Top Washington Consumer Protection Lawyers

Nicholas A Reynolds

1420 5th Ave Ste 2200, Seattle, WA

Appeals Business Consumer Protection +3 +6

3.6/5

3.6

6 Reviews

25 Apr, 2024 by Allen lowery

There the bést añd tóók my case with no money down ór àny payments uñtil we wiñ wiçh they hàve çontacted Dódge experts to testify and everything very prompt and get down to all the right facs there's no way can loose when the other gúys don't have the éxperts

15 Mar, 2024 by Andrew williams

27 Oct, 2023 by Lexi poborsky

Benjamin J Stone

1111 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA

Consumer Protection +1

3.6/5

3.6

6 Reviews

21 Apr, 2015 by John h

Ben's recommendations of endless depositions, motions, bate-stamping, experts, etc tallied up to astronomical monthly bills that we paid under the belief that we would see justice in the courtroom. We went to court and 'won' absolutely nothing. Not even close. We spent more money on litigation than we could ever hope to recover in any settlement. Now that the case is over, absolutely nothing has changed in our predicament. In fact, its gotten worse while our legal 'family' just walks away - with our money of course. As for opposing counsel stating 'hiring Ben to represent me', I'd think twice. You were/are an awesome attorney in the courtroom and though not on the same side as us, we recognized your obvious expertise. I'd recommend YOU in a heartbeat.

04 Apr, 2015 by Natalie

My Name is Natalie and as HR Director for 5000 employee’s I can tell you how important it is to find the right employment counsel for those times when needed. Ben Stone, Attorney at law has been the right counsel for the issues that our business has encountered. On numerous times he has guided us through the maze and complexities of employment law. He is vigilant and carefully balances compliance regulations to prevent liabilities along with business goals and needs most importantly he always diligently defends your cases if and when the need arises. The polite mannerism and professional interaction bestowed upon us by Ben is another important aspect that should not go unsaid. I recommend Ben Stone to anyone who wants to have an excellent employment counsel and business relationship that will lead to a successful outcome. Natalie R, PHR HR Director,

01 Apr, 2015 by Linda

I could not have asked for a better experience with an employment law attorney than with Ben Stone. The circumstances of my case were complex, sensitive, and personally extremely important to me. Ben was strategic in his approach, clear/wise. He listened carefully to what mattered most to me. He crafted an effective path forward that was consistent with my values. He carefully tracked the details of the case and was always prepared for the next step forward. He was always very timely in his responses to my emails and phone calls. Throughout our work together, Ben would always lay out very clearly the different approaches we might take, and the pros/cons for each. He was balanced in his counsel and willing to fully support my decision. I could not have asked for a better experience and person to assist.

Erin Helen Winkles

1424 16th Ave, Longview, WA

Business Child Support Consumer Protection +6 +9

3.6/5

3.6

5 Reviews

08 May, 2024 by Matt

I cannot say enough good things about Erin. I read the other reviews and well the bad ones make me think she dodged a bullet. She was fantastic in my real estate case and even returned my calls on the weekend. She came out to my property on a Sunday and I did not see it on my bill and she said "happy birthday"; it was not my birthday. Great results!! She is down to earth, wore a megadeath hoodie and flip flops, then won my case in a suit jacket, but I am pretty sure she still had the megadeath hoodie on. She was even nice to my neighbor who I was arguing with. We all ended up coming up with a solution. She told me, "I can take your money, but you might as well spend it on yourself, lets find a cheaper solution." and we did.

31 Oct, 2023 by Anonymous

Ms. Winkles shoots from the hip, assumes things and speaks without specific knowledge on the topic. She also seems all about the money. If she smells that you can’t afford her long term she’ll drop you like a bad habit.

04 Feb, 2022 by Justin

Where do I start at how helpful and amazing Erin and her team are. Erin took me in after our consultation and stayed with me threw my whole case. Erin and her team where very good at what they did for me. I would recommend Erin to anyone.

