort Lauderdale
-
Cleveland
-
Tampa
-
Charlotte
-
Newport Beach
-
Phoenix
-
Columbus
-
Portland
-
Wilmington
-
Oakland
-
Indianapolis
-
Sacramento
-
Milwaukee
-
Columbia
-
Hartford
-
Baltimore
-
Las Vegas
-
Orlando
-
Coral Gables
-
Long Beach
-
Nashville
-
Costa Mesa
-
Newark
-
Santa Monica
-
Boca Raton
-
Jackson
-
Metairie
-
Beverly Hills
-
Mobile
-
Charleston
-
Little Rock
-
Raleigh
-
White Plains
-
Cincinnati
-
Pasadena
-
Austin
-
Buffalo
-
Saint Paul
-
Encino
-
Brooklyn
-
Madison
-
Montgomery
-
Sherman Oaks
-
Cherry Hill
-
Richmond
-
El Segundo
-
Jacksonville
-
Louisville
-
Melville
-
West Palm Beach
-
Lafayette
-
Mount Pleasant
-
Salt Lake City
-
Santa Barbara
-
Southfield
-
Walnut Creek
-
Greenville
-
Garden City
-
San Jose
-
Albany
-
Arlington
-
Bloomfield Hills
-
Charleston
-
Rochester
-
Glendale
-
Honolulu
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers
What a Class Action Lawyer Can Do for You
A class action lawyer specializes in representing groups of individuals who have suffered similar harm or injury due to the actions of a company, organization, or government entity. These lawyers file lawsuits on behalf of a large group (the "class") of individuals, seeking compensation or relief for damages caused by things like defective products, environmental harm, consumer fraud, or employment violations. Class action lawyers are skilled in managing complex legal processes that involve numerous plaintiffs and large-scale legal claims.
If you’ve been harmed by a product, service, or corporate action that also affected many others, a class action lawyer can help you join or initiate a collective lawsuit to seek justice and compensation.
When Should I Hire a Class Action Lawyer?
You should consider hiring a class action lawyer if you and a group of people have experienced harm or damages under similar circumstances. Common scenarios include:
- Defective products: If a product you purchased caused injury, illness, or other harm due to a defect, a class action lawyer can help you join a lawsuit against the manufacturer or retailer.
- Consumer fraud: If a company has misled consumers through false advertising, deceptive business practices, or scams, a class action lawsuit can be filed to seek compensation on behalf of all affected customers.
- Employment violations: If your employer has violated labor laws - such as failing to pay overtime, denying benefits, or enforcing discriminatory policies - a class action lawyer can represent a group of employees seeking justice.
- Data breaches: If a company’s negligence led to a data breach that compromised your personal information, you may be able to join a class action lawsuit seeking compensation for the breach.
- Environmental damage: If you or your community has been harmed by environmental hazards, such as pollution or toxic waste, a class action lawyer can file a collective lawsuit against the responsible party.
- Unfair financial practices: If a bank, lender, or credit card company engaged in fraudulent or illegal financial practices, a class action lawyer can help a group of consumers recover losses.
Hiring a lawyer early in the process helps ensure that you meet legal deadlines and that your case is properly prepared for a potential class action lawsuit.
What Does a Class Action Lawyer Do?
A class action lawyer provides a range of legal services to represent large groups of individuals in lawsuits. Their responsibilities often include:
- Investigating the claim: The lawyer investigates the facts of the case, including gathering evidence of harm, identifying potential plaintiffs, and determining whether a class action lawsuit is the best course of action.
- Filing the lawsuit: The lawyer files the class action lawsuit on behalf of the named plaintiffs (the representative plaintiffs) and others who have experienced similar harm.
- Class certification: One of the first steps in a class action is getting the court to certify the case as a class action. The lawyer will argue that the case meets the legal requirements for certification, such as the number of plaintiffs and commonality of harm.
- Communicating with plaintiffs: Class action lawyers keep plaintiffs informed throughout the process, including notifying potential class members about the lawsuit and giving them the opportunity to join the case.
- Negotiating settlements: Many class action lawsuits are resolved through settlements before going to trial. The lawyer will negotiate with the defendant to reach a settlement that compensates the class for their losses.
- Representing the class in court: If the case goes to trial, the lawyer will represent the entire class, presenting evidence, questioning witnesses, and arguing for the plaintiffs.
- Managing claims distribution: Once a settlement or verdict is reached, the lawyer helps manage the process of distributing compensation to class members, ensuring that all eligible plaintiffs receive their share of the award.
How Are Class Action Lawyers Paid?
