Filter by

star star star star star
05 Apr, 2017 by Anonymous
This lawyer is your basic ROOKIE !! He failed my personal injury case !! Only has been practicing law 1 year !! Any seasoned professional would of been familiar with my case and would of known that the city of Los Angeles always denies guilt on the first attempt !! It's a common practice !! I say if it's too hot for you then get out the kitchen !! His staff is horrible - no manners horrible customer service and always seem to be in a rush to get you off the phone ! He dropped my case and didn't even offer to continue working for monetary compensation. Very unprofessional - if you have a case with him I strongly suggest that you choose another firm -I can can honestly tell you that you will probably be JUST AS SORRY as I was when I got the news that my case and physical therapy Where not going to continue !! I spoke to 5 more lawyers that kindly explained my situation in length and advice me that I was not at fault and I will win a case but it will take 2 years and the profit wasn't enough to pick up the case - I CAN RESPECT THE TRUTH !! But like I said please do stay away !! Choose wisely and allow a professional firm represent you !!
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
15 Mar, 2016 by Anonymous
Mr. Hobdy represented me in a serious criminal matter involving felony charges. I'm stubborn, so it took patience for me to trust him through months of preliminary hearings and continuances, but he secured an excellent outcome for me. Mr. Hobdy is a busy guy and clearly well-liked by his colleagues, court personnel and the judicial officers. This is advantageous for solving common discovery, calendaring, and opposing side communications, but is competition for his attention. When you get your turn, Mr. Hobdy answers all your questions, explains the legal procedures and took the time to write everything down that I needed for the next hearing, making sure I understood what had happened before I left the courthouse that day. If you need constant, daily hand-holding, his popularity will make that tough. If you need an attorney who is constantly working on your behalf, in your best interest, I wouldn't trust my freedom to anyone but Mr. Hobdy.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
28 Jan, 2015 by Anonymous
We paid him three thousand dollars, to help with a case. We still needed to go back and forth with this case. In his contract it stated that as long as it did not go to trail he will be at the hearings. But! Instead he states that he have no time he was finished dealing with it and we were on our on. Tried to contacted him for paper work to continue on our on, never no response. Very rude and negative. I will never ever refer him to any one. The way he handles his business is really non-professional.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
26 Sep, 2018 by Max
I hired Andy Turner of the law firm Lagerlof, Senecal, Gosney & Kruse in Pasadena to handle a dispute that I had with my neighbor and his insurance company. For over a year I spent many hours emailing, texting and calling Mr. Turner attempting to get updates on how the case was going. On almost every occasion it took several days to reach him. When he finally did respond it was one excuse after another as to why there was no movement in the case. While little progress was made during the time he handled the case Mr. Turner billed me for more than $15,000 (which I promptly paid) and then he quit when I refused to accept a settlement with terms he agreed to without consulting with me. I reached out to several lawyers who reviewed the case and the attorney I ended up hiring was quite adamant that Mr. Turner made several rookie mistakes. He said with the evidence and paperwork I had provided Turner he should have been able to settle the case within months for more than the amount I was demanding. Andy Turner's ignorance of the law almost caused me to miss a crucial filing deadline that my new attorney caught and dealt with. My new attorney, who unlike Turner has the highest AVVO rating, settled the case in 3 months and charged me the cost of filing the lawsuit and administrative fees. A grand total of $1000. $14,000 less than Turner billed me for accomplishing nothing and quitting the case. I can say, first hand, that Mr. Turner's low AVVO rating is well deserved. Had I taken his AVVO rating into account I never would have hired him and I caution anyone who considers hiring him to think again. I plan to file a complaint with the California Bar Association.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
07 Jun, 2018 by Bobby
In 2014, Nieves' firm, Hunt Ortmann, agreed to represent me in a $112,500 case. Nieves, a partner in the firm, oversaw and guided the two attorneys who worked on my case. Somehow, 4 years later, Hunt Ortmann had billed me roughly $350,000 while recovering less than $10,000. Nieves and his firm handed my case to a brand new attorney (new attorney admitted to CA State Bar the day after I signed my retainer agreement with Hunt Ortmann). Other attorneys have reviewed my bills from Hunt Ortmann and concluded that the new attorney egregiously overbilled me because it seemed I was paying for his on the job training. Nieves' firm mislead me about recoverable attorney fees while pursuing a defendant for 16 months and obtaining zero dollars. Nieves' firm obtained a default judgment only to have the judgment vacated because the firm "STRATEGICALLY DECIDED NOT TO SERVE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ON A MAJORITY OF THE DEFENDANTS". Yes, Nieves' firm, Hunt Ortmann, intentionally failed to serve a first amended complaint. Hunt Ortmann also intentionally mislead the court by asking for that default judgment ON THE COMPLAINT instead of informing the court that a valid and operative first amended complaint existed. Hunt Ortmann made numerous mistakes on my still unresolved case, charged me to try and correct those mistakes, and abruptly threatened to withdraw from my case at the worst possible time. Each of their mistakes are a matter of public record now. The judge informed Nieves' co-workers in person that they should have served a First Amended complaint (common sense), and that they should have asked for a judgment on the amended complaint, not the original complaint. I would not recommend this attorney or this law firm to anyone!
