Filter by

star star star star star
04 Jul, 2021 by Brad
Dalton was assigned to me by David Crouse, whose firm I had hired for my divorce. He came to the first hearing unprepared and expressed to me his embarrassment at his performance. He then quit the firm with my second hearing coming up. It was on a Wednesday and I called the firm daily to try and talk to him and was told he was simply not in each time I called, until the Monday before the hearing, when I was told he had quit and that David Crouse would be handling my hearing. David spent his time at the hearing rambling about his own career, demonstrating that Dalton failed to brief anyone at the firm on my case. David later told me that Dalton "was not cut out for family law." Maybe he is cut out for what he's doing now, but I would worry about him quitting without telling anyone.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
23 Oct, 2022 by Chrishanthi
This guy is a thief we reported him to WA Bar association because we hired him he took 750 and did nothing and disappeared so if that is the case with you with this thief file you report with WA bar association because this kind of thieves should not allow to do any business
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
15 Sep, 2017 by Anonymous
I was assigned Rene Cochran as my public defender. She did not do a good job for me. She appeared tired and frustrated with me. She shouted at me. I could not understand what she wanted me to do. Her explanations were unclear and wandering. I certainly cannot recommend her to others. There is much more I am not saying due to the constraints of this review system.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
30 Jul, 2020 by Anonymous
We hired Matt to represent us outside of AVVO and subsequently left him and his services. Matt has an inability to listen to and be respectful of his female clients needs and wishes. We wasted a bunch of money dealing with Matt having to tell him the same thing repeatedly and not having him follow through. When my husband was on the phone and said what I had previously said Matt would listen. Fortunately his old law compensated us for much of the time Matt spent on our case when we questioned his work product and outcomes! We were pleased with the law firm but we don't recommend Matt and would discourage any woman from hiring him as I felt unheard, unrepresented and unhappy with our working relationship as his client.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
01 Mar, 2016 by Anonymous
In 2009 I was in a mva accident with a corporate company. ( fyi Police report stated I was 100 percent not at fault) I thought hiring Scott cifrese was a good idea because he knew the corporate law world. I was sadly mistaken only after the settlement was finalized. First off Scott was extremely hard to get ahold of and rarely returned phone calls from me in a timely manner if at all. Something deep down told me that he didn't care. (As lawyers only work as hard for you as they care to) I pressed forward hoping I made the right choice. During the settlement I did make a loan shark mistake which I thought Scott should have advised me not to. Or maybe helped me out knowing I had a solid case. He also never contacted anyone in my insurance company which pip would of covered and helped me not be put in the position to go to a settlement loan shark. But the biggest point to this review is about a year after my settlement i find some news out. First off during mediation when we settled, scott told me i have no doctors that back me and say the injuries i still suffer from today are directly related to my car accident. Basically saying i dont have much of a case. So a year after that im in descussion with my doctor who treated me during this time for my chronic injuries. I was still upset and made a comment on how he did not think my injuries were directly related to the mva. He looked at me with confusion and told me that in his legal inogouration (his statement for the case) hhe stated my chronic pain and further injuries were indeed directly related to the mva. I do feel strongly there was malpractice on Scott's part. I also feel he was either paid off or pushed me through the system to get his money with minimal effort.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
26 Jul, 2021 by Anonymous
He for some reason refused to file the proper paperwork which was a four page letter in which my child admitted to lying about the circumstances he stated in court to be out of his mother's house, resulting in my teenage son being placed with an adult couple he found on Facebook! Wtf?!!! Your inaction has caused another unnecessary wedge in the fractures of our very damaged relationship. This will literally affect the rest of both our lives, and you were so careless about it Please dear gods, don't try to "help" anymore ppl. You should probably not even be practicing law, what a disgrace
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
22 Sep, 2016 by Anonymous
