Lawyers map
>2.7k
experienced lawyers
Filter by
04 Oct, 2024 by Phyllis cox
They the Best
Read more
04 Oct, 2024 by Gemma arthur
04 Oct, 2024 by Joslyn keels
They are very kind and helpful they are also very consistent with getting the work done!!
Read more
04 Oct, 2024 by Phyllis cox
They the Best
Read more
04 Oct, 2024 by Gemma arthur
04 Oct, 2024 by Joslyn keels
They are very kind and helpful they are also very consistent with getting the work done!!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
20 Jun, 2024 by Rachel macleod
JoAnna J. Smith, who is a Family Law Attorney, Mediator, and Guardian Ad Litem, who works for this firm, was our mediator during the divorce proceedings in June 2024. I did not want to review the law firm itself, just the individual, Ms. JoAnna J. Smith, but, I did not see an option in Google review to add a review just for this individual, thus, I will apologize in advance.
In the Mediation agreement both parties signed, and what I have been informed in regard to the responsibilities of a mediator, they are supposed to be unbiased. Which means, what was said and volunteered by the other party, should not have had any effect or influence during the process, nor should JoAnna have tried to persuade myself and my attorney to make decisions that was not best for myself. I also volunteered information as to what I have been through prior to the divorce and what was taken from me, emotionally and financially, etc, but JoAnna was still prejudicial against me.
It was very clear to myself and even my attorney agreed by making a statement, "after all my years as an attorney, I've never heard a mediator being blatantly biased," which JoAnna seemed very vocal in siding with the 'Respondent,' as I was the 'Petitioner.' During this time, my attorney should have asked her to recuse herself from this mediation and ask for another mediator, which I would have been willing to pay extra money if we needed another mediator, but, that was not the case.
In the Mediation agreement, the mediator is not supposed to 'give any legal advise,' she verbally stated to the Petitioner that it was not a good option for the Respondent to either re-fi the house, nor sell the house, nor Heloc a loan and stated the Respondent does not have the funds and should not proceed with anyone of these options. As the Petitioner, I was not asking a lot of money, but, that did not seem to matter with JoAnna. JoAnna explained the process of Heloc a loan, and we wanted to pursue other avenues, but she was sounding like the Respondent's lawyer.
Yes, I agree my attorney should have strongly voiced other avenues to benefit myself, but, since he heard how blatantly the mediator was biased, he should have also asked her to recuse herself from this mediation. Divorce is hard enough, and having professional people that are supposed to be unbiased, was tougher for me through the divorce proceedings and I felt like JoAnna didn't care what I had been through, and she showed it by vocalizing her opinion and her 'legal advise.'
Read more
13 Mar, 2024 by Libby forrester
As a loan officer the real estate attorney pays a vital role in a speedy and smooth process to closing on time. I’ve only had professional and exceptional experiences with Parast Law. The office has a positive vibe and my clients feel prioritized, important, and well taken care of. Thank you for being a great partner Parast Law.
Read more
02 Mar, 2024 by Sean carpenter
A great experience for my client and a big help as they bought their dream home in Woodstock!
Read more
11 Sep, 2024 by Selena munoz
I recently had the pleasure of working with Corey Raines of Raines Legal Group and his Senior Paralegal Kennedi Spears, and I cannot express how satisfied I am with the experience. From the very beginning, they demonstrated an unmatched level of professionalism. Every interaction was handled with the utmost respect and care, making me feel valued and heard throughout the entire process.
What stood out most was Corey and Kennedi's impeccable communication. They ensured I was kept informed at every stage, patiently explaining complex legal jargon in a way that was easy to understand. This transparency and clarity provided me with peace of mind, knowing I was in capable hands.
Corey Raines truly goes above and beyond for his clients. He meticulously examined every detail of my case and fought tirelessly to ensure the best possible outcome. I highly recommend Corey Raines for anyone seeking an attorney who exemplifies professionalism and excellent communication skills.
Read more
27 Jun, 2024 by Janyl ventura
Cory was a great attorney that really helped me in my time of need. This was the first car accident I was involved in and Cory was able to assist by communicating step by step what the property and personal injury process was going to be like. Cory helped coordinate my medical care by referring me to amazing practices to help with my recovery. Cory was able to negotiate medical bills on my behalf and against the insurance company to ensure I received fair compensation! I highly recommend!