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
03 Dec, 2012 by Anonymous
JP Velasco was hired by Visionary Tax enterprise, who I hired to perform tax help. JP was paid a fee to take my case from Visioinary and is the power of Attorney on record. After working with me for the last year, we get to the end of my case (Offer in Compromise) and appearently VTE went out of business and JP tells me that he is no longer obligated to represent me in this case. I am a single father of 3 and the IRS has now Levied my accounts right before Christmas. I know that anyone with high business ethics, would not leave me in this last hour to get ran over by the IRS and follow thru wtih the obligations he was paid to resolve. I would not hire this attorney, find someone else to represent you for your case.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
19 Apr, 2016 by Anonymous
Hired this attorney for a civil litigation matter in 2013. After i signed his substantial retainer agreement, he immediately started pressuring me for more money. He lost many of my personal evidence documents and was completely unprepared for court, along with arriving late. He failed to reveal to me that he previously worked for the opposing council. He completely lost my case but still kept pressuring me for more money. I would NEVER recommend him to any family member or friend.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
02 Jun, 2013 by Anonymous
Ignorant about the law and a $%#@# to work with. Charges money and does nothing. Worst lawyer I have ever met.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
21 Sep, 2011 by Anonymous
I was a client of Matthew Wailes Goldsby. I am disabled/special needs in trust, absolutely nothing was done for me and my future. My personal experience is that Mr. Matthew Wailes Goldsby is guilty of unprofessional conduct, derelict of duties , incompetence, and malfeasance.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
16 Apr, 2024 by Chris
Do not use Mr. Mijares for your needs. He is slow to respond, always has a family issue as to why he didn't make progress on your claim and will make agreements with you to remedy his faults that are not followed through on. Be wary of anything said on the phone as his paper trail will be intentionally thin so he can operate outside of his word. He is also incapable of doing anything aside from writing letters to and negotiating with insurance companies. He dropped the ball on one case I had with him and agreed to remedy it by waiving his fee on the other. Now that settlement is ready, he has reneged on his agreement.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
26 Sep, 2023 by Anonymous
It was a huge mistake to hire this law firm. Doitch promised to handle my case for $100,000, and now she is demanding a quarter of a million more! She refused to prepare witnesses for their testimony nor did she even prepare me for mine. She ignored my repeated request that she conduct even a basic investigation. She allowed the opposing counsel to attack me loudly and aggressively through a year's worth of hearings and never responded nor protected me.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
14 Jul, 2014 by John
He was very misinformed about employment law, and loved to hear himself speak. I found him to be rather arrogant and politely had to end our conversation in search of a bag to return my meal in. I would never recommend Anthony Segall to represent someone I know or don't know for that matter
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
07 Jun, 2018 by Bobby
Flores, with his firm, Hunt Ortmann, agreed to represent me in a $112,500 case. Somehow, 4 years later, Hunt Ortmann had billed me roughly $350,000 while recovering less than $10,000. Flores and his firm handed my case to a brand new attorney (new attorney admitted to CA State Bar the day after I signed my retainer agreement with Hunt Ortmann). Other attorneys have reviewed my bills from Hunt Ortmann and concluded that the new attorney egregiously overbilled me because it seemed I was paying for his on the job training. Flores mislead me about recoverable attorney fees while pursuing a defendant for 16 months and obtaining zero dollars. Flores obtained a default judgment only to have the judgment vacated because Flores "STRATEGICALLY DECIDED NOT TO SERVE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ON A MAJORITY OF THE DEFENDANTS". Yes, Flores and Hunt Ortmann intentionally failed to serve a first amended complaint. Hunt Ortmann also intentionally mislead the court by asking for that default judgment ON THE COMPLAINT instead of informing the court that a valid and operative first amended complaint existed. Hunt Ortmann made numerous mistakes on my still unresolved case, charged me to try and correct those mistakes, and abruptly threatened to withdraw from my case at the worst possible time. Each of their mistakes are a matter of public record now. The judge informed Flores to his face they should have served a First Amended complaint (common sense), and that he should have asked for a judgment on the amended complaint, not the original complaint. I would not recommend this attorney or this law firm to anyone!
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
22 Apr, 2016 by Anonymous
Hired this attorney back in early 2015. I was pressured into a retainer agreement and left them with 10,000 dollars. This was simply a real estate transaction with no complications. After I paid her, she refused to take any of my phone calls, I was worried that my deal was not going to go thru. She finally called me back saying she was working on it, and demanded more money from me. I was forced to hire another law firm and would never recommend them to anyone!
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