Class action lawyers are typically paid on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only get paid if the class action lawsuit is successful. Here’s how their payment structure generally works:
- Contingency fee: Class action lawyers usually take a percentage of the settlement or judgment as their fee. This percentage typically ranges from 25% to 40%, depending on the complexity of the case and the amount of work involved.
- No upfront fees: You generally won’t have to pay any fees upfront. The lawyer covers the costs of the lawsuit, such as filing fees, expert witness fees, and court costs, and is reimbursed from the settlement or award.
- Court approval of fees: In class action cases, the court must approve the lawyer’s fee to ensure that it is reasonable. This helps protect class members from paying excessive legal fees.
Always discuss fee arrangements with your lawyer at the outset to understand how much they will be paid if the lawsuit is successful.
How Much Does a Class Action Lawyer Cost?
Class action lawyers generally work on contingency, meaning they don’t get paid unless the lawsuit is successful. Here’s a breakdown of potential costs:
- Contingency fee: Class action lawyers typically charge between 25% and 40% of the settlement or judgment. For example, if the lawsuit settles for $10 million and the lawyer’s fee is 30%, the lawyer would receive $3 million, and the remaining $7 million would be distributed to the class members.
- Court costs and expenses: In addition to the contingency fee, the lawyer will deduct the costs associated with the lawsuit, such as court filing fees, expert witness fees, and investigation costs. These costs are usually reimbursed from the settlement or award.
- No cost if the case is lost: If the class action lawsuit is unsuccessful, you typically won’t owe any legal fees or costs. The lawyer assumes the financial risk of the case.
It’s important to discuss potential costs and fee structures with your lawyer before the case proceeds to ensure transparency and avoid any surprises.
Top Questions to Ask a Class Action Lawyer
Before hiring a class action lawyer, you should ask key questions to ensure they have the experience and skills needed to handle your case effectively. Key questions to ask include:
-
What experience do you have with class action lawsuits?
Ensure the lawyer has a successful track record of handling class action cases, particularly in the area of law relevant to your case (e.g., consumer fraud, employment, defective products). -
How do you charge for your services?
Confirm that the lawyer charges a contingency fee, and ask for a detailed explanation of what percentage they charge and how expenses will be handled. -
What are the chances of success in my case?
Ask the lawyer for an honest assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of your case and the likelihood of certification as a class action. -
How long will the process take?
Class action lawsuits can take time to resolve, so ask the lawyer how long they expect the case to last, from certification to settlement or trial. -
Will I need to appear in court?
Ask if your participation will be required in court or whether the lawyer will handle most aspects of the case on behalf of the class. -
What is the expected settlement or recovery?
Ask about potential outcomes, including the expected settlement or damages, and how compensation will be distributed among class members. -
What happens if the case is lost?
Confirm that you won’t owe any legal fees or expenses if the case is unsuccessful.
How to Check the Credibility of a Class Action Lawyer
To ensure you are hiring a reputable class action lawyer, take the following steps to verify their credentials and experience:
- Verify their bar status: Check with your state bar association to confirm that the lawyer is licensed to practice law and has no history of disciplinary actions.
- Look for class action experience: Review the lawyer’s website or professional profile to ensure they specialize in class action cases and have successfully handled cases similar to yours.
- Read client reviews and testimonials: Look for reviews on platforms like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, or Google to see what previous clients have said about the lawyer’s professionalism and success rate in class action lawsuits.
- Ask for references: A reputable lawyer should be able to provide references from past clients who have been involved in class action cases.
- Check for certifications or memberships: Membership in organizations like the American Association for Justice (AAJ) or specific class action sections can indicate the lawyer’s expertise in handling large-scale litigation.
What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?
To get the most out of your first consultation with a class action lawyer, it’s important to come prepared with relevant information and documents. Here’s what you should bring:
- Details of the harm you’ve experienced: Provide a clear explanation of the harm or damages you’ve suffered, whether it’s a defective product, financial loss, or harm due to employment violations.
- Evidence of the issue: Bring any documents, emails, receipts, contracts, or photos that support your claim. If others have experienced the same harm, gather their testimonies or contact information if possible.
- Information about the responsible party: If you know which company, organization, or government entity is responsible, bring any information you have about them, including names, addresses, or prior legal actions.
- Questions about the process: Prepare a list of questions about the class action process, your potential role in the lawsuit, and what you can expect in terms of outcomes and timelines.
- Contact information for other potential class members (if available): If you know others who have been similarly affected, provide their contact information so the lawyer can assess whether they may join the class action.
By preparing thoroughly for your consultation, you can help the lawyer evaluate your case effectively and provide the best legal guidance for pursuing a class action lawsuit.