Daniel Andrew Rogers

19929 Ballinger Way, Seattle, WA

Consumer Protection Intellectual Property Probate +1 +4

3.6/5

3.6

3 Reviews

25 May, 2016 by Sue

We hired Daniel Rogers to represent us in a property line dispute. The duration of our contact was 4 months. I give Dan the highest recommendation as he guided us through the laws that impacted our situation which turned in to an adverse possession of what was originally our property. but now legally was our neighbor's. What I appreciated most was his ability to listen to and understand my concerns and feelings; then with sensitivity he explained the law, talked about our options, and interfaced with the other party's attorney. When I questioned his ideas he worked diligently to answer all of our questions. Even though the final outcome was not what I hoped for, in hindsight it was the best solution. Dan was so patient with us and he was right in his advice. We were not the easiest clients to handle, but Dan navigated our case very well. Because of Dan we have a deeper understanding of the law. Without hesitation we will employ Dan again if we need legal counsel.

01 Jul, 2015 by Maynard

I initially worked with Dan over a year ago regarding a dispute with a previous employer with which I needed some guidance. Dan was professional, honest, and extremely responsive in helping me resolve this matter. He had a clear legal understanding of the issues at hand, was very fair in how he billed his time for me, and always replied to my phone calls and emails within 24 hours. Additionally, Dan was incredible about proactively reaching out to me to keep me informed every time something happened, whether or not it required action on my part. I was so happy with my experience that when I needed a lawyer to review a contract for a business opportunity that emerged, Dan was the first call I made. While my first experience was good, my second experience was even more impressive. The contract negotiations for this opportunity came right up against a deadline and Dan went above and beyond to make sure that everything was completed on time (I believe he even worked over the weekend to accomplish everything). My experiences with Dan have been so good that I have not hesitated to refer him to my family, friends, and clients. If you are ever in need of an honest, trustworthy, and knowledgeable attorney, Dan is your guy. I look forward to doing more business with him as needed in the future.

08 Apr, 2015 by Anonymous

For nearly a year Dan Rogers was working my wrongful termination case. In that time frame he acquired absolutely no useful or beneficial discovery from the opposition while diligently meeting their every demand. His inexperience and naive nature allowed him to bullied and swayed by both opposing counsel and his own management to the detriment of his client and case. Often during our tenure working together Dan Rogers would contact me detailing a discovery he had made in the case. Each and every one of these discoveries was something that I had already explained to him months prior. Usually more than once. Ultimately I was told that my input and opinion were not needed in my own case because I was not an attorney and therefore could not understand the process. After alienating most of the witnesses and getting one terminated my case had been damaged almost beyond repair. I warned Dan Rogers about the negative possibility of each one of these aspects and was ignored at every turn. He proceeded against my advice and the result was predictable.

Scott R. Peterson

648 S 152nd St Ste 7, Burien, WA

Consumer Protection Debt Collection Real Estate +3

3.6/5

3.6

3 Reviews

05 Aug, 2012 by Anonymous

This lawyer would not follow through and when asked about projects, when I could finally reach him, he would have one excuse after another as to why my case was not important to him. He cost a fortune for very little.

25 Oct, 2010 by Robert

I used Mr. Peterson on an eviction. He anticipated every defense and was ready to counter each one. He kept the cost down, while letting me know what this action could potentially cost. I've used other real estate attorneys for evictions, but none were better. I'll use him for all my future real estate work AND my evictions.

29 Aug, 2009 by Anonymous

I was about to be evicted and thrown into the street. It was snowing and cold last winter when this happened. I called Scott a friend recomended me. I had no money and he did it Pro Bono. Thank god for him!

Adolfo Ojeda-Casimiro

28530 Ne Roney Rd, Duvall, WA

Consumer Protection Immigration +2

3.1/5

3.1

10 Reviews

27 Nov, 2023 by Anonymous

I wouldn’t even give this lawyer a one star! He does nothing he is so disrespectful and threatens people. His License should be revoked and no one should hire him find someone new all he wants is the money and doesnt do his job right. Worst person on earth.

25 Jan, 2018 by Erika

Adolfo has represented my husband now for eight years. My husband's case is extremely complicated, but Adolfo is very knowledgeable in immigration law, and because of him my husband is still here. Here is a good example of how honest he is: When I first met him my husband was detained, and Adolfo told me from the get-go he did not think my husband would be eligible to get out on a bond, and if he did get out he said it would be at least $10,000 . My husband did get out on a bond for $5000. As you can see he was completely honest, and has been throughout the eight years he has represented my husband. We are honored to have him as our lawyer.