A retired police officer, a woman whose niece was date raped, another woman with rape issues from her college days that was a Court Appointed Special Advocate(CASA), and a Department of Corrections(DOC) worker that worked in a prison primarily for sex offenders, sat on my jury, unchallenged. Most I didn't know about because Alan Rossi convinced me to not be present during the private jury voir dire held in chambers. It's on the record. Sheet music selectively removed from my massive collection. A vague letter with nothing to authenticate it. A music CD, the jurors were not allowed to listen to. I learned of these exhibits the first day of trial... when they were admitted and he didn't claim surprise. The judge asked him on the record if he claimed surprise, he said "no". The judge even mentioned how the letter couldn't be authenticated, yet Rossi insisted the prosecutor be allowed to use it. The judge even asked about the relevancy of the sheet music, and somehow they let them be entered because someone thought they were important. It's on the record. Rossi put me on the stand with no preparation at all. The prosecutor badgered me over and over about the word 'uninvited', basically testifying and answering my questions. Alan Rossi failed to ask for any clarification on things the prosecutor asked and just let them stay prejudicial. It's on the record. Rossi's closing argument was stuttered, broken up, no flow. Even I couldn't pay attention. No charisma at all. The record can't show this. The record only shows verbatim what he said, not how poorly it was delivered. The prosecutor engaged in misconduct during his closing arguments. This time Rossi objected, and then asked me if he should move for a mistrial. I said, "No?" thinking there's no way the jury could find me guilty. Not asking for a retrial did not "preserve" it for appeal. I blamed myself for a long time over this, but then realized his job was to educate and advise his client so he makes an intelligent decision. He did not do this. Although this conduct was brought up on appeal, the argument was lost based on not requesting a mistrial. This can be shown through court opinions and the record. Sentencing was delayed because Rossi requested the pre-sentencing investigation not be done, for whatever reason. Then the judge ordered it done. It's on the record. Rossi refused to file my notice of appeal. I tried to file it myself and he intercepted it. It was barely filed in time. I asked for all the transcripts, he intercepted it and left out the jury voir dire. The transcripts he left out contained what would later reverse my conviction. It's also what eventually reversed another one of his clients convictions. Letters/filings/opinions prove this. Rossi refused to file a motion for an appeal bond to secure my release. I couldn't file it because he was representing me. I had to try to fire him and file it myself. You can't fire a public defender! He finally withdrew, and I filed the motion. The judge called him in to represent me in court for the appeal bond hearing. My motion was granted. Alan Rossi turned to me and said, "I've never seen this before". Alan Rossi refused to give me my files as required by law and the state bar association. I was forced to CC one of his many letters of refusal to the Washington State Bar Association along with another letter very formally requesting he reconsider. What I eventually got was nearly worthless. When I asked where certain things were, he claimed it was attorney work product and I wasn't entitled to it. These are just the facts. Supported and documented. I was facing 4 charges and was acquitted on 2. 1 star may be appropriate where I couldn't leave no stars. However, all were life sentences, so winning 2 doesn't really affect anything.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
05 Sep, 2024 by Anonymous
I was referred to Rosemary Wear and sent them an email. Someone at their office called me back, asked some basic questions, and they transferred me to a second person for more basic questions. I was told Emily would call back at 3pm. That's three people total. Emily called just before 3pm. I was rushed off the phone by Emily and told they had to make other calls in this block and had to let me go. This was in response to my attempt to ask questions specific to my case. Their instructions during the rushed call were generalized and not specific to me or my case. Emily didn't seem to be present for our conversation. They told me to go to my local SSA office to apply for benefits--after acknowledging I already have an interview scheduled. It's almost as if ChatGPT had taken over the call with instructions to waste my time and ignore known facts. I'm very confused why I was called only to be told to take steps unrelated to my case, then essentially hung up on when I attempted to ask specific questions related to my application. Rushing through multiple calls is not going to help people in need of assistance, it's a hindrance. In a 22 minute phone call with Emily, I received a satisfactory answer to one question. I sent Rose Wear an email informing them of Emily's choices and asked if they had time that afternoon or the following morning for a few questions. Rose never responded. I sent them an email asking them to purge my information from their records. I don't recommend anyone contact Rose Ann Wear at Wear Law Office for any reason. If they're comfortable hanging up on someone seeking assistance, I wouldn't trust them to represent me in any way.
Read more Avvo
See more
star star star star star
27 Aug, 2024 by Anonymous
Knowledgeable yet unable to maintain professional conduct and privacy outside of the workplace setting.
Read more Avvo
See more
Discover the ideal lawyer
You can search a lawyer by practice area, lawyer name, city, state, or ZIP code
FAQs
Questions? We have answers