Read more
26 Jun, 2024 by Erin katke
21 Jan, 2024 by Omotola oladapo
16 Mar, 2023 by Brady gough
10 Feb, 2023 by Lisa maydwell
The lecture on Mansa Musa was fascinating. The university is beautiful and the greeters are friendly and helpful.
Read more
04 Dec, 2023 by Catina wilson
25 Sep, 2023 by Rm scott
This firm provides A+++ value-added legal services. Corporate, Technology, Real Estare, Healthcare, to name a few practice areas.
Read more
19 Jul, 2023 by Jenny phillips
04 Dec, 2023 by Catina wilson
25 Sep, 2023 by Rm scott
This firm provides A+++ value-added legal services. Corporate, Technology, Real Estare, Healthcare, to name a few practice areas.
Read more
19 Jul, 2023 by Jenny phillips
14 Oct, 2024 by Dinirio moore
26 Oct, 2023 by Tiffany ford
Easy process when buying a house. Everything was ready to be signed when I arrived. I left with my keys
Read more
30 Jun, 2023 by Diana martin
They have been spam calling me! I owe no money and have great credit! Consider this a drop dead letter!
Read more
14 Dec, 2023 by Kim bright
The legal team at Thomas Kennedy is second to none! I've watched them fight and win maximum settlements for everyday people, changing their lives forever. Highly recommend this compassionate, black-owned law firm who's serious about integrity and excellence.
Read more
07 Sep, 2023 by Coco nut
19 Apr, 2023 by J.gilman
I served as a juror on a case that Woody tried and he did a great job. From the beginning, he basically ran the courtroom, was very engaging, personable, and all the jurors liked him. Kristal was also impressive and it was a pleasure to watch them work.
Read more
14 Dec, 2023 by Kim bright
The legal team at Thomas Kennedy is second to none! I've watched them fight and win maximum settlements for everyday people, changing their lives forever. Highly recommend this compassionate, black-owned law firm who's serious about integrity and excellence.
Read more
07 Sep, 2023 by Coco nut
19 Apr, 2023 by J.gilman
I served as a juror on a case that Woody tried and he did a great job. From the beginning, he basically ran the courtroom, was very engaging, personable, and all the jurors liked him. Kristal was also impressive and it was a pleasure to watch them work.
Read more
29 Jun, 2024 by Dasha harden
I called in about four to five weeks ago and spoke with a Cassandra in reference to the loss of function in my great toe due to a doctors negligence. Cassandra laughed at me when I explained to her my situation, Cassandra also explained to me that it’s “all about money” when it comes to the business. A few days after I posted my review on Google Mr.Malone reached out to me condemning her actions and explaining to me how it works, and essentially it is about the money because it can cost almost 500k to get your case started. After talking with him I removed my review from google because he seemed sincere. However I just want someone to understand for me it’s the principle and not about the money. I sent all my records over to Mr.Malone around 06/04/2024 and sent an email on 06/22/2024 for an update. Mr.Malone informed me that he would look over my files and get back with me in about a week and if he couldnt help he would refer me to someone who possibly would be able to. I have not heard back, and I’m done, basically if you didn’t lose a limb your case will not be taken seriously and the doctor can do anything to you with no consequences. It’s really sad that everytime I’ve needed a workplace enviorment lawyer or a negligence lawyer this is the energy I have gotten. If you only signed up for the more lucrative cases you’re already doing it wrong. I’m just going to leave this firm to itself. I am leaving my review up and cutting contact. Hopefully I can find someone who is willing to do it for the right reasons. This has been very traumatic for me and I just want someone that is doing it for the right reasons.
Read more
05 Jun, 2024 by Joy d.
Adam is amazing!
Read more
04 Nov, 2022 by Alexis johnson
I have known Attorney Scott Williamson now for 10 years and whenever I need an attorney he is who I called. Scott is client focused and result driven, but he is also honest and transparent with you throughout every step of your case. I am honored to call him my attorney, friend and now mentor. If you are looking for an attorney look no further than Scott Williamson.
Read more
16 Jan, 2015 by Nicholas
Attorney Joshua G. Davis was an absolute pleasure to work with. After accepting my case, he assessed all possible scenarios before moving forward. Attorney Davis is a true professional, and he definitely gave me total confidence in his abilities. The lines of communication remained solid throughout my case therefore always keeping me informed on the status of my case. Thus, I highly recommend Attorney Joshua G. Davis to anyone in need of judicial representation and consultation.
