Fred T Isquith

41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY

star star star star star
4.8 / 5
Avvo
5.0
info
Avvo rating
20 Reviews
Google Maps
4.4
info
Google reviews rating
9 Reviews
Data reflects the status as of the latest update. Updates are typically done monthly.

License

License ID number: -

Licensed in: -

Year admitted: -

Education

1971
Columbia Universtiy, LLD
1968
City University of New York, Brooklyn College, BA - Bachelor of Arts

Last reviews

Overall rating
star
star star star star star
4.8 29 reviews
Avvo 5.0
Google Maps 4.4

Bella levshin

star star star star star
08 Apr, 2024
I have contacted an Israeli lawyer regarding a case in Israel. They were very professional and respectful, and provided me with an explanation of Israeli law. I highly recommend this Israeli law firm to anyone living in the US who needs legal assistance from a lawyer in Israel.
Read more Google Maps

A b

star star star star star
14 Jun, 2023
I just recently moved to Israel and was having issues with my apartment and inquired on Israel tenant laws. I contacted Michaels office and within an hour he reached out. He was very professional and was available until my issues were resolved. He didn’t charge me when most would which is very much appreciated!!! I absolutely recommend him to anyone in need of help!
Read more Google Maps

Ruth c.

star star star star star
12 Jan, 2023
I have a question and looking for an answer about this ridiculous dental bill.He provided me a professional advise and I’m satisfied with the given answer. I really appreciate your help 100% satisfaction
Read more Avvo

Top review highlights

Pros
1
Knowledgeable and professional attorney who provides prompt and helpful responses
“This Attorney is very Knowledgeable and Professional. He always responds in a prompt manner and has assisted me with difficult cases.”
2
Provides clear and succinct explanations, even on complex legal topics
“Really appreciate the clear, succinct answer that I couldn't spot or know the terminology of without his kind reply to my questions.”
3
Cares about clients and is willing to spend time consulting without charging
“He spent much time to consult me without charging me. That's quite unusual. It demonstrates that he is really out there helping people, not just making money.”
4
Offers practical and realistic advice tailored to the client's situation
“He did gave me very realistic options to think about and I do thank him for his advice.”
5
Breaks down complex legal matters into simple, understandable issues
“Mr. Isquith broke it down to simple issues and made strong arguments that resulted in a favorable outcome in my case.”
Cons
As a result of the analysis of reviews about this lawyer, no significant cons were found.