Top Questions to Ask a Lawyer

When meeting with a lawyer for the first time, it's important to ask the right questions to understand their expertise and determine if they're the right fit for your legal needs. Here are some top questions to consider:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. What potential outcomes can I expect from my case?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  4. What is your approach to handling cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. Who will be working on my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the likely timeline for resolving my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What are the strengths and weaknesses of my case?
    Understanding potential challenges helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to solve my legal problem?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  1. Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing.
  2. Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case.
  3. Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association.
  4. Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, or Google to gauge client satisfaction.
  5. Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field.
  6. Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation.
  7. Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  8. Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  1. Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as contracts, correspondence, legal notices, court papers, or evidence.
  2. Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and involved parties.
  3. List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, or the lawyer's experience.
  4. Financial Information:
    If applicable, bring financial documents like pay stubs, tax returns, or bank statements.
  5. Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case.
  6. Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid ID for verification purposes.
  7. Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points.
  8. Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations.

How Much Does a Lawyer Cost?

The cost of hiring a lawyer varies widely based on several factors:

  • Fee Structures:
    • Hourly Rate:
      Lawyers may charge anywhere from $150 to $500 or more per hour, depending on experience and location.
    • Flat Fee:
      For routine legal services like drafting a will or handling an uncontested divorce, lawyers might offer a flat fee.
    • Retainer Fee:
      An upfront payment against which the lawyer bills hourly fees.
    • Contingency Fee:
      Common in personal injury cases; the lawyer receives a percentage (typically 25% to 40%) of any settlement or award.
    • Monthly Retainer:
      For ongoing services, businesses might pay a monthly fee for a set number of hours or services.
  • Factors Affecting Cost:
    • Complexity of the Case:
      More complex cases require more time and resources, increasing costs.
    • Lawyer's Experience:
      Highly experienced lawyers may charge higher fees.
    • Geographic Location:
      Legal fees can vary significantly by region or city.
    • Additional Expenses:
      Court filing fees, expert witness fees, travel expenses, and administrative costs may be extra.
  • Estimating Total Costs:
    Request a detailed fee agreement outlining all potential costs.
    Discuss any additional expenses that may arise during the case.
  • Negotiating Fees:
    Some lawyers may be willing to negotiate fees or offer payment plans, especially for clients with financial constraints.
  • Pro Bono Services:
    For those who cannot afford legal services, some lawyers or legal aid organizations offer services at reduced rates or for free.
Scroll to top