Read more
16 Jan, 2015 by Pamela
Mr. Davis was so professional & so knowledgeable in my case, the company I was dealing with had to tell me how good he was in handling my case. He got my caee down from $30,000.00 to $6.000.00 now tell me what attorney can do that... And he still was not satisfied with that . He said he did not want me to pay anything....I would recommend him to the White House if I could....
Read more
15 Jan, 2015 by Kris
Attorney Davis handled my case with care and diligence as if it where his own allowing me to be involved in each part of the case and giving me a through explanation of what each part of the bankruptcy case entailed. While proceeding with my bankruptcy case I have felt at ease and confident that I will not have any troubles and that is all attributed to Attorney Davis, I would highly recommend his services to any person that I encounter and in fact have referred colleagues and friends to utilize his services.
Read more
07 Jun, 2019 by Marcus dunbar
Sanjay Patel is one of the best real estate attorney's in Atlanta. He has been able to close with less than 3 days notice many times and his staff is very helpful especially Keiara. Sanjay is very knowledgable and helpful. Sanjay has a very caring heart and likes to get to know his clients. I have worked with Sanjay since 2017 and he is always our go-to attorney.
Read more
13 Aug, 2015 by Larrie
Sanjay got off to a slow start but when moved into action he was customer service oriented as he came to my location to conduct the closing.
Read more
17 Nov, 2011 by Sheldon
Super sharp, knowledgeable real estate and real estate investment lawyer, Sanjay cuts quickly to the chase and knows the ins & outs of a real estate deal. I've used him and referred him for years...especially for metro Atlanta real estate investors. I always use him on foreclosure purchases to review title...even when I am stuck using the seller's attorney to close. He looks out for his clients and is well worth his fee.
Read more
12 Jun, 2024 by I.y. wade
To be clear, the young lady who answers the phone is very polite, courteous, and professional, but the assistant Lane Ryan is a disgrace to the legal field. She is extremely rude and extremely Unprofessional! If not for the fact that I do not want to take off and go to court I would not deal with this law office. She not only got loud with me, but she accused me of being loud with her
She then hung up the phone on me. When I called back and asked to speak to an attorney, a Mr. John Swann picked up the phone and had a smug tone as well. I wish that we were able to give this law firm negative stars!!! I wonder if they're not just a bunch of ambulance chasers. They must be the bottom of the barrel!
Read more
22 Jan, 2024 by Tyquez handy
The assistant is very rude she was yelling at me when I spoke to her over the phone and I asked her why she was yelling she stated " "I haven't heard yelling yet" I was very unprofessional. I don't think they deserve one star.
Read more
27 Apr, 2023 by Arabia umrani
Great to work with.
Read more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers
What a Real Estate Lawyer Can Do for You
A real estate lawyer provides legal assistance in transactions and disputes involving property, including residential and commercial real estate. Whether you're buying, selling, leasing, or developing property, a real estate attorney can help ensure that your transactions are legally sound and your rights are protected. They review contracts, perform due diligence, resolve disputes, and provide legal representation in negotiations and litigation involving property matters.
Real estate lawyers are crucial in safeguarding your investment by ensuring compliance with local, state, and federal real estate laws, as well as protecting you from potential legal pitfalls related to property ownership and transactions.
When Should I Hire a Real Estate Lawyer?
Hiring a real estate lawyer is beneficial in various scenarios, including:
- Buying or selling property: When navigating complex real estate contracts, it’s advisable to have a lawyer review and ensure that the terms are favorable and legal.
- Commercial property transactions: For leasing, purchasing, or selling commercial properties, a lawyer can help manage the intricate legal aspects of such transactions.
- Zoning or land use issues: If you're planning to develop property or change its use, a real estate lawyer can guide you through zoning laws and land use regulations.
- Resolving property disputes: For boundary disputes, title issues, or disagreements over property rights, a lawyer can help mediate or litigate the matter.
- Foreclosures or evictions: If you're dealing with foreclosure or managing a tenant eviction, legal representation ensures that the process adheres to local laws and protects your interests.
- Title and deed issues: Lawyers can help clear title disputes, ensure the legitimacy of property deeds, and handle transfers of ownership.
What Does a Real Estate Lawyer Do?
A real estate lawyer provides a range of services to help with property transactions and disputes, including:
- Contract drafting and review: Ensuring that purchase agreements, leases, and other contracts are legally binding, fair, and protect your interests.
- Title search and clearance: Conducting a thorough title search to ensure that the property has no legal claims or liens that could affect ownership.
