Filter by

star star star star star
19 May, 2017 by Anonymous
I wish I had read the reviews on AVVO before working with him. I concur with the previous review - Overcharges and Underdelivers. Takes advantage of clients. Charges you for Secretarial tasks at attorney rates. Never once stepped foot in the court system for me. Misguided me on case strategy. Could not produce the timesheets he was to use when billing me? Does not represent the practice of law in good faith. Poor example! Horrific experience!
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
21 Feb, 2013 by Anonymous
He estimated it would cost a maximum $25K of his time to get a corrupt trustee removed from his position. He ran up a bill of about $50K. He accomplished nothing. We had informed him early in engaging him that our financial resources for pursuing our interests were very limited, yet he didn't even alert us to the fact that he was running up was way exceeding what he had estimated and give us the option of backing out before the bill got too high. Of course no lawyer can guaranty results in an adversarial situation, but he and/or his staff dropped the ball in at least these specific ways. ## He was impolite in responding to client emails, having been heard in the background to a call I was having to his staff making denigrating comments about me, the client, and complaining that I was making an inquiry. ## He filed a critical court response pleading just _barely_ short (hours short) of the absolute deadline for the judge's staff to receive it. As a result there is reason to believe that the judge did not really read it and as a result what should have been a slam dunk judgment in my favor it appears the judge was uninformed of the issues. And in court, when it became clear the judge had not really read our arguments McCullough did not verbally attempt to correct the judge's misunderstanding. ## When the party we were opposing made to the judge an out rightly false statement about an action he had taken, even though McCullough had in his papers documentary proof that this was false he said nothing and produced no counter evidence. It is extremely disappointing to do all the hours of background research and provide one's lawyer with the ammunition he needs in a hearing, have him standing there earning $400+ per hour and then have him stand there like a dummy and say nothing while events unfold against your interests. I could likely have represented myself more effectively in that court than he did. ## Mr. McCullough's billing policies are draconian and unreasonable. Specifically: I would send and email with information he requested. I would be billed a minimal period of time (about $100) for him sending me that one line email. When I supplied via email the information he requested I would again be bill that minimal charge when he received that email from me. It is important to understand the information he requested was already available in papers I had supplied earlier, and essentially I was being asked to catch the ball for him not finding the info he already had AND being double charged for his or his staff's failure to do their own clerical work and filing properly. # He also made a bad judgment call by counseling us to not make a reasonable/palatable settlement offer to the other party involved. Any lawyer can make a bad judgment call, but when he does it should be duly noted. Mr. McCullough is not unknowledgeable of estate law. And he or his staff did clearly put in substantual time on the case. That was not the problem. He just didn't seem motivated or interested enough or alert enough to do what he needed to do to represent me well, and interms of cost/benefit ratio I could not recommend him as a good bet.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
28 Feb, 2024 by Anonymous
The review submitted by "Anonymous" is accurate, although 10 years old. I am not very good at what I do because I suffer from treatment resistant clinical depression. I am, however, very inexpensive.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
22 Oct, 2013 by Anonymous
This Lawyer/tax preparer is not responsive and doesn't do what he says he is going to do. I would recommend using someone that can be reached and does what he is supposed to do and when he is supposed to do it. He should not be practicing law or doing taxes for people. He is not professional at all.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
18 May, 2017 by Anonymous
Mr. Yacoubian was hired to represent me in a divorce. I found him in the Department Newsletter advertisement. Upon meeting him, he misleads me by saying how he knows how to help Officers since he's a retired Lieutenant. However, I believe he helped himself by increasingly adding charges that were not verifiable and excessive. Whenever I asked him a question he would always "get back" to me but really doesn't answer the question. He failed to get me custody time as I hired him for. Also, I was forced to fire him after not getting much done except making the situation worse. My new attorney even complained to me about Mr. Yacoubian calling him several times when he was no longer part of my case wasting his time. I had a horrible experience with Mr. Yacoubian and filed a complaint with the California State Bar. Be careful and question all of his charges.
