Lawyers map
>937
experienced lawyers
Filter by
18 Apr, 2024 by K
0 stars if I could. Go elsewhere
Read more
23 Dec, 2022 by Michael a. mckay
Excellent work. Very pleased with the outcome!
Read more
19 Oct, 2022 by Charles reinmuth (chippy)
Paine Hamblen was recommended to me by Legacy Law Group. They returned my call, and I provided some details. They advised I would hear back from them, but I never did. We ended up going with a guy based in Seattle. He's okay, but our situation is ongoing. So I'll wait to recommend/review him.
Read more
20 Sep, 2023 by Darrin odell
My mother used Foster Law for her will. Unfortunately, she never went in to have it signed. She is now in assisted living and not only wants to sign it, but make some updates. I contacted Foster before coming into town (I live in SoCal), and was told they would squeeze us in on a Tuesday or Friday. When I got into town, I was then told the next available meeting was 3 weeks out. I explained that wouldn't work - could we do something with a mobile notary, any solutions that didn't require a trip into the office, etc. I was offered a day two days earlier than the first, which again, would definitely not work. I told them I'd pursue other solutions on my own. I was then left a passive aggressive voice mail from Dorothy Foster chiding me for my obvious lack of understanding of WA law. Do yourself a favor - use legal zoom, line up 2 witnesses and a notary and save yourself the frustration of using an attorney who has zero empathy and zero customer service. Do not support these folks.
Read more
10 Jun, 2022 by Elcin cetinkaya
26 Oct, 2019 by David miller
25 Oct, 2017 by Anonymous
Stay away from this shop unless you want to be gouged. Oftentimes it took three weeks to get email answered, files reviewed. Company could not even handle routine court filing on time. Performance falls below the standard you would expect from a supposedly boutique law firm. So not worth the money.
Read more
26 Jan, 2025 by Don haselwood
Just Amazing
Read more
18 Oct, 2024 by A p
No body help
Read more
26 May, 2024 by Peyton mannin
26 Jan, 2025 by Don haselwood
Just Amazing
Read more
18 Oct, 2024 by A p
No body help
Read more
26 May, 2024 by Peyton mannin
23 Jan, 2025 by Douglas adcock
Takes too long to settle an estate. The family may loose everything waiting years for a settlement. While my sister gets her money because it's hers from the same accident my dad died from I'm still waiting. Yet my Dad passed away October 29th of 2023 I'm still waiting for the settlement on my Dad's estate. It's unsettling how long it takes. I live in SSI and this money could really make a difference in my life but I must wait indefinitely until they decide to pay out. Meanwhile they have they're money "attorney" gets paid while you wait. Everyone gets their money but you must wait years for an insurance payment even though they have the money so thanks for nothing.
Read more
30 Aug, 2023 by Cherie mcalpine-foster
29 Jun, 2023 by Mary lou coyner
Michael Thorner is an extremely kind and respectful man! He has an incredible gift for explaining complex and complicated issues. He takes the time to explain all sides of an issue and the possible outcomes of different actions.
This morning's meeting with Michael was not at all what I was expecting. However, I came away feeling like I had hope, and excellent advice, in how I could handle my crisis. I now have a clear path ahead of me, and I am certain it will work out for everyone concerned.
Read more
17 Mar, 2015 by Sandeep sharma
My wife and I needed a fairly complex estate package (involving foreign countries). Ms Andrea Hardin was referred to us by one of my MSFT colleagues. She was able to go through all of the components of the estate plans for me and my family. She went and extra mile to explain things to us that were new and unknown (and there are many!) We are happy and comfortable knowing that our affairs are in order. When the opportunity came to purchase a new home, we called Ms Hardin again. She was as kind as the first time and very very patient with us. She went through every page of every document and found a lot of inconsistencies in the materials proposed by the selling party. We felt well protected and taken care of by such an accomplished attorney. Thank you, Ms Hardin! We will get back to you for the attorney support when the time comes to sell our house in the future. Thank you again!
Read more
01 Jan, 2014 by Anonymous
She appears to be a very intelligent attorney, but she insults almost everyone she interacts with. Rather than create a stress free environment during our transaction, we felt more stressed due to the confrontation she caused with the other attorney, and other parties involved. We were very disappointed in the transaction, and will no longer use her.