Publications

2017:
Securities Mosaic, Defective Process cripples Flawed Clas Action Proposal
2017:
Law 360, Defective Process Cripples Class Action Proposal
2017:
Law 360, Due Porcess: Class Action Certification
2017:
Law 360, ConAgra Opinioni May Repair Ascertainability Circuit Split
2017:
Law 360, Restricting Rights Through Class Action Evisceration
2017:
Law360, Applying California Antitrust Law to Out of State Transactions
2016:
Knowledge Mosaic, Supreme Court Rules on Class Plaintiff "Pick Offs"
2016:
NASCAT, The Class Act
2016:
Knowledge Mosaic, District Court Provides First Guidance on Class Plaintiff "Pick-Offs" After Supreme Court
2016:
Securities Mosaic, Collateral Atacks on Class Action Settlements
2016:
Lexis Securities Mosaic, Supreme Court's Opinion in Tyson Foods allows Statistical Evidnece
2016:
Lexis Securities Mosaic, Confidentiality Orders - Not so Confidential
2016:
Lexis Securities Mosaic, Buried disclosure is Not Public Disclosure
2016:
Lexis Law Mosaic and firm website www.whafh.com, GM and the Survival of Claims Thought to have Been Dischargedin Bankruptcy
2016:
Law 360, Additional Thoughts on Class Plaintiff Pick - Offs
2016:
Law 360, Thoughts On Post-Settlement Claims by Class Members
2016:
Law 360, Why Sanofi Is Required Reading for Securities Attorneys
2016:
Law 360, a Plaintiffs Attorney View of tyson Foods
2016:
Law 360, A Few important Decisoins From the "Inferior" Courts
2016:
Law 360, Summer Session At the Second Circult
2016:
Law 360, Knotty International Problems in the Courts
2015:
Securities Mosaic, Market Check on Legal Fees
2015:
Securities Mosaic, Revlon Standard Modified
2015:
Securities Mosaic, Supreme Court Allows appeal of Cases in Multi-District proceedings
2015:
Securities Mosaic, Forex Decision Changes the Conversation in Antiturst Pleading
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporate Defendant Requres Nuanced Analysis
2015:
Knowldge Mosaic, Class Certification Granted Against Accountant and Advisors to Fund
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Second Circuit: Rule 23 Does not Require Damages to be Measurable on aa Calss wiide bBasis under Rule 23(b)(3)
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Supreme Court to Hear Three Class Action Cases
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Further Commeents on Campbell Ewald v. Gomez
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Further Comments - Spokeo v. Robins
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Omnicare
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Second Circirt.....Rule 23(b)(3)
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Cl;ass Certification Granted Against Accountant
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Jurisdiction over foreign corporate defendants
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Cases in Multi-District Litigation
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Revlon Standard Modified
2015:
Knowledge Mosaic, Market Check on Legal Fees
2015:
NASCAT, The Class Act - EDITOR
2015:
Law 360, After Plaintiffs Win Verdict in Securities Class Actions
2015:
Law 360, Spring Begins With 3 Important Class Action Decision
2015:
Law 360, The Importance of Maaking Fact Based Arguments
2015:
Law 360, Recent Decisions Righten Standards for Merger Litigation
2014:
Knowledge Mosaic, A Note on Harris v amgen
2014:
NASCAT, The Class Act - EDITOR
2014:
Law 360, Amgen Likely o Be Leading Case Affecing ERIAS Pleading
2014:
Law 360, The SEC Needs to Act on Fee Shifting
2014:
Law 360, Readying for a New First Monday
2014:
Law 360, Defendants, not Plaintiffs, Drive up Class Action Costs
2014:
Law 360, Will The Supreme Court Nullify Rule 23
2014:
Law 360, The End of Private Enforcemnet of ERISA Plan Rights