Read more Avvo
star star star star star
13 Nov, 2016 by Anonymous
Our experience working with Mr. Yacoubian was a nightmare. We hired him to represent us in a civil case and we were forced to fire him after only 4 weeks. Mr. Yacoubian was very difficult to work with due to his poor interpersonal skills. Specially, we found him to be confrontational, argumentative and listening to us was not something he was capable of doing. Other attorneys on our case also expressed their concerns with his legal knowledge and their difficulty in interacting with him. This resulted in one attorney refusing to have any further direct contact with him. We believe Mr. Yacoubian’s billing practices are unethical and excessive. We were issued a final statement and refund from Mr. Yacoubian. Only to later receive an additional statement covering the same time period where the times and charges were entirely different from his original statement. Mr. Yacoubian also had confidential conversations with our new attorney after he was removed from our case by the judge, and against our stated wishes. His behavior led to us filing a complaint with the California State Bar. We do not recommend Mr. Yacoubian.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
10 Oct, 2019 by Ann
Hi, I hired as immigration attorny while I was working for a company in Pasadena, forgot to submit financial statement until a reference letter was sent to her, I paid her extra $1000, but never get it proved or sent me a copy. She pissed me and my family off entirely till this day, I've suffered so much for her representation and lost everything, she didn't even give me a copy of her filing or the records after! We are new in this country, trusted her, but she's a irresponsibile, poorly experienced, kept asking for pay and not good at filing it properly which result in me lost everything in my life and my son couldn't pursue higher education. Ann
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
06 Feb, 2018 by Dr. lillian glass
I hired VIncent Chieffo as my attorney for close to a year. He charged me over $100,000 and then informed me I didn't have a copyright infringement case against a publishing company where their author did word for word copying of my best selling book. He also strongly insisted I drop all claims against the publisher and insisted I sign an agreement to that regard. After hiring another lawyer, it turned out I not only had a case, but my new lawyer WON my case in US FEDERAL COURT against the author since I was prohibited to sue the publishing company because of Mr. Chieffo's poor legal counsel that I sign the agreement in their favor. Mr. Chieffo also let me know that he became good friends with the publishing company's attorney and they agreed to meet with one another socially whenever he was in NY, thereby confirming to me that he most likely had the oppositions legal interests over mine. I will also add that Mr. Cheffo spend a great deal of time talking about his personal life with me discussing his daughter's upcoming wedding, his wife, and his numerous trips to Morocco for which time I was charged that had nothing to do with me or my case. He also charged me for inviting me as a guest to a charity function honoring women journalists. My experience with Mr. Chieffo was extremely negative and i would never refer this attorney to anyone. It was my experience that he did not have my best interest at heart or represent me well and favored the opposition and charged and exorbitant fee only to tell me after he received six figures close a year later that I had no case which was unprofessional in my view and also telling me I had no case when I did and won my case in US Federal Court( but for a limited fee) His is poor legal advice resulted in my not being able to sue the publisher even though they, as well as the author were in the wrong. I would NEVER recommend this attorney to anyone.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
28 Sep, 2023 by Anonymous
Highly not recommended, at least 10,000$ retainer and of course it’s gone before we even start the case - Hourly rate 500$ !!!!! - Very very bad communication that lead to waste a lot of money , unnecessary long calls with no outcomes -I had a minor case with CA BOP , of course he have to make it sound huge to make as much money as possible , he promised with high expectation and end up with the worst -After my case was closed - His plan was to force me to accept an agreement that I’d never expected , after closing all other doors for negotiations -After my case was close I found out later on a lot of misinformation and false statements were provided to the general attorney including my statement status and family relationship with previous employer ( owner and pic ) that led to worsen the case -Way over charges, I tried to hired other attorneys but most of them were represent the opponent party and there were conflict of interest
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
11 Jan, 2013 by John
THE RED FLAG ON THIS LAWYER IS THERE TO ALERT YOU TO HER CHARACTER. BELIEVE ME, I KNOW, AS IT WAS MY COMPLAINT THAT BROUGHT THE STATE BAR TO PUNISH HER. SHE ALSO HAS GONE UNDERGROUND MORE THAN ONCE TO AVOID COLLECTIONS WHICH INCLUDE A SMALL CLAIMS ISSUE IN WHICH SHE SIGNED AN AGREEMENT TO PAY ME THE JUDGEMENT WITH MONTHLY PAYMENTS AND QUICKLY STOPPED PAYING AND WENT UNDERGROUND.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
29 Sep, 2015 by Anonymous