Top Questions to Ask a Lawyer

When meeting with a lawyer for the first time, it's important to ask the right questions to understand their expertise and determine if they're the right fit for your legal needs. Here are some top questions to consider:

  1. What experience do you have with cases similar to mine?
    Ensure the lawyer has relevant experience in the specific area of law pertaining to your case.
  2. How do you charge for your services, and what are the estimated costs?
    Understand the fee structure, including hourly rates, flat fees, retainer fees, and any additional expenses.
  3. What potential outcomes can I expect from my case?
    While no lawyer can guarantee results, they can provide an assessment of possible scenarios based on their experience.
  4. What is your approach to handling cases like mine?
    Learn about their strategy, whether they prefer negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
  5. Who will be working on my case?
    Find out if the lawyer will handle your case personally or delegate tasks to other attorneys or paralegals.
  6. How will you communicate with me throughout the process?
    Establish expectations for updates, preferred communication methods, and response times.
  7. What is the likely timeline for resolving my case?
    Get an estimate of how long the process may take from start to finish.
  8. Do you have references from past clients?
    Testimonials or references can provide insight into the lawyer's professionalism and effectiveness.
  9. What are the strengths and weaknesses of my case?
    Understanding potential challenges helps you prepare and sets realistic expectations.
  10. Are there alternative ways to solve my legal problem?
    Discuss options like mediation, arbitration, or settlement to resolve the issue efficiently.

How to Check the Credibility of a Lawyer

Before hiring a lawyer, it's crucial to verify their credibility and ensure they're qualified to handle your case:

  1. Verify Their License:
    Check with your state's bar association to confirm the lawyer is licensed and in good standing.
  2. Experience and Specialization:
    Ensure the lawyer specializes in the area of law relevant to your case.
  3. Disciplinary Record:
    Look up any history of disciplinary actions or complaints through the state bar association.
  4. Client Reviews and Testimonials:
    Read reviews on legal directories like Avvo, Martindale-Hubbell, or Google to gauge client satisfaction.
  5. Professional Memberships:
    Membership in professional organizations or specialty bar associations can indicate a commitment to their field.
  6. Awards and Recognitions:
    Honors from reputable organizations reflect expertise and a positive reputation.
  7. Consultation Assessment:
    Use the initial consultation to evaluate their communication skills, responsiveness, and willingness to address your concerns.
  8. Ask for References:
    A credible lawyer should be willing to provide references from past clients.

What Should I Prepare for My First Consultation?

To make the most of your initial meeting with a lawyer, come prepared with:

  1. Relevant Documents:
    Bring all documents related to your case, such as contracts, correspondence, legal notices, court papers, or evidence.
  2. Written Summary:
    Prepare a concise written summary of your situation, including key dates, events, and involved parties.
  3. List of Questions:
    Write down any questions you have about your case, the legal process, or the lawyer's experience.
  4. Financial Information:
    If applicable, bring financial documents like pay stubs, tax returns, or bank statements.
  5. Contact Information:
    Provide details of any witnesses or other parties relevant to your case.
  6. Personal Identification:
    Bring a valid ID for verification purposes.
  7. Pen and Notebook:
    Take notes during the consultation to remember important points.
  8. Budget Constraints:
    Be ready to discuss your budget and any financial limitations.

How Much Does a Lawyer Cost?

The cost of hiring a lawyer varies widely based on several factors:

  • Fee Structures:
    • Hourly Rate:
      Lawyers may charge anywhere from $150 to $500 or more per hour, depending on experience and location.
    • Flat Fee:
      For routine legal services like drafting a will or handling an uncontested divorce, lawyers might offer a flat fee.
    • Retainer Fee:
      An upfront payment against which the lawyer bills hourly fees.
    • Contingency Fee:
      Common in personal injury cases; the lawyer receives a percentage (typically 25% to 40%) of any settlement or award.
    • Monthly Retainer:
      For ongoing services, businesses might pay a monthly fee for a set number of hours or services.
  • Factors Affecting Cost:
    • Complexity of the Case:
      More complex cases require more time and resources, increasing costs.
    • Lawyer's Experience:
      Highly experienced lawyers may charge higher fees.
    • Geographic Location:
      Legal fees can vary significantly by region or city.
    • Additional Expenses:
      Court filing fees, expert witness fees, travel expenses, and administrative costs may be extra.
  • Estimating Total Costs:
    Request a detailed fee agreement outlining all potential costs.
    Discuss any additional expenses that may arise during the case.
  • Negotiating Fees:
    Some lawyers may be willing to negotiate fees or offer payment plans, especially for clients with financial constraints.
  • Pro Bono Services:
    For those who cannot afford legal services, some lawyers or legal aid organizations offer services at reduced rates or for free.
Scroll to top