2013:
NASCAT, The Class Act - EDITOR
2013:
Law 360, Thinking Further on Halliburton
2013:
Law 360, State-Mandated Student Pro Bono Programs are Inefficient
2013:
law 360, Spotlight on Spoiliation
2013:
Law 360, More Restrictions fpr ERISA Fiduciaries
2013:
Law 360, Qestionable Constitutionality: Supreme Court's Amex Ruling
2013:
Law 360, How Facebok INforms Exclusive Jurisidiction Provisions
2013:
Law 360, Sui Generis At Supreme Court
2013:
Law 360, Another Look at Amgen
2013:
Law 360, How Not to Plead A Multistate Class Action
2013:
Law 360, How !st Circ Infused Del. Law Decision with Realism
2013:
Law 360, Supreme court Spotlight: Sex, Race And...Commerce
2012:
NASCAT, Class Act - EDITOR
2012:
Law 360, Rule 23 "Preliminary" Requriement As Seen by 7th Circ
2012:
Law 360, Wxhauston - Patent and Copyright And The Supreme Court
2012:
Law 360, Case Study: Roasado v. China North East Petroleum
2012:
Law 360, A Dissection of Rule 23
2012:
Law 360, A 2nd Look At Class Action Requirements
2012:
zLaw 360, The Continued Robustness of Rule 23 (b) (2)
2012:
Law 360, The Simmonds Case (Sec16 Ruling) In the Litigation Context
2012:
Law 360, A Look At Litigated and Settled Class Certification
2012:
Law 360, Concepcion Comands A Case-By-Case Analysis
2012:
Law 360, Dec. 20, 2011 - 2 Big Decisions
2012:
Law 360, Case Study: Damasco v. Clearwire
2011:
NASCAT, Class Act - Editor
2011:
Law 360, Redefining Loss Causation in Mutual Fund Cases
2011:
Law 360, The Delawre Chancery Court aas Corporate Regulator
2011:
Law 360, Case Study: Atkinson v. Morgan Asset Management
2011:
Law 360, 2 Months After Dukes
2011:
Law 360, Interpretation of Arbitration Provision Post- Concepcion
2011:
Law 360, In Context: Recent Class action Jurisprudence
2011:
Law 360, SLUSA And State Court Securities Actions
2011:
Law 360, Interpretation of Arbitration Provision Post-Concepcion
2011:
Law 360, In Context: Recent Class Action Jurisprudence
2011:
Law 360, Addressing Multiforum Deal Litigation
2011:
Law 360, In Re Bear Stearns - 1 Concealment; 3 Results
2011:
Law 360, Is It Material? Depends On Who You Ask
2011:
Law 360, Interlocutory appeals and Twombly in 7th Circ.
2011:
Law 360, Does Decurities Enforcement Make Corps. Stronger?
2010:
NASCAT, Class Act - EDITOR
2010:
Law 360, Interpreting Morrison v. National Australia Bank
2010:
Law 360, The End of Clsas Actions? Not Likely
2010:
Law 360, Tiem For the Supreme Court
2010:
Law 360, 5 Cases Impacting Investors in Public Cos
2010:
Law 360, Del Opinoin to Inform Future Freeze Out Mergers
2010:
Law 360, Case Study: morrison v. National Austrailia Bank
2010:
Law 360, Spring Supreme court roundup
2010:
Law 360, Clarifying Jurisdiction For foreign Claimants
2010:
Law 360, A 3rd And 4th Look At The Bank of America Opinion
2010:
Law 360, Securities Case Filings Remain Steady in Q1
2010:
Law 360, WhitherThe SEC? For Now, No Place New
2010:
Law 360, Citizens United: A Congressional Opportunity
2009:
Securities Docket, new Ruling on Rating Agency Responsibility Bears Close Scrutiny
2009:
NASCAT, Class Act - EDITOR
2008:
NASCAT, Class ACt - EDITOR
2007:
Securities Class Action Services, A SEC Monopolly Will Not Work
2002:
Paper Given to SRI Conference, A Acalpel in Your Hand: Litigation as a Tool
2000:
Federal Civil Practice, Class Actions and other Representative Actions
2000:
New York State Bar Association, Federal Civil Practice Supplement
2000:
New York City Bar Association, Anatomy of a Deposition . . . Complex Financial Case
1995:
NASCAT, Class Act - EDITOR
1994:
Post Arbitaration Remedies for an Introduction to Securities Arbitration, Post Arbitarion Remedies
1994:
American Conference Institute, A Plaintiffs' Lawyer Examines Limtied Partnership Roll ups
See more