Read more
15 Jul, 2013 by Gretchen
We Will Not Return
Ms. Hardin is a competent attorney with a well-established practice; however, her professional demeanor (or rather the lack thereof) made us extremely uncomfortable in her office. The condescending attitude she exhibited towards her paralegal during our meeting was both astonishing and disappointing. When we left Ms. Hardin's office, my husband and I both agreed that we would not return based on her behavior. How someone treats their subordinates is an excellent gauge of character. There are many attorneys in the Puget Sound area who are fully competent in this area of law AND treat others with respect. It might well benefit Ms. Hardin if she remembered that fact. We will not return to Ms. Hardin's office nor will we recommend this attorney to fellow peers.
Read more
12 Mar, 2024 by Daria
Elena profited on our family’s tragedy. Avoid working with her at all cost. Don’t waste your money and precious time! Elena knew how I was eager to bring my lonely old mother to bring to the US, and used it to take more and more money from me on every occasion even when I paid for her “service” in advance. She did everything possible for the case to be delayed. She constantly made mistakes which delayed my mother’s case for 2-3 months each time after being reviewed by NVC. She blamed them for not accepting the documents, but once I started looking into the correspondence between Elena and NVC, everything was clear: NVC gave clear guidance (about affidavit of support, about format of the photos etc) and told what had to be done, and Elena ignored them. Once I took the case into my hands, and submitted all the documents on my own - the case was instantly approved. What was especially disgusting is her asking for more money for fixing her own mistakes. I was so desperate that I sent a request to the sanator, and Elena blamed me for screwing up the case. But it turned out the senator’s office never got my mailed documents. They confirmed it via phone. But it was a nice excuse for her to use against me, and block me everywhere so she took money for her “service” (around 2k + some additional sent to her personal Zelle account), and once I confronted her about bad quality of her work, she just blocked me everywhere. And she blocked me only after I refused to pay her more money for fixing what she screwed up. Also she misinformed me in very important thing: she told that I would be able to come with my mother to the interview as a petitioner, so there “would be no need in translator” which turned out not to be the case. So I have to look for and pay a translator. The most unprofessional and unethical person I’ve ever worked with in the US for over a decade.
Read more
27 Oct, 2015 by Denise
Eleana was the best! She helped me with some very serious tax issues. And we got positive results.
She was great at explaining things and very kind and easy to work with. I can't thank her enough!
She is an excellent Attorney. My father went to UW Law School and he would be very thankful for what she did for me.
Thank you so much Eleana!
Read more
15 Oct, 2015 by Yulia
Elena is a great lawyer. She helped me with my marriage-based immigration after my marriage fell apart. She was very reliable, easy to reach and very personable too! I highly recommend Elena if you need help with immigration.
Read more
08 Jan, 2020 by Anonymous
I hired Ms. Veliz in September of 2017 to handle my case involving IRS debt from my ex-husband, as well as debt from the marriage I was unaware of.
She came in confident stating how many cases she had one previously in the Innocent Spouse area. She did not guarentee we would win, but that she would fight for me.
I gave her every bit of detailed information ever requested immediately upon request.
I would not hear from her for days.
There were vacations and out of offices. All the while my future hung in the balance. I felt no sense of urgency on her part.
I ultimately lost my case. She found out the Thursday prior to Labor Day weekend of 2018. She did not inform me until an 5 days later.
When we discussed this, she replied she was too upset with the outcome to be able to discuss it.
My take is that she simply wanted to cut out for a long weekend early.
What further struck me was after losing my Innocent Spouse case, she tried selling me on appealing it. After months of anxiety and paying an attorney, I was exhausted and wanted it over. Once she knew there was no more money to be had from me as a client, she got off the phone as quickly as possible.
No empathy, no parting remarks. I felt like I gave my trust and money to the wrong person.
Looking back on her big elaborate office, it made sense. I do not believe she is out for justice for her clients, she is out to make money, pure and simple. Unfortunately for me, I did not do deep enough homework, or I would have never wasted my time or money on an attorney that is not fighting for my best interest.
Read more
19 May, 2017 by Anonymous
Sandra has helped me resolve my tax issue with the IRS. I never had an issue with the IRS before. I was quite anxious when I received notice from them. She used to work for the IRS and was able to explain how the whole process works. She offered a few suggestions to tackle my tax situation. I decided to go with plan A and was able to get my tax situation resolved after the 1st try.
She was great to work with and was able to put me at ease.
I cannot say enough good things about Sandra. Anyone with IRS related issues should definitely consider hiring her.
