Reviews

Very professional, knowledgeable, and responsive. Highly recommend.

Ms. Nolan updated my uncle's Living Trust years ago and provided valuable assistance to ensure he had everything in order. After his passing last year, I reached out to Ms. Nolan for her help in navigating the Trust distribution and she was extremely helpful, professional and compassionate. She responded to all my questions in a timely manner and was able to guide me through the process with ease. I highly recommend her for all senior legal advice.

Colleen always got back to me quickly and personally. She answered all my questions and kept me apprised of all developments. While long she made the process easy to understand and I always knew she made my best interests a top priority. Would gladly recommend this firm.

They did there job well if you need a good personal injury attorney use them

I have been working with Momkus for 5+ years now and they have handled my general corporate law needs, agreements, state filings, trademark, etc. As a small business owner, I have found them to be responsive and well informed on the matters I bring to them. Their rates are reasonable and not what you will be paying to a large, downtown Chicago law firm with the same quality of professional law advice. My experience with the attorneys is that they are well seasoned and provide practical advice.

I have had a long term business relationship with Momkus, and all of my interactions have been very professional and exemplary. I recommend Momkus for any commercial and personal legal needs.

Our experience with this firm was top notch, would absolutely use them again. Very communicative, worked very hard on our behalf. We worked with Jared Duke, he was outstanding. Highly recommend.

Jim was excellent. He was responsive, professional and helped us navigate the legal process incredibly well. I would recommend this firm to anyone.

Carol prepared my living trust and will. She was wonderful to work with. Extremely prompt, professional and helpful. She took the time to thoroughly explain the parameters of these legal documents. I highly recommend Carol for all estate planning processes.

Without explanation, changed opinion almost immediately after retainer payment. Tried to convince myself that the Conick didn’t have a memory problem, but his memory problem is just one issue. Had to repeat several times and/or refer to typed information/messages the type of documents, witnesses, facts, issues, history, etc. But no matter how many times repeated, Conick continued to demand another repeat. Conick refused and/or failed to answer even a few basic and simple questions. During a ten month period Conick demanded that I produce documents in response to Plaintiffs’ Discovery while concurrently he Conick agreed and allowed Plaintiffs to NOT respond to Discovery questions or produce documents required by them. This would also be concurrent to Plaintiffs’ fictitious court rules claimed in Plaintiffs’ complaint, ignored terms of documents and ignored controlling common law as well as other issues. This is only some of the problems with Conick. 4/12/2021 Reply Edit: Conick’s response sounds so gracious and genuine, but has little to do with reality. Among several issues that Conick’s opinion flip-flopped before and after retention was how to respond to Discovery and his case strategy, but I will withhold argument. Conick’s billing states that in December 2019 finalized Discovery responses were drafted and served upon opposing counsel. Apparently opposing counsel has denied receiving same. Conick was required to file with the court a Notice and service proof concerning the responses but I have not seen same in the Docket. Further, Conick withdrew roughly 8 months later just a half-step ahead of being fired. Among other issues, Conick wouldn’t explain why he changed his case strategy post retention and wouldn’t explain why he continued to pressure me to produce additional documents, thousands of pages, while he allowed no Plaintiffs’ response to interrogatories or production requests. Knowing I had tens of thousands of additional document pages and while Plaintiffs failed to respond, without prior notice Conick demanded I produce all remaining documents within 2 days. Additionally, Conick demanded additional retention funds for future fees. As Conick wouldn’t answer even the simplest couple questions, I refused to send more funds. It was then Conick withdrew. Conick failed to return any of the documents I tendered to him. My original post was careful not to disclose protected attorney-client privileged information, which Conick has breached. Each separately and all above as a whole can constitute basis for complaints with the ARDC, the Circuit Court or both and more. Conick, you won’t be alone for long. Besides why argue the newsworthy.