Reviews

Thank you Neil & Shawn, you did an awesome job!

This lawyer group helped me win my case

Great attorneys and staff! All the employees there that I came in contact with were extremely friendly, courteous, knowledgeable, and very professional. My attorney was Jason Esmond and I highly recommend him! He was very knowledgeable and great to work with. Keep up the great work everyone!

john and david are absolutely amazing at their profession. very timely and thorough and extremely personable. thank the both of you so very much. you've made me so very happy.

Shawn Good and his team take care of his clients. When looking to purchase a home, the importance of a strong team (Realtor, Attorney, Home Inspector and Mortgage Banker) is so valuable. A great team works together to protect the client, inform the client, reduce the stress in a very stressful situation and close on time. Glad to work with someone like Shawn and have him part of my team on a real estate transaction and you should be as well.

I would like to thank Shawn, Neil and the staff for their hard work on my mother's disability case. They are experts at what they do. Shawn represented my mother and fought for her case. He is dedicated and committed to his clients. I can not thank them enough. Their paralegals are very friendly and helpful, they have a great team.

Mr, Hampilos set up my new corporation, which he also represents. Anytime I have a question or a concern, he is readily available. George is very knowledgeable and actually cares about his clients. I feel very fortunate to have him in my corner. His Law firm is highly recommended.

STBX, I find it amusing that HAZLOVE is reviewing my attorney—“the opposing counsel.” Is the intent to discredit George Hampilos? Then her need to review is based on the outcome of the case, and her dissatification of her own attorneys inability to go against a competent attorney. She claims her attorney had to get the judge to validate what George ruled. It is my understanding that judges rule and validate, not attorneys. While HAZLOVE is entitled to her opinion of alledged unethical behavior she claims others agree with her. Are these observers the same discredited witnesses that were artfully and skillfully cross examined by Attorney Hampilos ? Incidentally, the only emotions I have witnessed by George is his sense of humor and incredulity of HAZLOVE's completely irrational actions, words and aberrant behaviors. HAZLOVE professes being on the "receiving end" of his non-professionalism on a few occasions. Those occasions consist of being cross-examined on the witness stand and extremely discredited. During which time her ineffectual lawyers either failed to object or were overruled by the Judge. Is George a fast talker or hyper? George is an excellent reader of human behaviors, and if it is beneficial to his client, he will adjust his cadence to achieve the desired result from their testimony. A good lawyer controls the conversation of the witness on the stand. HAZLOVE'S previous attorneys parted ways because they had no control over their client’s irrational, illogical acts and poor choices—in addition to her unwillingness to settle in the face of insurmountable odds against her. Her attorneys would gladly bill her for travel time and should look forward to a worthy opponent. HAZLOVE'S threat of reporting Attorney Hampilos to the bar is characteristic of her making false claims. She had me arrested for domestic abuse of which a jury exonerated me after 4 minutes of deliberations. Which she followed by filing a order of protection based on 30 year old allegations of deprivation and false claims of drug addictions. (I do not use illicit drugs notwithstanding having been married to her all these years.) This emergency order of protection request was denied by the court. The next day she filed an ethics complaint against our realtor when she disagreed with his testimony of facts. When Judge Young ruled against her testimony and her contempt of court for lying she now suspects judicial bias. As my case is coming to its conclusion I have found George Hampilos to be very aware of the law and quite competent. He is an excellent cross examiner that is capable of arriving at the truth. His ability to get witnesses to self-incriminate, as in my case, the hiding of marital assetts such as stocks, credit cards, etc....Throughout the process I have been advised as to the wisest financial moves regarding fighting over assets. Actually, the Judge admonished her attorney regarding fighting over “trivial assets.” Regardless of the outcome of my case, I would feel quite comfortable recommending George as a top quality attorney

Very knowledgeable on disability related issues. Helped me and my wife immensely! Would highly recommend.