Read more
24 Feb, 2011 by Anonymous
After a 3 1/2 year on going audit and working with two seperate attorneys who did NOTHING to represent me, I was referred to Sandra. She took charge, got the ball moving, kept me informed and did an excellent job navigating my case out of court and back into a settlement with an appeals officer. I could not be happier with my results and the professional working relationship I developed with Sandra along with the way. The person who recommended her to me was my accountant and he stated that he had been referring this firm for over 20 years with great success. My outcome was better then I expected and I now tell my friends and family that hiring Sandra was one of the smartest investment I have ever made. She was fair in her billing and cautious of my budget and financial needs. I spent thousands of dollars on other attorney's and was so relieved when I fianally found Sandra.
Read more
18 Apr, 2024 by K
0 stars if I could. Go elsewhere
Read more
23 Dec, 2022 by Michael a. mckay
Excellent work. Very pleased with the outcome!
Read more
19 Oct, 2022 by Charles reinmuth (chippy)
Paine Hamblen was recommended to me by Legacy Law Group. They returned my call, and I provided some details. They advised I would hear back from them, but I never did. We ended up going with a guy based in Seattle. He's okay, but our situation is ongoing. So I'll wait to recommend/review him.
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
18 Oct, 2019 by Dee
I went and met Mr. Anderson for a free 30 min consultation regarding professional negligence, he had no problem spending quite a bit more time discussing the details 2+ hours he spoke with me. I left feeling appreciative and optimistic, he kept my paperwork to look over the holiday week, just to familiarize himself with my case.
Awsome rite? Wrong..... after 6 months of numerous emails and voice messages, I finally caught him by phone to make a follow up appt. He offered no explanation for the non-communication, and that appt he set never happend. Now its been another 6 months (over a year now total) Ive called and emailed repeatedly with no response. Last week I called from a private number and he answered ...scheduled a time for me to come meet him to get my documents. The morning before we were scheduled to meet I spoke with him again and he asked to reschedule, saying he was having breakfast with colleague of his who was interested about my case the next morning and wanted to have the paperwork to show him. Well .... I guess after so long of not hearing a word from him I shouldnt have agreed to reschedule, needless to say I didnt hear back from him and he surely hasnt responded to emails or calls. He seemed genuinely interested in my situation I really didnt expect this type of conduct- Im obviously mad...
Read more
01 Mar, 2019 by Francisco
The biggest issue for this guy is very unresponsive (never responded to your email, calls) during his representation for this one year. Somewhat careless, and forgetful.
Read more
14 Jul, 2017 by Anonymous
Jason did not give the bankruptcy court our new address and he did not give the court our change of income even when we gave him 21 days notice of our address and income change to our court.
Read more
26 Jan, 2022 by Anonymous
He didn’t do what promised. Completely failed me. I expected better results from his work.
Read more
17 Mar, 2015 by Sean
Todd has assisted our family in three separate family law cases and he is the first one we turn to in any legal matter! He is quick to respond to any concerns and very knowledgeable about the law. He is compassionate when dealing with clients. I highly recommend him.
Read more
21 May, 2014 by Anonymous
Absolute worst possible experience with this law firm. They sent a different lawyer to our court date and didn't tell us until he showed up. He had no knowledge on our case. Billing was ridiculous. Due to screwing our case up entirely, Todd himself told us there would be no cost for him to fix his mess up. Not only did the other side get what they wanted.. They were COMPLETELY in the wrong.. With complete confidence before our court date that we would win, the other attorney Daniel that works for him, was awful in court. He didn't use all the evidence that was given to him.. He managed to leave out the most important details.. I have literally met with the attorney twice! I hired him 8 months ago. We have to go through the paralegal for everything. The whole firm fails to take us serious. Telling us it would be a bad idea to go back to court, unless we paid another full retainer... In that case they could get the judge to take us serious, and be on our side. I am now moving on to a new attorney, and will NEVER even consider sending someone to buskirk and associates.
Read more
25 Apr, 2024 by Allen lowery
There the bést añd tóók my case with no money down ór àny payments uñtil we wiñ wiçh they hàve çontacted Dódge experts to testify and everything very prompt and get down to all the right facs there's no way can loose when the other gúys don't have the éxperts
Read more
15 Mar, 2024 by Andrew williams
27 Oct, 2023 by Lexi poborsky
20 Feb, 2023 by Anonymous
I came across Dan through a friend referral who only has rave reviews about his practice. Dan is a very conscientious, intelligent and thorough lawyer. His expertise shines through during consultation. I can tell he pays attention to detail and actually spend time in knowing his client and the case. Unlike other lawyers, you can definitely tell he is not about the money. He spent time researching my case and did not charge me an exorbitant amount! If you’re looking for an honest, hardworking attorney to get you the best resolution, you can’t go wrong with Dan. I have and will continue to recommend his practice whenever I have the opportunity!