31 Jul, 2017 by Kali

I hired Ojeda as our immigration attorney after having reached out to and talking with four other highly rated attorneys. I finally hired him after having to fire an attorney that was rated 10 here on Avvo. I'm so thankful I found Ojeda through word of mouth, it changed everything! I've never had to go through anything like this, it's confusing, and overwhelming. It's honestly scary to have to trust someone you don't know to handle something so big, so important. There's a reason people will tell you to hire him. He's honest, he's real, he works hard, and he's insanely knowledgeable. And he was willing to share that knowledge with us, even about little things like how to visit or send things. He knew so much more than the other attorneys, and he has the experience and wins in court to back that knowledge up. If your loved one is in there, have them ask around. They will tell though how good he is, and how many cases he is winning and how many people he had helped. We are so thankful to Ojeda and I will tell everyone who needs a great immigration attorney to hire him, because that is what he truly is. If you read this Ojeda, thank you thank you thank you for how much you have done for us so far and everything you are still doing.

Ambur L Hoffmann

1191 2nd Ave Ste 1800, Seattle, WA

Business Consumer Protection +2

3.0/5

3.0

8 Reviews

17 Feb, 2023 by Anil cortez

I'd go with a firm more experienced

16 Feb, 2023 by Ron ronron

Not a good experience.

16 Feb, 2023 by Fifi nono

Calvin P. Vance

4711 S Pittsburg St, Spokane, WA

Business Consumer Protection Personal Injury +1 +4

3.0/5

3.0

6 Reviews

23 May, 2019 by Anonymous

This guy was incredibly unprofessional. He began by asking my age and then asking if I get menopausal, moody... like his wife (he also used a few swear words to describe his wife). He was extremely unprofessional, rude, condescending and arrogant. He kept talking about himself and how good he was, then would ask me a question about my case, then interrupt me mid sentence and begin talking about himself again. His conversation was incoherent, random, and uninformed. Finally, when he began outright criticizing me I just hung up on him. I would never trust him to work for me.

09 Jun, 2014 by Adam

He overcharged, charged for phone calls about his dating life and did not have organized trial notebooks. He talked bad about all of his old clients as well. I heard all kinds of stuff I probably should not have.

31 Jan, 2011 by Anonymous

Hired him for my moldy house. Overcharged me and charged me for work he didn't do. Very unprofessional and unreliable attorney. He likes to talk about himself and is very egotistic. He even asked my wife out too. I ended up firing this attorney and found someone much better & professional who got the job done in less time.

Jamie Robyn Graves-Haslam

500 W 8th St Ste 275, Vancouver, WA

Consumer Protection Family Law Foreclosure +1 +4

3.0/5

3.0

2 Reviews

06 Apr, 2021 by Anonymous

Jamie Robyn Graves-Haslam helped me obtain an order of protection. She was very professional. She was extremely helpful in answering my multitude of questions. I was impressed how timely was in her responses to me and not only did she provide superb legal assistance and representation she also showed me she truly cared. Her compassion towards me and my case made going through the process much less stressful. Anyone that has her as a lawyer will be very lucky because she is great at what she does and she is compassionate about helping others.

12 Jun, 2018 by Anonymous

As a long distance Co parent who is disabled and unable to travel, I consulted with and subsequently hired this attorney to do a writ of habeas after child was kept from returning home. That was 3-2016. I still haven't seen my child. She could have been the key to getting an autistic child home but now his location is unknown. She took the case, left out of the country a week later for a week, came back to my panic over new information (allehe'd and false) but refused to check info. Instead withdrew and stated they were too busy to take me on. Since that time I've been unable to gain confidence to go pro se or hire another atty due to severe anxiety and fear.

Claire Loebs Davis

1420 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA

Consumer Protection +1

3.0/5

3.0

8 Reviews

11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski

I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!

05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz

I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.

26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu

I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time. She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up. Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home. Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant. Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home: In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service). Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."

Douglas Wesley Greene

1420 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA

Business Class Action Consumer Protection +3

3.0/5

3.0

8 Reviews

11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski

I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!

05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz

I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.

26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu

I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time. She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up. Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home. Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant. Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home: In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service). Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."

Daniel J Goodman

1420 5th Ave Ste 4200, Seattle, WA

Business Consumer Protection Intellectual Property +3

3.0/5

3.0

8 Reviews

11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski

I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!

05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz

I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.

26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu

I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time. She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up. Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home. Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant. Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home: In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service). Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."