Daniel didn't know anything when it came down to my case and the laws that applied.I was the one doing all the research and work. Aren't lawyers supposed to know the law? Well this one hadn't the slightest clue. The work he put in was nothing more than emails and emails and maybe more emails. back and forth between him and my new landlords lawyer. My case wasn't even with my new landlord. I hired him to sue my old landlord for harassment. So when i found out he was emailing the new landlords lawyer asking for the relocating money in escrow, which he played no part with me getting, in order to keep 30 percent of it before handing me the rest.I felt completely betrayed and when i asked him about it, he quit. So, obviously Daniel isn't too concerned with practicing law in an ethical kind of way. If you choose him to represent you, all i can say is watch your back.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
19 Aug, 2018 by Anonymous
Based upon my experiences, I would strongly advise any and all persons seeking legitimate and competent representation to stir clear away from Mr. David Grant Geffen. I discovered his conduct to be very unprofessional as Davids' mannerism was very rude, condescending and argumentative. Mr. David Grant Geffen was a very negative person and who constantly challenge and demeaned me for disagreeing with his assessment. There are several excellent attorneys who believe in adhering to the golden rule, "treat others the way you wanted to be treated". However, based upon my experiences, Mr. David Grant Geffern does not hold up to this basic principle and tried to discourage me from pursuing my matter because he wasn't capable of handling it. As a person who was seeking representation the last thing I needed was to endure the unprofessionalism and condescending treatment of Mr. David Grant Geffern! Be forewarned!
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
15 Apr, 2024 by Anonymous
Incompetent and rude. We were looking forward to get a consultation referred by a colleague, however, we regret it. We cannot comprehend why someone like him with such an unprofessional mannerism can be in business. Avoid.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
20 Nov, 2023 by Anonymous
Retaining Scott F. Pomerantz to represent me was the worst decision I’ve ever made. Before retaining Pomerantz do your research! If I had researched Scott Pomerantz I would never have allowed him anywhere near my case. The more research I did, the more I discovered both in terms of his alleged outrageous misconduct & his lack of jury trial success. How Pomerantz even has a license to practice law is beyond me, especially after what he did to an 8-month pregnant doctor in the middle of her deposition. Before retaining him ask: “How many jury trials have you won?” & “How much money did you win? & “What’s your largest verdict?” I was shocked to learn how he had had almost no jury trials & had won such a negligible amount of money. He didn’t even carry malpractice insurance so I couldn’t even submit a claim for his alleged malpractice! I researched Pomerantz’s record as an attorney and learned Pomerantz was, in my opinion, an unsuccessful attorney where many of his cases were his own personal cases, many of which were suing his own clients and he engaged in conduct documented in court records I found morally repugnant. In LA case # SC119009 Court records include 2 Declarations, one by attorney Shauna Frasier the other by an 8-month pregnant Dr. Heather Oxford where they describe how Pomerantz started screaming profanities at Dr. Oxford in the midst of her deposition & how he grabbed the table & thrust it into Dr. Oxford’s pregnant belly! She states in her Declaration, “I could feel the force of the table press against my belly” & how “the videographer said ‘he is crazy’” & “I was very scared & stressed out…I could feel the baby acting differently due to my stress….I cannot go forward with another tense & terrifying experience such as this prior to the birth of my baby.” Fraser declared “I am very fearful & upset over what occurred” & that she “genuinely believed that Mr. Pomerantz was going to come across the table towards Dr. Oxford.” The Declarations outline their terrifying ordeal with Pomerantz. I discovered court records involving a psychiatrist, Dr. Carlotta Freeman, the 1st African American President of LA County Medical Assoc. She filed for an Order to Stop Harassment against Pomerantz, Case SS017047. She too describes a terrifying ordeal & states “I thought he was going to assault me…his rage shook me & I trembled with fear for my life. I called the LAPD.” Dr. Freeman indicates she believed Pomerantz vandalized her car. Given the Declarations of an attorney & 2 doctors it’s unfathomable how the California State Bar has failed to take action against Pomerantz. Court records show Pomerantz sued his landlord Sandy Berens over a dispute concerning his security deposit. Berens kept ~$1300 claiming Pomerantz damaged her property. Beren’s Trial Brief in case 09C01807 states she didn’t deduct the full amount of the damages “due to his intimidation.” She states she was afraid of Pomerantz & in court documents states he was “abusing his position as an officer of the court to try & extort money from his former landlord.” All of this is consistent with what I experienced with Pomerantz in my case. He was abusive & even threatened to kill me! In my opinion he ruined my case costing me a substantial sum of money. When I refused his demand for payment that I believe was totally unreasonable he sued me. He appeared in my case for three weeks then spent six years suing me over a relatively small sum of money. Apparently he didn’t have more productive things to do with his time. Pomerantz’s client Sandra Embrey sued him for fraud in Orange County case #30-2015-00791635, alleging he fraudulently induced her to sign his Fee Agreement which is what happened in my case as well! When my settlement check came from which I have yet to receive a penny Pomerantz emailed me stating he needed the funds from my check to pay his rent! Do your homework. I wish I had & avoided the nightmare of having Pomerantz as my attorney