Read more
09 Feb, 2021 by Anonymous
Rude and Unknowledgeable. I was appalled at how I was treated just during a consult. I feel as if I already new more about the laws of my case than he. Do not even bother to contact this person.
Read more
12 Jan, 2021 by Anonymous
Beware when dealing with Danny Gonzalez. He is very two-faced very slanderous and can’t run his own company. But will gladly take your money and make it disappear. He should be a magician not a lawyer!
Read more
18 Oct, 2023 by Chris nelson
David Seely failed to effectively intervene when a minor was signed into a Lake Washington school by a non-custodial parent.
The school district misspent taxpayer dollars on his employment.
Read more
14 Nov, 2017 by Carol hubbard
David Seeley has provided excellent service to me for several issues. I highly recommend David. He is fair, understanding, and gets results!
Carol Hubbard
Read more
27 Jun, 2024 by Jason cooley
I have been working with Lukins & Annis now for two years, and I must say that all the staff I have interacted with are truly professional. David Webster and his team helped me navigate the probate arena, while Charles Hausberg and Zaine M. Yzaguirre have been stellar in helping me with my litigation. Their expertise and advice is well above the price they charge, and I cannot recommend this law firm enough; you will not be disappointed.
Read more
18 Apr, 2024 by K
0 stars if I could. Go elsewhere
Read more
23 Dec, 2022 by Michael a. mckay
Excellent work. Very pleased with the outcome!
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
11 Jul, 2024 by Kristopher lichtanski
I have had an excellent experience with CCL and Ms. Choi in the matter of a complicated easement / title situation. The office staff was super responsive, appointments were scheduled quickly and in collaboration with my schedule/availability, and the meetings I had with Ms. Choi were focused, organized, and super productive. I felt that Ms. Choi was prepared for the meetings, understood what I was dealing with, and discussed with me multiple options and potential outcomes regarding this legal matter, which is going to end up in Court. I could not have asked for a better attorney for my situation (and I have consulted with others prior to CCL) and I very much look forward to my ongoing work with CCL and Ms. Choi. I recommend CCL and Ms. Choi wholeheartedly!
Read more
05 May, 2024 by Ricardo saenz
I arranged a meeting with her to discuss immigration matters and seek professional validation of the process I had completed on my own. Unfortunately, during our reunion, she seemed more focused on protecting herself than genuinely assisting me. However, when I attended my USCIS appointment today, everything was in order, and the concerns she raised did not materialize. It was a stressful experience unnecessarily.
Read more
26 Apr, 2024 by Larry hu
I did not have a good experience with the law firm. My main issues is that Boyoon Choi would repeatedly interrupt me and cut me off before I could finish speaking and there were some mannerisms like scoffing (in a subtle but noticeable way) that came off as pretty condescending and I received a general negative feeling from the tone of voice she used with me. She was also 6 minutes late to our Zoom meeting but cut our 30 minute meeting short nonetheless so we really only had 24 minutes together. I'm sure she would probably bill the time for 30 minutes to my MetLife benefits and not the 24 minutes that I actually got. The way I see it, if a client does not have the correct understanding then inform them in a respectful way. Trying to be subtle with mannerisms like quietly scoffing or responding with a negative tone, one that felt a bit indignant towards me feels less like you're working with someone that's trying to advocate for you and more like you're talking to someone that's trying to take out whatever stress she may be having towards you. It seems that no wonder her staff seems to sound a bit on edge over the phone as I can imagine what it can be like to be subjected to that over time.
She also knew that my home is in Snohomish County but told me that she can't help with the eviction process in that area, but took my money through my MetLife benefit anyway. That's pretty messed up.
Lastly, I also felt it was problematic to be told that she did not know the RCW that covered why a 90 day notice to vacate due to sale is not enforceable unless it is specifically mentioned in the lease agreement. When I requested clarification for her to specify how is this the case, she could only tell me it's part of the general landlord tenant rights that a lease agreement has to specify that an early termination can take place due to sale and that this language would not be specifically mentioned due to it being covered under the general umbrella of tenant rights. However, RCW 59.18.650 clearly states it's permissible for a landlord to end a lease agreement early with cause for the purpose of selling a home.
Boyoon Choi should really be careful with giving advice that she clearly does not know the basis for. It is concerning when you ask for the RCW that she does not know it, and scoffs at you while mentioning it's part of the general rights for a tenant.