Michelle Geri Farris

11300 Roosevelt Way NE., Seattle, WA

Business Consumer Protection Criminal Defense +3 +6

2.3/5

2.3

3 Reviews

12 Dec, 2018 by Leif madsen

i was referred to Kerry Richards by a friend who also had a great experience. Kerry Richards is a saint. saved me and my son. i owe to him all the little moments i get to experience as i watch my son grow everyday. we finalized everything almost three years ago and writing this still brings tears to my eyes. there is nothing more important than family, and i wouldnt trust mine with anyone else.

15 Aug, 2018 by Rob fulwell

09 Feb, 2015 by Lori sherman

Do not use Joel Bradshaw to be the lawyer for a irrevocable trust. The trustee would not give an accounting or bank statements and receipts to the beneficiaries, which is required by law, and Joel Bradshaw defended the trustee instead of the beneficiaries. He must not have informed the trustee of the law. The law requires the trustee to look out for the best interest of the beneficiaries not use the trust money in whatever way they please. Mr. Bradshaw also told beneficiaries the trustee could not produce the bank statements because they were in "storage". I guess he never heard of "online banking".

Todd Tyler Williams

1001 4th Ave Ste 3900, Seattle, WA

Civil Rights Consumer Protection Criminal Defense +1 +4

1.0/5

1.0

1 Reviews

03 Feb, 2022 by Dana

I hired Todd Williams at Corr Cronin in Seattle Washington and it was a absolute disaster. He sold me on paying a larger retainer fee and then proved to be totally incompetent. He also missed a court deadline for an appearance and caused a default judgment to be entered. Avoid this Attorney and firm at all costs. They are just in it for the money.

Robert J. Curran

1201 3rd Ave Ste 3400, Seattle, WA

Appeals Business Consumer Protection +2 +5

1.0/5

1.0

1 Reviews

28 Feb, 2015 by Anton

I hired him to represent me when one of my suppliers left. He fabricated a legal claim as to why the supplier couldn't leave. It was false and ineffective. Now I'm out revenue and I'm paying a big bill. Worst lawyer ever.

Christopher Brunetti

715 Tacoma Ave S, Tacoma, WA

Consumer Protection Government Real Estate +3

1.0/5

1.0

1 Reviews

11 Jun, 2015 by Dolores diaz

Never did waft he said. He took 3 years to finalize and easy divorce and blamed it on my ex. He took forever to update my decree every time we got together, he took 4 months each time to contact me again with new answers from my ex. He took 8 months do filed my house deed after I got divorced. Don't use this attorney. He is very unprofessional.

Patrick Johnson

7017 16th Ave Ne, Seattle, WA

Business Consumer Protection +2

1.0/5

1.0

1 Reviews

21 Apr, 2017 by Anonymous

Showed up late for court and was unprepared

Adam Leonard Barnett

605 5th Ave S Ste 400, Seattle, WA

Business Consumer Protection Government +1 +4

1.0/5

1.0

1 Reviews

19 Oct, 2023 by Jean baptiste mendy

Joanna Otero

401 2nd Ave S., Seattle, WA

Business Consumer Protection Elder Law +3 +6

1.0/5

1.0

1 Reviews

31 Jul, 2024 by Ashley

The whole thing she is done nothing but ignore me. I have an animal, but I was charged for every land they had parts of, etc., etc. but the worst part is I gave her evidence and every bit of everything is habit for me. I’m disabled and I need thatto know what she has the audacity to tell me Hi Ashley, Preparing a letter for you to send to your landlord is the full extent of service that I can offer you. I do not have the capacity to represent you and send a letter in my name. I will be closing your file at this time. You are welcome to call CLEAR again in the future should you need legal advice (call 888-201-1014). If you have an eviction-related matter, you may call our Eviction Defense Screening Line at 855-657-8387. We also have many self-help publications available on many legal topics at www.washingtonlawhelp.org. Sincerely, Joanna Otero, Attorney Northwest Justice Project 401 2nd Ave. S., Suite 407 Seattle, WA 98118 Phone: 206-707-0871 Fax: 888-201-9736 www.nwjustice.org | www.washingtonlawhelp.org Combating Injustice • Strengthening Communities • Protecting Human Dignity If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. The information contained in this email message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. it’s crazy because she never truly said representation she would never. Why do you throw cases if you’re not gonna treat people with the same compassion that you treat somebody Or their services this is her name was given to me, from Northwest Project JUSTICE, and has the audacity to basically tell me she never represented me and was never representing me. That was the whole point of her being involved, but instead another person to abuse my right and give me further behind when she put up the letter addressing the situation, but I gave everybody fruit that I want is wrong about, truly disgust me