Best lawyers in New York, NY

See more
star star star star star
13 Oct, 2020 by Tetiana
Highly satisfied with my experience. Judith Weil is thorough professional, accessible, diligent and easy to talk to which is also very important. Consultation I got was prompt and very informative. She educated me on what to expect and what likely outcome would be and thus I was able to make an informed decision. I would definitely recommend Judith Weil and Epstein & Weil LLC
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
19 Jun, 2020 by An
I highly recommend Epstein & Weil Law firm to anyone who are looking for legal help! I was successfully represented by this firm for the different matters of the years. They worked hard for me and achieved good results. I always experienced individual approach to my case, understanding and support. I will always appreciate them for saving my life.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
12 May, 2020 by Brooke
Judith is my company's business attorney and is very well versed in what she does. Plus, she is understanding and thoughtful in her solutions to anything that could arise. She recently assisted us with a client issue that came up unexpectedly and it was resolved successfully. I doubt that we would have been able to resolve the issue without her assistance.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
15 Jan, 2016 by Peter
David consulted with us on a recent Breach of Contract case. He was professional and insightful and took the time to really understand the situation and the outcome we were looking for. It was very clear that he had our best interests in mind, not just some sort of settlement/resolution that would be easier or convenient for him. A true professional and look forward to working with him again.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
12 Jun, 2020 by David
I was a former MD in finance, & after 30+ years of marriage, at just under 60 yrs. old, I retained Donald early 2015. My court approved final consensual settlement was processed in December 2019. (Timing was my ex's fault, she explored 3 attorneys in sequence.) I got to know Don fairly well over that time. He prefers a consensual agreement between parties, NOT court battles. - i suspect that his style minimizes the parties' angst, and doesn't maximize his billable hours per case. Speaking of which, he bills in 1/10 hour increments... and I found his bills always accurate and fair. (I've worked with lots of law firms professionally). Donald was always calm and cool even when I found retracing repeat issues with my ex supremely frustrating. He never fanned the flames. Importantly, because of some odd investments I had, Don was quick and effective at reaching tax, finance and accounting specialists whose input we needed to factor into our settlement. Weird bottom line, If I ever had to get divorced again, [which I will never never] I'd retain Donald.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
04 May, 2016 by Steven
I highly recommend Don as a divorce attorney. From the beginning he showed himself to be a man of integrity and knowledge. Unlike other attorneys, Don was not out to try to run up a bill that was not necessary. He advised me to try to work out as much as possible with my ex-spouse before getting him involved. He is somebody who I was always able to count on and I always knew that my interests were primary in his negotiations.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
04 May, 2016 by Gloria
I did not know of Don at the time of my divorce; however, when my attorney was retiring, he referred me to Don. I had numerous issues with my ex-husband an Don took the control and stress from me. He quickly diffused the situation and was instrumental in ensuring my children's welfare.
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

What Questions Should I Ask Before Hiring a Lawyer?

Hiring the right lawyer is crucial for the success of your case. Here are some important questions to ask during your initial consultation:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. Who will be handling my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  4. What is your approach to resolving cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. What potential outcomes can I expect?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the expected timeline for my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What challenges do you foresee in my case?
    Understanding potential obstacles helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to resolve my legal issue?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

Can a Lawyer Represent Me in Courts Outside of New York, New York?

Whether a lawyer can represent you in courts outside of your city or state depends on their licensure and the jurisdiction of the court:

  • Within the Same State:
    Lawyers licensed in a particular state can typically practice anywhere within that state, including all cities and counties. They can represent you in both state and federal courts located in that state.
  • Outside of Their Licensed State:
    If your case is in a different state, the lawyer must be licensed in that state to represent you. However, there are exceptions:
    • Pro Hac Vice Admission: An out-of-state lawyer can request special permission to represent a client in a specific case in another state. This requires filing a motion with the court and often working in conjunction with a local attorney.
    • Federal Courts: If your case is in federal court, a lawyer licensed in any state may be able to represent you, provided they are admitted to practice in that particular federal court.
  • International Representation:
    For cases outside the United States, different rules apply, and the lawyer may need to comply with the foreign country's legal requirements or collaborate with local counsel.

It's important to discuss your specific situation with the lawyer to determine if they can represent you in the desired jurisdiction and what steps may be necessary to do so.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  • Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing. Most state bar websites have an online directory for this purpose.
  • Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case. Review their website, professional profiles, and case history.
  • Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association's records.
  • Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, Google, or Yelp to gauge client satisfaction and experiences.
  • Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field and adherence to high ethical standards.
  • Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation in the legal community.
  • Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  • Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can speak to their abilities and professionalism.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  • Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as:
    • Contracts or agreements
    • Correspondence (emails, letters, texts)
    • Legal notices or court papers
    • Financial records (if applicable)
    • Evidence (photos, videos, receipts)
  • Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and parties involved. This helps the lawyer quickly understand the context.
  • List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, fees, or the lawyer's experience.
  • Financial Information:
    If your case involves financial matters, bring relevant documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bank statements, or invoices.
  • Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case, including their names and contact information.
  • Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid photo ID for verification purposes.
  • Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points discussed.
  • Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations so the lawyer can provide appropriate guidance on fees and payment options.
  • Openness and Honesty:
    Be prepared to discuss your case candidly. Full disclosure allows the lawyer to give accurate advice and anticipate potential challenges.
Scroll to top