Anyways, here is what I was told by another source about the permissibility of ending a lease early to sell the home:
In Washington State, typically, if a landlord provides a 90-day notice to vacate for the purpose of selling the property, this is generally considered lawful. In Washington State, the enforceability of a 90-day notice to vacate due to the sale of a property typically does not require a specific clause in the lease agreement stating that sale of the home entails the tenant moving out. The standard process allows landlords to issue such a notice as part of the rights to dispose of their property, assuming other legal and procedural requirements are met (e.g., proper notice period and service).
Lastly, she was also incorrect about my MetLife legal benefit. She said I don't have benefits for litigation as part of my benefit but in my MetLife portal it clearly states: "This service covers the Participant as a landlord for matters involving leases, security deposits and disputes with a residential tenant. The service includes attorney services for the eviction of a tenant up to and including trial."
Read more
05 Feb, 2025 by Selina sweet
Senator Maria Cantwell voted for bombs, bullets, drones and billions be sent to the colonial extremists Netanyahu and his cohort to slaughter the Palestinians in Gaza - every time that legislation came up for a vote. Never once did she hold a Town Hall in Seattle to garner the predominant voice of her constituency. She ought to be retired.
Read more
04 Feb, 2025 by Tammy mueller
04 Feb, 2025 by Matt lamay
25 Jul, 2024 by Andria bieber designs
Nick Cody helped me and was extremely knowledgeable and excellent with guidance. If you are looking for a great attorney you will be glad you called Nick. He was caring, compassionate and insightful. overall excellent experience.
Read more
16 Jul, 2024 by Marco fanato
Reading all reviews here I decided not to hire any attorneys from this 'law firm'. Besides, I called and left a message for one of their attorneys who never returned my call. I am letting go of my case because I don't want to lose more money than I have already lost by paying to a fraudulent builder/contractor.
Read more
27 Aug, 2023 by James tasoulas
Love it!!!
Read more
25 Jul, 2024 by Andria bieber designs
Nick Cody helped me and was extremely knowledgeable and excellent with guidance. If you are looking for a great attorney you will be glad you called Nick. He was caring, compassionate and insightful. overall excellent experience.
Read more
16 Jul, 2024 by Marco fanato
Reading all reviews here I decided not to hire any attorneys from this 'law firm'. Besides, I called and left a message for one of their attorneys who never returned my call. I am letting go of my case because I don't want to lose more money than I have already lost by paying to a fraudulent builder/contractor.
Read more
27 Aug, 2023 by James tasoulas
Love it!!!
Read more
21 Oct, 2013 by Anonymous
I'm not sure where other reviews are coming from, but Bruce Hondle handled my legal matters with the utmost professionalism, knowledge, foresight, and suggested things my past attorney's never thought of, he is on top of his game, extremely knowledgeable and was upfront with everything the entire step-of-the way. Not only is Bruce Hondle a superb attorney but also a darn great CPA with up-to-date tax-law knowledge. His attention to detail is second-to-none and sets him apart from the rest, extremely important when drafting documents and financial planning. I have finally found an attorney with whom I truly trust.
Read more
16 Dec, 2012 by Anonymous
I agree with the other two clients who also gave him poor ratings, and stated.
(Mr. Hondle takes advantage of people. For example: he will charge you for a 10
second response to a phone message but use his full bilabial rate.) (And
instead of speaking over the phone, he would rather send an itemized letter
stating all of the things you owe him money for, and then not return your calls if
you want to question him.) These statements above are true as I also have
experienced them with Mr. Hondle as are estate attorney. Once was more than
enough. About the only time Mr. Hondle would return my calls was when
another one of high-priced exorbitant bills were due. Mr. Hondle conducted his
business with us in a completely unprofessional manner, and charged us a small
fortune! Mr. Hondle does not even have his own office, as he works out of his
house.
Read more
13 Sep, 2011 by Anonymous
Mr Hondle handled a need I had with my residential dwelling efficiently and quickly. He was easy to communicate with, responded to my needs with understanding, and completed the task in a dutiful manner. I could not be more pleased with his performance.
Read more
14 Nov, 2020 by Anonymous
I had very bad experience with Nancy Gass and would not recommend her to anyone.
Read more
19 Feb, 2016 by Anonymous
Nancy helps people as an interest, just happens for the right reason that she is an expert in Law. She is good with people all ages and all cultures. Great to have her in our town because we can always count on her.
Read more
03 Nov, 2024 by Robin mullins
In April 2024 he hired me to file documents on his behalf in the local Whatcom County Superior Court. A measly $91.64. It is now November 2024 and he hasn't paid me and he won't communicate with me. If you supply services to lawyers (process serving, legal messenger, and the like) do not work for this guy.