- Facilitate closing: Managing the closing process in real estate transactions, including reviewing final documents and ensuring that everything is in order before the transfer of ownership.
- Resolve disputes: Handling legal disputes related to property ownership, boundaries, zoning, or tenants.
- Assist in financing: Reviewing loan agreements and mortgage documents to ensure the terms are fair and legally sound.
- Zoning and land use advice: Guiding clients through the complexities of zoning laws and building regulations for property development or renovation projects.
How Are Real Estate Lawyers Paid?
Real estate lawyers typically charge for their services in the following ways:
- Flat fee: Many real estate transactions, such as reviewing a sales contract or assisting with a closing, are charged on a flat-fee basis.
- Hourly rates: If a lawyer is handling complex disputes or litigation, they may charge by the hour. Hourly rates can vary significantly based on the lawyer’s experience and location.
- Contingency fees: In rare cases, such as property disputes or claims for damages, a lawyer may work on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only get paid if you win or settle the case.
- Retainer: For ongoing legal support, some clients may pay a retainer, which is an upfront fee used as a deposit for future legal services.
It's important to clarify the fee structure with your attorney before hiring them to avoid any surprises.
How Much Does a Real Estate Lawyer Cost?
The cost of a real estate lawyer varies based on the complexity of the matter, the location of the property, and the lawyer’s experience. Key factors that affect pricing include:
- Type of transaction or issue: Simple tasks, like contract reviews, typically cost less than handling a complex property dispute or litigation.
- Experience and location: More experienced lawyers or those in high-demand areas, like urban centers, often charge higher rates.
- Billing structure: Lawyers may charge a flat fee for basic services like document review or hourly for more time-intensive work such as disputes or litigation.
Flat fees for straightforward services like closing assistance may range from $500 to $1,500.
Hourly rates can range from $150 to $400 or more, depending on the attorney’s experience and location.
Always discuss fees upfront to understand the overall cost of the legal service you're receiving.
Top Questions to Ask a Real Estate Lawyer
Before hiring a real estate lawyer, ask the following questions to ensure they are the right fit for your legal needs:
-
What experience do you have with real estate law?
Ensure the lawyer has experience in the type of real estate transaction or dispute you’re facing, whether residential, commercial, or development-related. -
What is your fee structure?
Ask how the lawyer charges for services - whether it's a flat fee, hourly rate, or retainer - so there are no surprises later on. -
How long will the process take?
Especially important for real estate transactions or disputes with deadlines, ask for a general estimate of how long the process will last. -
Have you handled cases similar to mine?
Experience with similar transactions or disputes can give you confidence that the lawyer knows how to handle your case. -
Will you handle my case personally, or will it be passed to another attorney?
Confirm who will be handling the bulk of your case work, especially in larger firms where junior lawyers may take on some responsibilities. -
Can you provide references?
Speaking with past clients can give you insight into the lawyer's experience and how they handle cases.
How to Check the Credibility of a Real Estate Lawyer
To ensure you’re hiring a reputable real estate lawyer, take these steps:
- Check with the state bar association: Verify that the lawyer is licensed and in good standing with no disciplinary actions on their record.
- Read online reviews and testimonials: Look for reviews on legal directories and platforms like Avvo or Martindale-Hubbell to see what past clients have said.
- Ask for references: A credible lawyer should have past clients willing to share their experiences.
- Review their track record and expertise: Look at the lawyer’s website or LinkedIn profile for information about their experience in real estate law and any relevant cases they’ve handled.
- Membership in professional organizations: Lawyers who are members of respected legal or real estate organizations, like the American Bar Association’s Real Property Division, often signal credibility and expertise.
What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?
To make your first meeting with a real estate lawyer productive, you should prepare the following materials:
- Relevant property documents: Bring purchase agreements, lease contracts, mortgage documents, zoning permits, or any other paperwork related to your case.
- A summary of the issue or transaction: Be ready to explain the situation, whether it's a property dispute, contract negotiation, or development issue.
- Questions about the legal process: Prepare a list of questions about how the lawyer will handle your case and what steps are involved.
- Financial documents or loan agreements: If the case involves financing or a mortgage, bring any related documents for the lawyer to review.
- Your goals and timeline: Be clear about what outcome you're hoping for, and if there are any deadlines that need to be considered, such as closing dates or legal filings.
By coming prepared, you can ensure that your consultation is efficient and informative, allowing you to assess whether the lawyer is the right fit for your real estate needs.