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
29 Jun, 2018 by Anonymous
I tried to have Gafni hear my case out and he kept pushing me to back. Every other lawyer was willing to take my case afterward yet Gafni seemed to think I wasn’t prepared to show evidence and told me he’d refer me for something in his specialty list. Don’t waste your time with the guy as the rest of googles results show you, he won’t get you very far.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
26 Oct, 2011 by Anonymous
Failed to completely understand my case, and proceeded unsuccessfully by not conducting a through investigation which would have resulted in a favorable ruling. He lacked the proper knowledge of a case where he should have made himself completely familiar with before proceeding. It's a no brainer! Perhaps his workload prohibits him the time getting to discover all the facts beneficial to his client(s).
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
01 May, 2013 by Clare
Got no help from Devermont & Devermont for my disability case. The office staff was extremely rude and abrupt with me if I called with a question. I never once got to speak to the lawyer, only the extremely rude woman who answered the phone. I never received an update on my case and was made to feel bad if I wanted information. I do not recommend this firm. Very unprofessional.
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

Top Questions to Ask a Lawyer

When meeting with a lawyer for the first time, it's important to ask the right questions to understand their expertise and determine if they're the right fit for your legal needs. Here are some top questions to consider:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. What potential outcomes can I expect from my case?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  4. What is your approach to handling cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. Who will be working on my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the likely timeline for resolving my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What are the strengths and weaknesses of my case?
    Understanding potential challenges helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to solve my legal problem?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  1. Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing.
  2. Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case.
  3. Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association.
  4. Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, or Google to gauge client satisfaction.
  5. Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field.
  6. Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation.
  7. Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  8. Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  1. Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as contracts, correspondence, legal notices, court papers, or evidence.
  2. Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and involved parties.
  3. List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, or the lawyer's experience.
  4. Financial Information:
    If applicable, bring financial documents like pay stubs, tax returns, or bank statements.
  5. Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case.
  6. Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid ID for verification purposes.
  7. Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points.
  8. Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations.

How Much Does a Lawyer Cost?

The cost of hiring a lawyer varies widely based on several factors:

  • Fee Structures:
    • Hourly Rate:
      Lawyers may charge anywhere from $150 to $500 or more per hour, depending on experience and location.
    • Flat Fee:
      For routine legal services like drafting a will or handling an uncontested divorce, lawyers might offer a flat fee.
    • Retainer Fee:
      An upfront payment against which the lawyer bills hourly fees.
    • Contingency Fee:
      Common in personal injury cases; the lawyer receives a percentage (typically 25% to 40%) of any settlement or award.
    • Monthly Retainer:
      For ongoing services, businesses might pay a monthly fee for a set number of hours or services.
  • Factors Affecting Cost:
    • Complexity of the Case:
      More complex cases require more time and resources, increasing costs.
    • Lawyer's Experience:
      Highly experienced lawyers may charge higher fees.
    • Geographic Location:
      Legal fees can vary significantly by region or city.
    • Additional Expenses:
      Court filing fees, expert witness fees, travel expenses, and administrative costs may be extra.
  • Estimating Total Costs:
    Request a detailed fee agreement outlining all potential costs.
    Discuss any additional expenses that may arise during the case.
  • Negotiating Fees:
    Some lawyers may be willing to negotiate fees or offer payment plans, especially for clients with financial constraints.
  • Pro Bono Services:
    For those who cannot afford legal services, some lawyers or legal aid organizations offer services at reduced rates or for free.
Scroll to top