Read more
26 May, 2012 by Anonymous
Thanks Paul for your great work!, and my consequent success!
Read more
23 Sep, 2024 by Jennifer
You expect a hired attorney to provide appropriate and timely legal advice, which is part of professionalism. Having a number of businesses, I would avoid using Sean Ryan Kennedy for any legal advice or any guidance on the ROBS structure. Do not use. I am having to file bar complaints, and potentially a lawsuit against him.
Read more
24 May, 2013 by Kira
I had a tax problem. An embarrassing, mostly-of-my-own-making tax problem. I'd tried Ronnie Deutch from the TeeVee (not great). I'd tried a place that went out of business the year after I used their not-so-awesome services.
Then I got ANOTHER letter from the IRS, and, not being an accountant or a lawyer or particularly cogent when it comes to business, I surfed the web and found someone who was (a) local-ish and who (b) didn't have any bad reviews. And that person was Sean Kennedy, of Tollefsen Law.
I did see a good review of the actual Mr. Tollefsen... so I didn't fly completely blind. But in this instance I just sort of lucked out, and I am writing this review so others who are similarly searching have some data on which to base their choice.
To put it simply - Sean got my stupid rear end out of some serious trouble with the IRS, and he did it quickly, efficiently, aggressively, and for a very reasonable price.
He is RESPONSIVE. I got immediate relies to emails. I got emails at 6:30am. I never had to wait. I never had to remind. He just leapt at it and did it, fast.
He is KNOWLEDGEABLE. I went to meet him to review the case, and he quickly laid out all the parameters and options in a way that I understood completely. He didn't obfuscate or over-sell. He was accurate and on point.
He has a dry sense of humor. And yes, I know... this is both subjective and not really to the point. Except that it IS good to know if an attorney is personable and "gets it." And Sean does. I'm a fairly flamboyant personality and have a quirky presentation, and Sean dealt. He was not just pleasant and professional, but he had that twinkle in his eye that let me know, "I am dealing with a human, here. He's a mensch." Mark my words, when you are up to your eyeballs in scary IRS stuff, that quality is like gold.
So I would totally recommend Sean if you have a tax problem, need help, want someone who gets back to you and explains things so you understand them, and doesn't make you feel like an idiot. He's aces in my book, and I would retain him again if anything else ever came up.
Two brief notes:
1) I said "local-ish." His office is in Lynnwood, not Seattle. I don't have a driver's license, so I had to take the bus. I was expecting him to be in downtown Seattle, but the bus ride is a doddle, and quick, so no points off.
2) His paralegal, Belinda, is a delight. She's quick and efficient and friendly AND puts you right at ease when you arrive. Excellent customer service. Kudos.
Read more
Browse lawyers
Cities in Washington - Find a Lawyer Near Me
-
Seattle
-
Spokane
-
Tacoma
-
Bellevue
-
Olympia
-
Vancouver
-
Everett
-
Redmond
-
Bellingham
-
Yakima
-
Kirkland
-
Kent
-
Renton
-
Kennewick
-
Issaquah
-
Mercer Island
-
Wenatchee
-
Lynnwood
-
Edmonds
-
Gig Harbor
-
Port Orchard
-
Federal Way
-
Bainbridge Island
-
Bothell
-
Puyallup
-
Mount Vernon
-
Tumwater
-
Richland
-
Spokane Valley
-
Tukwila
-
Bremerton
-
University Place
-
Walla Walla
-
Shoreline
-
Auburn
-
Longview
-
Lacey
-
Sammamish
-
Woodinville
-
Port Angeles
-
Silverdale
-
Lakewood
-
Snohomish
-
Port Townsend
-
Burien
-
Poulsbo
-
Mill Creek
-
Camas
-
Ellensburg
-
Moses Lake
-
Pullman
-
Shelton
-
Chehalis
-
Pasco
-
Marysville
-
Mountlake Terrace
-
Liberty Lake
-
Fircrest
-
Montesano
-
Oak Harbor
-
Centralia
-
Newcastle
-
Anacortes
-
Ephrata
-
North Bend
-
Des Moines
-
Lake Forest Park
-
Maple Valley
-
Mukilteo
-
Aberdeen
-
Arlington
-
Okanogan
-
Kenmore
-
Seatac
-
Vashon
-
Sequim
-
Colville
-
Coupeville
-
Friday Harbor
-
Sumner
-
Burlington
-
Blaine
-
Kingston
-
Bonney Lake
-
Normandy Park
-
East Wenatchee
-
Enumclaw
-
Kelso
Browse lawyers
Practice Areas in Washington
-
Business
-
Real Estate
-
Litigation
-
Criminal Defense
-
Government
-
Personal Injury
-
Estate Planning
-
Family Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Civil Rights
-
Appeals
-
Tax
-
Consumer Protection
-
Insurance
-
Immigration
-
Probate
-
Child Support
-
Elder Law
-
Car Accident
-
Juvenile Law
-
Workers Compensation
-
Child Custody
-
Medical Malpractice
-
Domestic Violence
-
Wrongful Death
-
Lawsuit / Dispute
-
Social Security & Disability
-
Mediation
-
Trusts
-
Debt Collection
-
Entertainment
-
Bankruptcy
-
Class Action
-
Foreclosure
-
Adoption
-
Discrimination
-
Financial Markets And Services
-
Wrongful Termination
-
Divorce
-
Sex Crime
-
Sexual Harassment
-
Copyright Application
-
Federal Crime
-
Debt Settlement
-
Employment / Labor
-
Construction
-
DUI / DWI
-
Cannabis Law
-
Drug Crime
-
Landlord & Tenant
-
Credit Repair
-
Admiralty / Maritime
-
Environmental Law
-
Life Insurance
-
Contracts
-
Education Law
-
Constitutional Law
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers
What a Tax Lawyer Can Do for You
A tax lawyer specializes in the complex area of tax law, offering legal advice and representation on matters related to tax compliance, disputes with tax authorities, and tax planning. Tax lawyers help individuals, businesses, and organizations navigate the intricacies of federal, state, and local tax laws. They ensure that clients are compliant with tax regulations, minimize tax liabilities, and represent them in audits, appeals, or disputes with tax authorities such as the IRS.
Whether you need assistance with personal taxes, corporate tax strategy, or resolving an audit, a tax lawyer can protect your rights and help you manage your financial responsibilities.
When Should I Hire a Tax Lawyer?
Hiring a tax lawyer is advisable in several situations where tax issues are complicated, disputes arise, or legal strategies are necessary to manage tax liability. Common reasons to hire a tax lawyer include:
- Tax audits or disputes with the IRS: If you are facing an audit or have received a notice of deficiency from the IRS, a tax lawyer can represent you and defend your rights during the process.
- Tax debt relief: If you owe back taxes or face significant tax liabilities, a tax lawyer can help negotiate a payment plan, settlement, or Offer in Compromise with the IRS.
- Tax planning for businesses or individuals: A tax lawyer can advise on strategies to minimize tax liabilities through legal deductions, credits, and other tax-saving mechanisms.
- International tax issues: If you have foreign assets or income, a tax lawyer can help you comply with international tax laws, such as the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) or Foreign Bank Account Reporting (FBAR) requirements.
- Tax fraud or evasion accusations: If you're being investigated or charged with tax fraud or evasion, a tax lawyer can provide a defense and negotiate with the authorities to minimize penalties.
- Corporate tax law compliance: Businesses, especially large corporations, benefit from the expertise of a tax lawyer who can handle complex issues such as mergers and acquisitions, employee benefits, and international tax planning.
- Estate and gift tax planning: A tax lawyer can help you minimize estate taxes and ensure your assets are passed on efficiently through trusts, wills, and other tax-efficient structures.
Hiring a tax lawyer early can prevent costly mistakes and ensure you are fully compliant with all applicable tax laws.
What Does a Tax Lawyer Do?
A tax lawyer provides a wide range of services to assist clients with tax compliance, tax planning, and legal disputes. Their key responsibilities include:
- Tax planning and advisory: Helping individuals and businesses plan their tax strategies to reduce liability, avoid penalties, and maximize deductions and credits.
- Representing clients in tax disputes: Defending clients in disputes with the IRS or state tax authorities, including audits, appeals, and collections actions.
- Filing Offers in Compromise: Negotiating settlements with the IRS for clients who owe more than they can afford to pay.
- Handling tax litigation: Representing clients in tax court or other legal proceedings if a tax dispute escalates beyond the administrative level.
- Estate and gift tax planning: Advising clients on how to structure their estate to minimize estate and gift taxes, including creating trusts, family partnerships, or charitable giving plans.
- Assisting with tax fraud investigations: Defending clients accused of tax fraud, evasion, or criminal tax offenses.
- International tax compliance: Advising clients with offshore assets on U.S. tax compliance and reporting requirements, including FATCA and FBAR.
How Are Tax Lawyers Paid?
Tax lawyers typically charge for their services in various ways, depending on the complexity of the work involved and the nature of the legal assistance required. Common payment structures include:
- Hourly rate: Many tax lawyers charge by the hour, especially for complex cases or ongoing legal work such as audit defense, tax litigation, or corporate tax planning. Hourly rates can range from $200 to $600 or more, depending on the lawyer's experience and location.
- Flat fee: For specific tasks, such as preparing a legal document, filing an Offer in Compromise, or handling a routine audit, some lawyers charge a flat fee.
- Retainer: For businesses or individuals with ongoing tax needs, a lawyer may require a retainer, which is an upfront payment used to secure the lawyer’s services and billed against as work is completed.
- Contingency fee: In rare cases, particularly when negotiating settlements or resolving tax debts, a lawyer may charge a contingency fee based on the outcome of the case. This means they only get paid if they succeed in reducing your tax liability.
Always ask about the fee structure during the initial consultation to avoid surprises and ensure you understand how the lawyer will charge for their services.
How Much Does a Tax Lawyer Cost?
The cost of hiring a tax lawyer depends on the complexity of the case, the lawyer’s experience, and the specific services required. Here are some general cost estimates:
- Simple tax issues: For straightforward cases such as filing an Offer in Compromise or handling a routine audit, fees may range from $2,000 to $7,500.
- Complex tax disputes: For more complicated cases, such as defending against tax fraud accusations, handling a significant IRS audit, or resolving international tax issues, costs can range from $10,000 to $50,000 or more, depending on the time and effort involved.
- Hourly rates: Tax lawyers typically charge between $200 and $600 per hour, with higher rates for more experienced attorneys or cases involving high-stakes outcomes.
- Flat fees: For specific services, such as tax planning for an estate or preparing a legal document, a flat fee may range from $1,000 to $10,000, depending on the complexity of the task.
Always get a detailed estimate of fees during your consultation so you can plan your budget accordingly.
Top Questions to Ask a Tax Lawyer
Before hiring a tax lawyer, it’s important to ask the right questions to ensure they are the best fit for your situation. Key questions to ask include:
-
What experience do you have with tax law?
Ensure the lawyer has specific experience handling cases or issues similar to yours, whether it’s IRS disputes, corporate tax planning, or estate taxes. -
How do you charge for your services?
Clarify the lawyer’s fee structure - whether it’s hourly, flat fee, or retainer - and ask for an estimate of the total cost of your case. -
What are the potential outcomes of my case?
Ask the lawyer to provide an honest assessment of your situation and the possible outcomes, such as tax reductions, settlements, or litigation results. -
Have you handled cases like mine before?
Find out if the lawyer has experience with issues similar to yours, such as international tax compliance, criminal tax defense, or complex estate planning. -
What is the timeline for my case?
Ask how long it will take to resolve your tax issue or dispute, as some tax matters can take months or years to fully settle. -
Will you handle my case personally?
In larger firms, junior attorneys or paralegals may do much of the work. Clarify who will be handling your case day-to-day.
How to Check the Credibility of a Tax Lawyer
To ensure you are hiring a reputable tax lawyer, take the following steps to verify their credentials and experience:
- Check their bar status: Verify with your state bar association that the lawyer is licensed and in good standing, with no history of disciplinary actions.
- Look for specific tax law expertise: Review the lawyer’s website or professional profile to ensure they specialize in tax law and have handled cases like yours.
- Read client reviews and testimonials: Look for client reviews on platforms like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, or Google to see what previous clients have said about the lawyer’s expertise and service.
- Ask for references: A credible tax lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients who can vouch for their ability to handle complex tax matters.
- Look for professional affiliations: Membership in organizations like the American Bar Association’s Section of Taxation or the National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP) can indicate that the lawyer stays current with tax law developments.
What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?
To get the most out of your first meeting with a tax lawyer, it’s essential to come prepared with all relevant documents and information. Here’s what you should bring:
- Tax returns and records: Bring copies of recent tax returns, especially those related to the issue you're facing.
- IRS correspondence: If you’ve received notices from the IRS or state tax authorities, bring all relevant documentation.
- Financial records: Bring records of income, expenses, assets, and any other relevant financial documents that the lawyer may need to understand your tax situation.
- List of questions: Prepare a list of questions to ask the lawyer about your case, the legal process, and the potential outcomes.
- Timeline of events: Provide a clear timeline of any interactions with the IRS or tax authorities, including audits, notices, or payment demands.
By being well-prepared, you can ensure a productive consultation and help the lawyer assess your situation effectively, providing you with the best legal advice moving forward.
